User talk:Onam2013
Welcome Onam2013!
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Onam2013, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi Onam2013! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
August 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kadal Kadannu Oru Maathukutty without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit removed the poster from the infobox; I restored that. Additionally, I'm not clear why you changed the reviews, when it looks like all the reviews are positive (or at least neutral). Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Mohanlal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 20:20 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Kunchacko Boban. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JK (talk) 10:12, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Jumping to your other account does not allow you to continue to edit war. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 10:35, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Revert yourself [1] and you will not be blocked immediately for edit warring and you will still be able to edit until the checkuser blocks you as a sock. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:54, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. and for edit warring again, length 72 hours. Vsmith (talk) 15:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Blocking him for life gets the job done. Blocking him temporarily (only so he can return to create mayhem) does not. He was already blocked twice temporarily earlier, but has not changed his attitude yet. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:36, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Please join the discussion
[edit]When you return from your edit warring block, please join the discussion Talk:Kunchacko_Boban#New_starting_point to make the case for your preferred version and do not begin restoring your favored content until you have shown a consensus among the editors. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)