This is an archive of past discussions with User:Middayexpress. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Middayexpress, I asked you to respect my page and have your discussion with Biggleswiki elsewhere. You have been disrespectful, arrogant and condescending and have no interest in reaching a 'consensus'. Just because you have been on Wikipedia for longer than I have been does not give you some sort of status. I have a right to decide who and what I wanted posted on my page so keep further discussions on this matter on the Dahabshiil page.
Honestly, I'm trying to figure out where all this hostility is coming from. I contacted you one last time to invite you to try and arrive at an actual consensus on the article's discussion page -- my idea, not yours; you suggested that "if you want to futher discuss this issue, please take it to Biggleswiki's usertalk page" -- since you had already rather rudely and unreasonably requested that both Biggleswiki and I essentially sod off from your userspace. But this, of course, is difficult to tell since for some reason you already deleted [1] that invitation from your page. And that was only after you had already blanked Biggleswiki's inoffensive, fact-based comments too [2]. From this, one could be forgiven for assuming that you don't actually want to seek out at a consensus and have no intention of working with others to arrive at a satisfactory draft. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 20:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
You have taken a rude and condescending tone towards me almost from the beginning, but for some reason I am the one who is being hostile? Come on, let's stop with the games and be adults here. You can not accuse me of not wanting to reach a consensus when I have taken almost every suggestion made by Biggleswiki into consideration and have changed the wording, title and placement of the passage in the article. What you need to understand is that reaching a consensus does not mean omitting information ( with verifiable sources) because you don't like it. If there are portions of the passage you want me to reword, make your suggestions and I will amend it but deleting information with sources because you and Biggleswiki don't like it is unacceptable. (Bot3skfjs (talk) 21:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC))
Here's a challenge: quote a passage where I have supposedly been "rude" to you. In response, I will match it with at least three from you personally directed at not only me, but the other involved editor as well. As for the rest of your argument, if material is original research or a WP:BLP violation (as is the case with a lot of the material here), it will be dealt with according to the protocols outlined in those policies. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I think it's becoming obvious that you have some sort of grudge against me. I will not be going back and forth in discussion with you about this, so stop revising my work. (Bot3skfjs (talk) 03:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC))
I don't see how I could have a "personal grudge" against a brand new account I first encountered only a few days ago. You have already alleged that I was "rude" to you, but predictably declined to provide quotes of this supposed "rudeness" when challenged to. Now you have added some more BLP violations, only this time to the Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed. But complaining about the fact that I reverted that dubious material won't make it any less OR than it is. As already explained, only Wikipedia's policies determine protocol on this website, not individual editors' personal wants. By the way, next time you want to deluge my talk page with more aggressive talk, I will unfortunately have to channel you and avail myself of WP:BLANKING. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Middayexpress. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
