User talk:Orlando.Phillips

Stop being inappropriate

Hello, just wanted to let you know that you should not be editing unconstructively. Thanks, Willuconquerto (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Preston Arsement, you may be blocked from editing. Joyous! Noise! 17:04, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: . Favonian (talk) 17:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Favonian, please may I be unblocked since this is not a vandalism-only account but I was logged into by another using my account and cracking my password using a C++ console app which I was not a part of. I will strive to undo any vandal attacks I caused to Wikipedia and subsequently positively contribute as an editor for Wikipedia. Orlando.Phillips (talk) 16:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orlando.Phillips (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will contribute only contsructively to Wikipedia!

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

eww

checkusery. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection to User talk:Willuconquerto? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You claim compromised. Alas, we do not unblock compromised accounts-- WP:COMPROMISED -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orlando.Phillips (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, indeed I am not compromised. Indeed unblock me because I do not deserve to be blocked. I am sad that I am blocked, because I do not deserve this.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orlando.Phillips (talk) 14:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]