User talk:Mkonikkara

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mkonikkara! Thank you for your contributions. I am SudoGhost and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Sudo Ghost 17:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Perfect Host, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - Sudo Ghost 17:47, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at The Perfect Host, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sudo Ghost 17:47, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at The Perfect Host shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sudo Ghost 17:48, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPOILER

I understand the reasoning for removing the information, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of information, Wikipedia doesn't remove information just because it would be a "spoiler". - Sudo Ghost 17:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - Sudo Ghost 18:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at The Perfect Host. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Nick-D (talk) 01:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]