User talk:Nrheg2016

May 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to NRHEG High School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: NRHEG High School was changed by Nrheg2016 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.896161 on 2014-05-08T16:31:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Blooming Prairie High School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —SMALL JIM 16:38, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Blooming Prairie High School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to NRHEG High School. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:45, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nrheg2016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had no idea that false things were being posted on this site by my account

Decline reason:

There are two possibilities: (1) you are lying, in which case we can't trust you to edit, or (2) you are telling the truth, in which case your account has been compromised by another person gaining access to it, in which case by Wikipedia policy the account must not be unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.