Jump to content

User talk:Mooretwin/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12

Rangers FC dispute

I'm not sure if you aware that there is a discussion about the Rangers dispute at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Rangers_F.C to discuss whether there should be a single Rangers FC article instead of the two that presently exist for Rangers 1872-2012 and the Newco Rangers. Regards Fishiehelper2 (talk) 21:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CarlingPremiershipbig.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CarlingPremiershipbig.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of N.F.C. Kesh

The article N.F.C. Kesh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability, fails WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:11, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Police Community Support Officer not Police community support officer

The Association of Chief Police officers refers to PCSOs in capitals as does the Home Office see http://www.acpo.police.uk/documents/LPpartnerships/2007/200709LPPGonPCSO.pdf and http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/about-us/corporate-publications-strategy/home-office-circulars/circulars-2009/002-2009/--T9062856 (talk) 23:10, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Policemen and civil servants in unnecessary capitalisation shocker. They're wrong: see the legislation. And that doesn't explain why you've capitalised "police constable". Mooretwin (talk) 08:41, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dundonald International Ice Bowl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:13, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Rose Report

I'm trying to get some feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Northern Ireland#Rose Report on the "Rose Report" which has been listed for several years on WikiProject Northern Ireland as an article in need of creation. I've had the request for information up since 20 August without response. At least we should be able to identify what it is so we can see if it really belongs on that list. Even if you don't know what it is, saying so would be a help. If we get enough of those, that will at least answer the question about its importance. Thanks in advance. --Bejnar (talk) 02:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

From CAIN:
A major survey was undertaken in 1968 by an American professor based in Glasgow, Richard Rose. This was published in his famous book on Northern Ireland, Governing Without Consensus. The survey covered a very wide range of political and social issues and provides an invaluable benchmark of conditions and attitudes in the last years of the Stormont regime and immediately prior to the ‘troubles’.
The survey included a section on housing conditions, and Professor Rose discovered what was later confirmed by the 1971 census, that is, that Catholics had a disproportionately large share of local authority houses. The advantage to Catholics was very marked in Belfast, which had a unionist council (19% of Catholics were in local authority houses compared with 9% of Protestants), and in areas with nationalist councils (39% of Catholics compared with 15% of Protestants). Elsewhere, Catholics and Protestants got an equal share of local authority houses. Professor Rose’s conclusion was that there was:
...no evidence of systematic discrimination against Catholics. The greatest bias appears to favour Catholics in areas controlled by Catholic councillors.
Mooretwin (talk) 08:27, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
If only more people read that before spouting off the same old delusional rubbish about "discrimination" and "sectarianism". — Jon C.ॐ 08:46, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Result of the appeal you filed at WP:Arbitration enforcement

Please see the result of your appeal. You may now edit on the topic of British baronetcies, but your ban from WP:TROUBLES remains in place. The ban can be appealed every six months per the original terms. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

That's pathetic. You may as well have kept the full ban in place for all the difference that makes. A disproportionate ban imposed for an impetuous retaliatory complaint that doesn't allow me to edit in my areas of expertise - and then the ban is retained because I haven't demonstrated collaborative editing, yet I can't demonstrate collaborative editing while banned. Unbelievable. Mooretwin (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Crumlin Star F.C.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Crumlin Star F.C., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:34, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Immaculata F.C.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Immaculata F.C., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Killyclooney Cricket Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Killyclooney Cricket Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mtking (edits) 02:49, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fox Lodge Cricket Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fox Lodge Cricket Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mtking (edits) 03:00, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bonds Glen Cricket Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bonds Glen Cricket Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mtking (edits) 03:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

British Home Championship

Your mass page moves should have been discussed first - please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#British Home Championship. GiantSnowman 10:50, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

It would be appreciated if you could fix the dashes and the template. GiantSnowman 17:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm afraid I don't know how. Mooretwin (talk) 23:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
You need to move the articles to titles using – instead of -, and then make sure the links in the template actually go straight to the articles rather than via a redirect. You can do this by copy-pasting the article titles. It's a basic courtesy to fix template links when you move articles. Number 57 09:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
I notice you still haven't fixed this problem you created. Are you planning on doing it anytime soon? Number 57 10:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid I don't have time at present and I'm not really sure how to. What does "copy=pasing the article titles" mean? Feel free to do it yourself if you have time. Mooretwin (talk) 10:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I mean just copy paste the dash if you don't know how to create it on your keyboard (alt+0150). I think it's a pretty poor show that you've created this mess and aren't willing to help resolve it. Number 57 20:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
A mess? Have a word wi' yersel'! I am willing, I just don't have the time at present. Mooretwin (talk) 23:40, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I see some kind soul has done it. Mooretwin (talk) 09:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Newry-CIty-Football-Club-badge.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Newry-CIty-Football-Club-badge.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LGA talkedits 01:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Billy Humphries

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Billy Humphries. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

