User talk:Lucasbenjamin 089
September 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Annh07. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Publishing have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. [1] Annh07 (talk) 13:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey Annh07, I added a related link to the publishing page. Why did you remove it? Can you explain? Lucasbenjamin 089 (talk) 13:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- A source that needs our guidelines as given in WP:RS. These commercial sites are spam, not reliable sources. Please read WP:LINKSPAM, WP:ELNO. Annh07 (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, it’s fine, but we create easy-to-use content and its benefits. It’s not spam or anything like that. Lucasbenjamin 089 (talk) 05:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- A source that needs our guidelines as given in WP:RS. These commercial sites are spam, not reliable sources. Please read WP:LINKSPAM, WP:ELNO. Annh07 (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 06:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Abbasshaikh124 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasshaikh124. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Izno (talk) 06:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.