User talk:MoWasHere
September 2016
[edit]Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
November 2017
[edit]Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Academic writing has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. The speculative fiction writer's toolkit is not an essay mill. The reference you replaced it with is perhaps better, but giving incorrect rationales in the edit summary is still unhelpful. Similarly, the Digital Scholarship and Ready to Research websites are not spam but high-quality resources that are useful for the readers. bonadea contributions talk 12:02, 6 November 2017 (UTC)