User talk:Pekin Republican

Regarding your edits to East St. Louis, Illinois:

Your recent edit to East St. Louis, Illinois (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 20:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yung Butta - March 5th, 1987 - Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, United States

Childs - April 30th, 1987 - Corona, Queens, New York City, United States

DJ Pro Style - April 22nd, 1980 - Jamaica, Queens, New York City, United States

Terrence Jenkins - April 20th, 1983 - Jamaica, Queens, New York City, United States

Lil Mama - Ocotber 4th, 1989 - East New York, Brooklyn, New York City, New York, United States

Lakroukro

Stop creating unsourced attack pages. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nigger is sourced and your word is not. Give me some sources. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Lakroukro, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 01:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing "wrong" with us. You haven't provided any reliable sources that show that anything you wrote in your article is true. Please read our policy on verifiability, which is not negotiable. All articles must be verifiable. I tried searching on Google for "Lakroukro" and there is not a single mention of it anywhere on the web. If this were a notable incident and a widely used term it would likely have at least some mention on the web. Until you have some sources that you can add to the article it cannot be included on Wikipedia. Continually recreating this article in its current state will result in you being blocked. Please do not create it again in its current form. Thanks, Gwernol 01:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure you read what about a reliable source is on Wikipedia. Blogs, forums and personal websites are not considered reliable. You need several published, independent sources, for example in a newspaper or similar. You can only recreate the article if you have multiple sources of this nature. Thanks, 01:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwernol (talk • contribs)

Again, please read out policy on verifiability. Forums and blogs are not reliable sources because anyone could put anything on them. To avoid publishing articles based on hoaxes we must have sources we can rely on to show that the subject of an article is true. By the way, I am baffled by your comment "You can always believe a white person but never a black person". Are you trying to suggest my editing is motivated by racism? If so, i will ask you to retract that accusation, which I find deeply offensive. If you are trying to suggest something else, I'd appreciate it if you would explain what exactly. Thanks, Gwernol 02:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Astrology Edits

Please stop adding astrology trivia to biographical articles. Thanks you. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 06:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a supermarket tabloid. Your additions are entirely unencyclopedic. Please stop. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 06:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dhalsim

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. JuJube (talk) 23:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Daphne Maxwell Reid. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 18:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Char'roolz Tailer

A tag has been placed on Char'roolz Tailer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Atlan (talk) 13:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daphne Maxwell Reid

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Daphne Maxwell Reid, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Atlan (talk) 13:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of D.O.X.

A tag has been placed on D.O.X. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | ^talk 22:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I-20 (DTP)

Do you want this deleted like it appears all of your other work? If not, try actually addressing the item listed in the template. That is, source the content and make the article conform to notability guidelines. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monrovia, Liberia

Hi! I found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nintendo&diff=206576346&oldid=206557812

Next time please source your edits. Nintendo doesn't HAVE a Liberian division; it's website indicates Nintendo Europe as the distributor in Liberia. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also I added a PROD to Tee_Yungstah because it doesn't seem to be notable. 18:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC) I also added a PROD to this Henogbah - No references. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC) And I PRODed this too I-20 (DTP) WhisperToMe (talk) 19:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you are going to need sources in order to prove he is notable and to save the article. See Wikipedia:Notability WhisperToMe (talk) 19:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You said: "I just gave you sources. If you can google it and if you can see it on the internet then those are sources, not anything that's made up." - I don't see links to books. I don't see links to reliable sources. Look at Barack Obama article and see the kinds of sources in it. News articles, journals, etc. WhisperToMe (talk) 19:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not exist to promote other people. See Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox and Wikipedia:Notability_(people) WhisperToMe (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Those other guys have reliable sources and notability, so their articles are not "promotion." WhisperToMe (talk) 14:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Pekin, please read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (people) - I deleted, without discussion, your latest page as it was an unsourced negative Wikipedia:BLP with no explanation about why the person was notable. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, simply existing is not enough for this website; it has to be notable. It has to have reliable sources. Let me see if Jin and Immortal Technique have reliable sources too (if they do, they stay - if not, I add a PROD) WhisperToMe (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Immortal Technique has been covered by groups like AlJazeera News and the Village Voice. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia talk:Talk page. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 04:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jay Supreme (rapper)

A tag has been placed on Jay Supreme (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I-20 (rapper)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to I-20 (rapper), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DiverseMentality 08:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I-20 is Liberian. His parents are Liberian. Ask him yourself. PR Dece/28th/2008' 3:58 A.M. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pekin Republican (talk • contribs) 08:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All content must be verifiable and backed up with reliable sources. If you can't cite it, it's best left out of the article. DiverseMentality 09:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ That's a North Trenton Movie (2008)

From School Battles to Street Battles, Freestyle Battling has never been the same.

Tee Yungstah M-Dollar Inspector Lee Tyler Leigh Gizelle Munez Lil' Divine Five Trey DJ Eazy Sunny Boy De Square Tragedy Styles Hollow Jay Focus C. Fashion Jaze Juce

Speedy deletion of P-Dubb Mancini

A tag has been placed on P-Dubb Mancini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Rtphokie (talk) 03:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with P-Dubb Mancini. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rtphokie (talk) 03:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "2C (Rapper)"

A page you created, 2C (Rapper), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Matt (talk) 03:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grind Time

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Grind Time, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable competition. Fails WP:RS. WP:N.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chris DeShields

A tag has been placed on Chris DeShields requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Khalfani Khaldun 09:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Young Jeezy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 23:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of P-Dub Mancini

A tag has been placed on P-Dub Mancini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wperdue (talk) 02:32, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2C (rapper)

A tag has been placed on 2C (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wperdue (talk) 02:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Liberia

You realize Liberia isn't a territory of the United States, right? --Golbez (talk) 03:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to I-20 (rapper). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Σxplicit 03:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you get blocked. Looks like you don't read your talk page. But you keep violating BLP policy. Sad that we've tolerated it this long, really. JBsupreme (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linking dates

Please do not link dates, as you did here. Linking dates is a deprecated practice and should no longer be linked per WP:UNLINKDATES. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 05:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hipco

The article Hipco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Like many new styles or genres of music, this is not notable and would probably be deleted at WP:AfD per WP:OUTCOMES

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 22:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bearian (talk) 22:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Hipco

I have nominated Hipco, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hipco. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. GlassCobra 15:47, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

Please do not alter genres in articles of biographies without discussion. Under Template:Infobox musical artist#Genre, it clearly states to aim for generality (e.g. Hip hop rather than East Coast hip hop). You've done this numerous times throughout several articles, please stop. This is your only warning for disruptive editing, and any further edits may result in a block. — ξ ^xplicit 01:39, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from changing music genres, as you did to Not Afraid, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Continued genre changes to suit your own point of view may result in a block. Thank you. Red Flag on the Right Side 00:31, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recovery

Last time I checked Eminem is from freaking detroit. Its not a southern hip hop sound. Red Flag on the Right Side 03:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OR because thats what your giving me plus we aim for straight up Hip Hop and not regional sub genres. Red Flag on the Right Side 03:35, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:36, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 01:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 1961, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 1961, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tight Tight Why

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tight Tight Why requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Travelbird (talk) 21:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pekin Republican. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]