User talk:Nima Lhamo

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 11:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kautilya3!^^ I'll do my best to contribute to Wikipedia without breaking any rules, and I appreciate your suggestions on how to improve my editing. Nima Lhamo (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! Baltistan is under-served area. It is good to have new editors. If you need help with anything, please feel free to ask. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; I'll sure do. Nima Lhamo (talk) 02:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mayfung has been accepted

Mayfung, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:41, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! Congratulations, Nimaji! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this issue, unless you have seen problems of display with any devices, I don't think we need them any more. We have plenty of Tibetan script material all over Wikipedia. Since it is part of Unicode, which all web-browsers generally have, no special support is needed in my opinion.

On the other hand, it would be good to use the {{lang..}} template wherever "foreign" language scripts are used, so that the readers can know which language they are in. Hovering over the script tells that.

It is also useful to minimize or reduce the sidebar templates so that they don't occupy a lot of screen space and push out other useful images. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see, Kautilya3; no, I didn't have any display issues; I saw this template on other articles with Tibetan texts and assumed it was necessary, but thank you for explaining it to me. Nima Lhamo (talk) 11:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Cyber.Eyes.2005 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cyber.Eyes.2005. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 12:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nima Lhamo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have I been blocked? I merely wanted to contribute to Wikipedia; I didn't make any disruptive or destructive additions, and yet I was still prohibited. I beg the administrators to unblock me, please. You can block me if my edits to Wikipedia are disruptive or unhelpful. Please conduct a behavioural analysis; I simply want to edit Wikipedia, please.

Decline reason:

The reason for your block is literally explained right above this unblock request. Yamla (talk) 19:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nima Lhamo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please tell me, What can I do to be unblocked? Nima Lhamo (talk) 00:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Address the issues behind the block in your unblock request. It's not a guarantee of getting unblocked but it has more of a chance than what you've been doing. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nima Lhamo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Daniel Case: I apologise for breaking Wikipedia's sock puppetry rules. I'm asking the administrators for a second chance since I simply want to contribute to Wikipedia and I swear I won't break any of its rules or make any destructive edits. Please give me another chance; you may continue to monitor me. I swear that going forward I won't break any of Wikipedia's rules. Back then, I wasn't mature enough to understand the rules but that wouldn't happen again. please, give me another chance Nima Lhamo (talk) 09:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Due to extensive socking, the only possible road to an unblock is the standard offer. Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nima Lhamo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Ponyo: I am reaching out to appeal an unblock request through the standard offer. I want to express my sincere apologies for my past mistakes regarding Wikipedia's sockpuppetry policy. I acknowledge that I was wrong, and I humbly request a second chance from the administrators. My only intention was to contribute positively to Wikipedia. While I have been involved in sockpuppetry, I want to emphasize that I have never made any unconstructive or disruptive edits here. Administrators can review my contributions, as they will reflect my genuine efforts to contribute positively. When I initially registered as Cyber.Eyes.2005, I was not aware of Wikipedia's sockpuppetry policy, which led me to become involved in it unintentionally. I received a level-2 warning on my talk page from Aman.kumar.goel as the first message. At that time, I also lacked understanding about providing proper references and citations, which resulted in repetitive mistakes. Despite this, I assure you that all my edits were made in good faith. I deeply regret my previous errors and sincerely request an opportunity to rectify them. Looking back, I realize that I lacked the necessary maturity to make valuable contributions. However, I have learned from my mistakes. If granted a second chance, I am committed to contributing responsibly and constructively to Wikipedia. I hope to be given the chance to demonstrate my dedication to being a positive contributor to this community. Nima Lhamo (talk) 16:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You are banned, not just blocked (under WP:3X) due to your extensive abuse. Additionally, you need to be making this request with your original account. Yamla (talk) 17:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.