User talk:NPOVfan

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NPOVfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi can anyone tell me why in a second someone has "accused" me of being any sock puppet? Neither is there any proof nor have I made any mistakes, look at my edits. I have removed Iranian pov of User:07fan and User:Tajik (see Buyids), the pan-iranist 07fan did not like my edits but Pan-Iranians are not important, serious scholarly works are the standard. Who is User:Khoikhoi? Please stop this meat puppet of 07fan and Tajik

Decline reason:

Your request is largely incomprehensible. See WP:GAB. — Sandstein 11:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See Buyids and see Dailam: my edit that corresponds with the Iranica and see who puts unsourced information to the article [1] - once again it is 07fan. but it is me who is blocked by Khoikhoi and not 07fan. There is no logic in this. NPOVfan (talk) 10:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recognized Sandstein's answer and modify my request and shorten it:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NPOVfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked with a reason that is not true. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

We cannot verify your assertion that you are not a sockpuppet of Altai Khan (talk · contribs). Given that your contributions are similar to his, you must provide evidence that calls the blocking admin's judgment into serious doubt. — Sandstein 12:43, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Sandstein: I do not understand why I have to provide evidence for a "judgement" that never was proven.
I do not know User Altai Khan. what were the similarities between us? Did he also refer to the Encyclopaedia Iranica? Is everyone who refers to the Encyclopaedia Iranica the same person? NPOVfan (talk) 14:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and here are my few contrubutions. Can you explain where you see "similar contributions" in 6 edits ? sorry you are not fair to me at all. It seems to me that you simply want to advocate the wrong decision of the blocking admin. NPOVfan (talk) 14:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NPOVfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Altai Khan. Please unlock me.

Decline reason:

Based on the evidence the blocking admin has explained to me, I am forced to agree that you are Altai Khan. Yes, you have only made a few contributions, but you obviously have had accounts before this, and the recent history of the Buyid Dynasty page suggests a connection to this banned user. Mango juice^talk 18:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've contacted the blocking admin. Mango juice^talk 16:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mango. I only can repeat that I am not Altai Khan - I do not know this user and when I look in his also small contribution list[2], I really think this all is a joke by you. (I have seen now this edit, I am not new at wikipedia, I often have made edits in the past as IP. see also[3]. However what is the link from this IP to Altai Khan?) Come on guys I don't understand you: is it that much difficult to explain which edit of me must be an edit of Altai Khan? I have made only a few edits, I have referred to one of the standard works of the Oriental studies, to the Encyclopaedia Iranica, the pan-iranian user User:07fan has reverted these information without any reason and has declared the Buyids to "Iranians". Show me a mistake of mine: is it a mistake to refer to the Iranica???

Why does any user who wants the Wikipedia to be based on scholarly works instead of Iranian biased simplifications has to be banned? This means that Users like User:07fan who are pro-Iranian biasing the articles while ignoring the Iranica and without giving any reason[4][5] can make here everything while neutral users have to be banned? You must be joking. Please unban me. NPOVfan (talk) 21:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NPOVfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Altai Khan. Please unlock me.

Decline reason:

Considering your choice of username is a play on the WP:NPOV policy, it's unlikely that you're a new editor to Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Sock puppetry prohibits the use of multiple accounts to edit Wikipedia. Please appeal your editing ban on the user talk page of your original account. -- Netsnipe ► 14:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Considering your choice of username is a play on the WP:NPOV policy, it's unlikely that you're a new editor to Wikipedia.

I think you even did not read my entries, I am not a new user, I had worked sometimes as IP. Read my last entry. I know wikipedia. But I am not Altai Khan and I never was banned. Is it forbidden to work as IP for a long time and to register one day??????

Wikipedia:Sock puppetry prohibits the use of multiple accounts to edit Wikipedia.`

You are wrong. Multiple accounts are not forbidden, misuses with multiple accounts are forbidden (e.g. voting at the same voting procedure or edit warring together with a sock puppet).

Please appeal your editing ban on the user talk page of your original account.

I cannot do that because I do not have an original account. AND I AM NOT ALTAI KHAN

So am I really banned now? FOR WHAT????????????????? NPOVfan (talk) 18:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NPOVfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I am not Altai Khan.

Decline reason:

Please provide evidence about this, because otherwise, your similar contributions leads us to be suspicious. — Soxred 93 23:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.