User talk:Nmbaran

Welcome!

Hello, Nmbaran, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Ganeshk (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Adkins-Regan has been accepted

Elizabeth Adkins-Regan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Have a cat (sorry if you don't like cats!)

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:02, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Josephine Ball) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Josephine Ball.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

I've added some standard things for finishing off a Wikipedia article: categories, an "authority control" tag allowing linking to her published works on library catalogues, a "defaultsort" tag (essentially indexing that Ball is her surname and Josephine is her first name) and tags on the talk page marking her article for attention of relevant working groups.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 21:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a follow up regarding Josephine Ball, please make sure you haven't includes any of your own opinions or analyses, which violate the core content policy of No original research. On Wikipedia, we summarize existing published knowledge and ideas, we do not present new ones, even if they are true. For instance the passage "Given that most... it is unlikely that Ball..." reads like it is your own analysis (who says it is unlikely?), not the accepted record (see improper synthesis of published sources). Take extreme care when using primary sources (e.g. individual papers) to make assertions (see primary, secondary and tertiary sources): the statement "one of the first papers on the role of hormones in learning and memory" should be sourced to a secondary source that makes this claim, not the paper itself. A good Wikipedia article will have no sense of an editorial "voice", in that all statements can be sourced directly to previously published work. Writing an encyclopedia is different from a review or research paper: since you have an academic background, please see advice for Expert editors and Wikipedia editing for research scientists. If you have questions, see the resources in your Welcome message above. Cheers, thanks for what you've provided, and happy editing! --Animalparty! (talk) 08:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]