User talk:Mreegatrishna

Speedy deletion nomination of Abhigyan anurag

Hello Mreegatrishna,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abhigyan anurag for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, — billinghurst sDrewth 07:07, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abhigyan anurag

The article Abhigyan anurag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book, no sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui 雲‍水 07:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abhigyan anurag for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhigyan anurag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhigyan anurag until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bishnu Saikia (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]