User talk:MedGME

MedGME, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MedGME! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

thank you and greetings

Welcome to Wikipedia. Sorry I felt the need to revert your edit to DVT. I explained my rationale in the edit summary. We generally discuss article related concerns at the talk page for articles, so Talk:Deep vein thrombosis but I wanted to say hello. The Teahouse (linked above) or WT:MED are places to ask questions in case you have any. Best wishes. Biosthmors (talk) 16:44, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind comments. I will add to the Talk page for further discussion.MedGME (talk) 14:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, MedGME! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CMD (talk) 14:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I appreciate very much your message! MedGME (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Wilhelmi has been accepted

Alfred Wilhelmi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

─ The Aafī on Mobile ^{^(talk)} 06:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rescue inhaler (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Inhaler instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rescue inhaler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rescue inhaler, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ectopic hormone has been accepted

Ectopic hormone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cassiopeia talk 02:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello MedGME. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Piedmont Healthcare, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MedGME. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MedGME|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
You have created an advert, with references which are churnalism Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 15:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have financial attachments to the this subject. I have created and edited this article in good faith. I have used sources that I consider reliable and have gone on the wikipedia library and confirmed those sources. The article is very brief, just states facts such as purchases that have been widely publicized in various news sources and makes this subject notable of a wikipedia page .It even mentions a nurse organization that has expressed concerns over those purchases.MedGME (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the declaration. All Wikipedia's may be asked questions like this during their time here. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a separate matter your sources are all PR pieces, churnalism, and add no value to the quest for notability im a wikipedia sense. a PR piece is issued by the subject and is not independent, It is a primary source.

It does not matter that the media organ is itself reliable, all media may carry a press release. Many are identifiable on sight by theor format, often starting thus:

PLACENAME, Foo Corporation announced some announcement or other on this date.

Often they end with contact details, but not always. Sometimes a bylined journalist picks it up and massages it.

I used to write press releases that the journal could pick up and massage with very little work. That way they hit their word target and I got my PR placement. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On your references 9 and 10 (currently)

You will see that they are identical. So the are not multiple independent sources.

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:53, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will continue this discussion in the Talk page for the article. MedGME (talk) 18:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Piedmont Healthcare moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Piedmont Healthcare, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The alternative to moving this article back to Draft space was to send it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. I have reviewed it there. It is notable, but you must verify its notability for it to exist as an article. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your guidance. MedGME (talk) 11:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Piedmont Healthcare (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I have moved this back to Draft today after performing a source analysis (shown on the Talk page) and after your comment that these sources are all that there is (I am paraphrasing your talk page comment).

Please do not move this back to mainspace without attending to the sourcing, which is churnalism.

Your understanding of referencing is flawed. Broadly, it must pass WP:42, a short version of what is required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Piedmont Healthcare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Piedmont Healthcare, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:46, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank youMedGME (talk) 11:46, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rescue inhaler

Hello, MedGME. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rescue inhaler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Piedmont Healthcare

Hello, MedGME. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Piedmont Healthcare, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking input on suggested edit to USMLE article

Hello, @MedGME. I noticed that you've contributed to USMLE and I was wondering if you could provide some feedback on an edit suggested I recently posted to the talk page. There is a factual error that I've suggested an edit for. Basically, it says that those with Osteopathic degrees have to pass either the COMLEX or the USMLE for licensure. Sources say that many DOs take USMLE to improve their chances with residency applications, but not that they can opt for USMLE only, so the either/or language seems incorrect to me. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! SBCornelius (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issue has been addressed. Thank you for your inputs!! MedGME (talk) 13:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Piedmont Healthcare

Hello, MedGME. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Piedmont Healthcare".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Achondroplasiaphobia

The article Achondroplasiaphobia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find reliable medical sources that discuss this phobia. Google search results in fewer than 100 results, none of which is a proper medical source. Zero results from a PubMed search. The APA source given in the article is for insomnia, while the Mayo Clinic and Little People sources are broken links.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 17:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marjorie Stone

Hello MedGME,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Marjorie Stone for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Marjorie Stone to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Received. Agree with speedy deletion

Concern regarding Draft:Marjorie Stone

Hello, MedGME. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marjorie Stone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marjorie Stone

Hello, MedGME. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marjorie Stone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

I noticed you have been editing some health-related articles, and I wanted to say that a bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us if that's an area of editing that interests you. It's a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO!!

HELLO QQQspadesQQQ (talk) 18:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO!!! QQQspadesQQQ (talk) 03:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Medical school, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Residency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]