User talk:MrHappy2020

December 2024

Hi MrHappy2020! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 16:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been trying to avoid a edit war by finding a comprise with you. MrHappy2020 (talk) 17:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628. Remsense ‥ 论 04:48, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt disrupt anything the previous version of the page was that it was a stalemate as the two powers spent 20 years ish fighting each other but no territory was changed and both were left weakened you threatening anytime i make a edit you dont like is uncool and none professional. MrHappy2020 (talk) 12:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to believe you're taking your changes or your fellow editors seriously when you remove a sourced attestation while replacing it with something specifically against site guidelines and saying "restoring sourced material". At least, don't expect anyone else to have patience for that. There's no compromise between honest and dishonest: work with what the sources actually say or stop disrupting the encyclopedia. Remsense ‥ 论 08:11, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a talk page on the article where we can discuss this MrHappy2020 (talk) 12:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]