FFS give me a chance. I left a message on the Talk page. Mooretwin (talk) 09:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Civility, Mooretwin. The editor above your comment here was a bot. In the other case you were reacting to a "real" editor. It's only asked that a source is provided for biographies of living people, and as an editor with 15,000+ edits and nearly five years on Wikipedia, you should know that. In the future you can include a reference when creating the article. Thanks, C679 10:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
I started to create the article and ran out of time. So I left a note on the Talk page to make it clear that I would be returning soon to finish the article. Obviously that was going to include adding the references. I wasn't even given 24 hours' breathing space before the messages began. Some people only have a limited amount of time to spend on WP - give us a break, we're only trying to improve the encyclopaedia. Thanks. Mooretwin (talk) 14:29, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Warren Feeney, Sr. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Newforge Lane may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:24, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ravenhill Stadium may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Limerick F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dolphin F.C. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Contact

Mooretwin, would you mind dropping me a line on the e-mail from my contact page please? SonofSetanta (talk) 16:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malahide Cricket Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ODI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kilroot Recreation F.C.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kilroot Recreation F.C., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

I have (re-)deleted the article. This has indeed to go via deletion review. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Why did you delete it when it meets WP:FOOTY notability guidelines and without allowing sufficient time for discussion? Is it gone forever, can it be revived? Mooretwin (talk) 11:06, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
In cases like this, the applicable policy is WP:G4 - speedy deletion as a "recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion." However that criteria also says "This excludes ... pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies." In this case playing in a national cup meets WP:FOOTYN, though again, the more sources to establish the club's notability the better really. In this case, you should ask the deleting admin to review, as a credible claim of notability was made which was different from the original reason it was deleted and therefore G4 does not apply. If that doesn't work, go to deletion review. The content is not gone forever, an admin can send you a copy of it to work on in your user space. Valenciano (talk) 12:11, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Mooretwin (talk) 20:14, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kilroot Recreation F.C. badge.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kilroot Recreation F.C. badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Mooretwin. You have new messages at Lectonar's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of top-division football clubs in UEFA countries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Football clubs with wrong foundation date on their club badge

Category:Football clubs with wrong foundation date on their club badge, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:46, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Broomhill F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richhill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Premier League?

Premier League (disambiguation) has a link that I changed to the NIFL Premiership, what do you think? Right one, or do we need to say formerly after it? Cheers Murry1975 (talk) 18:35, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Whitehead, County Antrim may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ==Sport]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Laurevale FC badge.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Laurevale FC badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fivemiletown United badge.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fivemiletown United badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Irn-bru-league-cup.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Irn-bru-league-cup.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to High school may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [Reception (school)|reception]] & Years 1–6 – or ages 4–11) and a [[Secondary school|"secondary"]] (Years 7–11, often also including a [[Sixth form|"sixth form"]], aka Years 12 & 13, or lower/upper

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Leinster Cricket Union logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leinster Cricket Union logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass93! (what I've been up to/drop me a ___) 14:38, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Northern Cricket Union of Ireland logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Northern Cricket Union of Ireland logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass93! (what I've been up to/drop me a ___) 14:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kilmore Rec badge.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kilmore Rec badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Civil Service Cricket Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Indians and GAA
Pembroke Cricket Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to MCC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seaview (football ground), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ladbrokes Championship logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ladbrokes Championship logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

You want to say, the capital of Ireland is Belfast??

http://www.rsssf.com/tablesb/bhc1947-66.html. please--Unikalinho (talk) 13:09, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

RSSSF isn't a reliable source. These discussions/articles may help:
The second link has two secondary sources. Mooretwin (talk) 13:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

It's good, but when we say or read "Ireland", mean https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Ireland_national_football_team, is the other team. So I think, is correctly to write in "our" article "Northern Ireland".--Unikalinho (talk) 19:43, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve 2014–15 Irish Cup

Hi, I'm TheMagikCow. Mooretwin, thanks for creating 2014–15 Irish Cup!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand and refreance

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. TheMagikCow (talk) 10:39, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Jeez, give us a chance! Mooretwin (talk) 11:20, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ballynahinch Olympic F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballynahinch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dunloy F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [http://www.dunloyfc.co.uk Club web site]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Northern Amateur League badge.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Northern Amateur League badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Look at Life (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parachute Regiment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bruff R.F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Munster Senior Cup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Appeal of your topic ban from the WP:TROUBLES area

Your AE appeal has been declined. See the suggestions there for how you might edit so as to improve the chances of a future appeal succeeding. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Railway Union Cricket Club badge.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Railway Union Cricket Club badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Shankill United badge.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shankill United badge.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cork United F.C. (1979)

The article Cork United F.C. (1979) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable club. No independent refs. No claim of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:14, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Phoenix Cricket Club badge.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phoenix Cricket Club badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Cork United F.C. (1979)

You removed my PROD from the new article Cork United F.C. (1979) with this edit and the edit summary 'Rm speedy deletion. Club meets WP:FOOTBALL notability criteria, having played in national cup competition (FAI Cup)'. I'd like to point out (a) that the article was nominated for proposed deletion rather than speedy deletion (b) there remains no WP:Reliable source in the article with the claim that it was ever in the FAI Cup. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Railway Union Cricket Club

A tag has been placed on Railway Union Cricket Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it does not show the importance of the organization in question

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Anarchyte (talk) 11:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 9 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Hunslet F.C. (rugby league)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hunslet F.C. (rugby league), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://maps.thefullwiki.org/Hunslet_Hawks.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Phoenix club (sports)

Hi. I noticed you added a number of clubs to this article. I have reverted your edits because none of the assertions you made were referenced. If you wish to add any back, please ensure you source each one to a reliable reference confirming the club is a phoenix club. Simply sharing a similar name or coming from the same town does not make one club a de facto phoenix club of another. Thanks. Fenix down (talk) 12:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Cork football teams

Just want to say I think you have made a pick ear's of merging both Evergreen United/Cork Celtic and Fordsons F.C./Cork F.C.. No problem with merging but if you are going to do it, do it probably. Whole chucks of their history have gone missing. The former clubs should at least have a named section/paragraph in the new merged article. I will have to come back and tidy up the mess you have made. DjlnDjln (talk) 15:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the encouraging comments. I wasn't aware of removing any of the history. Feel free to improve, but note that they are not former clubs, but merely name changes (hence the mergers). Mooretwin (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

I just want to say…

I just want to say, you're doing a cracking job with all things rugby league, keep up the great work. Best regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 12:49, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I appreciate that. Mooretwin (talk) 22:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Crikey, you're relentless :) DynamoDegsy (talk) 10:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Broughton Rangers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Gateshead Thunder (1999)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gateshead Thunder (1999), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://services.sunderland.ac.uk/universitysport/watchsport/professionalsport/rugbyunionrugbyleague/gatesheadthunderrugbyleague/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sheffield Eagles

Hi! Personally, I'm not that bothered either way if the Sheffield Eagles articles are separate or merged. I advised Northern Wonder to start a discussion rather than revert should you re-separate the articles. Hopefully, s/he will not start an edit war with you! If s/he does, as the more senior editor, I suggest you be the one to start the discussion and get the consensus, that way any further edit warring can easily be avoided. If this happens, to get the maximum comments, it may be worth having the discussion on the WikiProject Rugby League talk page with a link to it on the Sheffield articles talk page. Happy editing! :) RugbyXIII (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for the advice. Mooretwin (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Mooretwin. You have new messages at Talk:Gateshead Thunder (1999).
Message added 22:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RugbyXIII (talk) 22:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of defunct rugby league clubs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Bradford Park Avenue

You are engaged in mass controversial edits and you have made a real mess of pages/histories. Please stop ASAP or you will be blocked to prevent further disruption. GiantSnowman 12:24, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Controversial? There is a consensus on the Talk page. Not sure how a "real mess" was made: it was a simple and logical process of separating the articles and related categories. Mooretwin (talk) 13:07, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
There is no consensus for your edits. GiantSnowman 17:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:BOLD Mooretwin (talk) 09:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rugby Football League Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Helens Recs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Request comment

Hi Mooretwin, you may wish to comment on the merger suggestion by User:Northern Wonder of the Sheffield Eagles articles here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby league. RugbyXIII (talk) 20:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Helens Recreation RLFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Helens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cork County Cricket Club badge.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cork County Cricket Club badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Orange Walk/version 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orange Walk/version 2. Since you had some involvement with the Orange Walk/version 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Notecardforfree (talk) 22:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bangor RFC (Northern Ireland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Six Nations. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Dojni

A tag has been placed on Template:Dojni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. st170etalk 02:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1890–91 Irish League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grosvenor Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Richill FC badge.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Richill FC badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Luke's F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twinbrook. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Leinster Senior Cup

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mooretwin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Result of your AE appeal

Per this decision your AE appeal is successful and the Troubles topic ban is lifted. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:49, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations, Mooretwin :) GoodDay (talk) 21:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. Mooretwin (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm MereTechnicality. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2017 Bradford Bulls season have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MereTechnicality (talk) 23:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Please consider applying for Autopatrolled

Hi, I've just patrolled an article you created. Having had a look through some of your previous created articles it seems to me that you should apply for the Autopatrolled permission. It would help reduce the backlog at New Page Patrol if articles as good as the ones you've been creating weren't on the list.

My only amendments to the articles I patrolled were to reuse references using reFill, and to add appropriate projects on the talk pages. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 16:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Robert Bolton (politician)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Robert Bolton (politician), Mooretwin!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your time and effort in writing this - it's appreciated. It's been reviewed now. Could you look at it and see if you can help address the improvement tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carniny Amateur & Youth F.C.

The article Carniny Amateur & Youth F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable amateur sports team, lacks reliable sources, fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jellyman (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mooretwin/Archive_11&oldid=1143177501"