User talk:Lou Sipher

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bacterial pneumonia have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bacterial pneumonia was changed by Lou Sipher (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901475 on 2021-09-22T01:45:59+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Helen(💬📖) 01:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You’re full of shit. Typical liberal lemming. Stop suppressing truth ya dumb bitch!!!!! Lou Sipher (talk) 01:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Dinkins. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JellyMan9001 (talk) 02:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You’re a joke. Lou Sipher (talk) 02:03, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bacterial pneumonia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please refer to WP:RELIABLE for information on what is considered a reliable source by wikipedia. JellyMan9001 (talk) 02:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I sighted a reliable source. You’re choosing to call it “unreliable” to fit your leftist liberal disinformation agenda. You removing my edits proves you are dishonest. Lou Sipher (talk) 02:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Lou Sipher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bacterial pneumonia did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 01:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I provided verifiable proof last time and you rejected it. Doesn’t conform to your leftist liberal disinformation agenda. Prolonged mask use causes bacterial pneumonia. By suppressing this truth you are killing people. Lou Sipher (talk) 01:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 02:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]