User talk:Meatsgains/Archive 12
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Meatsgains. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Lady Like (character), Meatsgains.
Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
This article is not ready for mainspace.
To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Avadim Technologies, Inc.
Thank you for your contributions to the Avadim Technologies Inc page, Meatsgains! Could you help make this page better? We would love your expertise to make this article the best it could possibly be! Thanks! Colecmaita (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- Given your conflict of interest, thank you for not editing the page yourself. My suggestion, post on the article's talk page with content you'd like to add along with reliable sources for support. I'll go through your requests and expand the page with the relevant content. Meatsgains (talk) 02:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Legendary TQ album page
Just wondering why you added the orphan tag to this page?? orphan tags are for pages that have no links to it, and it does, so i'm a bit confused. TQfan (talk) 23:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- At the time when I added the tag, no pages linked to Legendary (TQ album). Meatsgains (talk) 17:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- that's because you were too impatient... you added the tag seconds after i had finished creating/editing the page. i then linked to the page 2 minutes later. you can check the edit history of the pages if you wish... also, if you'd maybe looked at the edit history of the album page, you would have seen it was a new page. can't you give people time to create and link things?! wow. TQfan (talk) 18:08, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Relax, that's part of the New Page Review process. It take 10 seconds to remove the tag once its resolved. Not the end of the world. Meatsgains (talk) 18:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- that's because you were too impatient... you added the tag seconds after i had finished creating/editing the page. i then linked to the page 2 minutes later. you can check the edit history of the pages if you wish... also, if you'd maybe looked at the edit history of the album page, you would have seen it was a new page. can't you give people time to create and link things?! wow. TQfan (talk) 18:08, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Welcome
Hi! I am a hungarian Wikipedia-writer, and I speak English a little. I want to learn English superlative, but this is very hard. Please, than I write in English Wikipedia something bad, you and the every writer in Wikipedia not be mad at me. I learn in English continuously, and I progress me. I write in Hungarian Wikipedia since 2012, so I have experience already. Thank you for understanding!
My heartfelt greetings, Ádám Matuz (17) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephanmattheisen (talk • contribs) 21:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Welcome to English Wikipedia. I'd be happy to help as best I can so feel free to reach out to me with any questiosn you might have along the way. Good luck! Meatsgains (talk) 23:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
AFD Waterford UPSTART
Hi. I've removed your AFD for Waterford UPSTART as it was malformed. The first nomination was closed as mooted due to speedy deletion. If you want to take this to AFD, it will need to be done as a second nomination. But considering it is both blatant advertising and a substantial copyvio, it is likely to disappear again as a speedy deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 22:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- How was my AfD malformed? I nominated the page for AfD and then two speedy deletion tags were added. Meatsgains (talk) 22:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterford UPSTART was closed because the article had already been deleted. The article you nominated was a recreation after the deletion. Your nomination should have been made as the second nomination for deletion. You added to the first nomination. It appears that user:CAPTAIN RAJU tried fixing this by creating Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterford UPSTART (2nd nomination). Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 05:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Ah I see. What a mess! Meatsgains (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterford UPSTART was closed because the article had already been deleted. The article you nominated was a recreation after the deletion. Your nomination should have been made as the second nomination for deletion. You added to the first nomination. It appears that user:CAPTAIN RAJU tried fixing this by creating Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterford UPSTART (2nd nomination). Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 05:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Technology update:
- Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
General project update:
- The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
- Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thanks very much for reviewing Lynx Equity Ltd, Meatsgains. I have added in-depth references. I need your suggestions regarding the Tag. ViktoriaCerena (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- I voted to keep the page on the AfD but I'd suggest continuing to find additional independent reliable sources detailing the company to establish notability. Meatsgains (talk) 16:52, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your review
Thank you for your review on Edward Hagerman, but Edward Hagerman has a link to it on Biological warfare within references. I am new to Wikipedia, so I'm not sure if it just counts as an orphaned article, or if you just missed it. Thanks again. User:Citationhelper 02:09, 31 August 2017
- You are correct, Biological warfare does link to Edward Hagerman so I've removed the orphan tag. Meatsgains (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for removing the tag. Citationhelper (talk) 12:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your review on Luichy Guzman
Thank you for your review on Luichy Guzman. Now it has a reference. Thanks again. Luichy (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2017
- The article needs additional sources since most of content cannot be verified. Meatsgains (talk) 17:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Tom Hiddleston
As you may recall, you took part in an infobox image RfC at the Tom Hiddleston article (see here) about nine months ago. Less than a month ago, an editor who has been changing infobox images indiscriminately and is now blocked for disruption because of that activity as well as using sock accounts (see here), changed the consensus photo [1]. It is not an improvement, in my opinion. I think the photo should just be changed back to the consensus image, but cannot do so as I am currently under a revert restriction. What's your opinion: have the consensus photo put back in or start a new RfC to include the current photo in the choices? Personally, I don't think even the new image is better than the one that was the other choice in the January RfC. -- ψλ ● ✉ 16:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't oppose the new image that was added to the infobox but I certainly think the one we came to consensus on is certainly better for an infobox. I went ahead and restored the previous image. If others oppose the change, we can open up another RfC. Meatsgains (talk) 17:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ben Franklin effect
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ben Franklin effect you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Stedil -- Stedil (talk) 03:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ben Franklin effect
The article Ben Franklin effect you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ben Franklin effect for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Stedil -- Stedil (talk) 05:41, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Stub sorting
Please don't use the {{stub}} if you can find a more specific stub type. If you need a user script, there is one here. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Meatsgains. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |