User talk:Phineas suratt

October 2019

Hello, I'm Eagles247. An edit that you recently made to Matt Hasselbeck seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:29, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas L. Phillips (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional citation from independent and reliable sources are essential.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas L. Phillips and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thomas L. Phillips, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Phineas suratt! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 06:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Phineas suratt/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Phineas suratt/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas L. Phillips

Hi, your recently-created article Thomas L. Phillips has a number of issues:

It has no sources (tag has been added).
It appears to replicate the content of an external source with close paraphrasing (tag has been added).
The copyright of the image you had included is unclear: it is tagged on Commons as your 'own work', yet it is clearly a photograph of a painting, and unless you are the artist who painted it (?), or can demonstrate an appropriate license, the image is probably a copyright violation and should be removed; see here. I have commented out the image for now, awaiting your comments.

Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, do you know any good tutorials on how to write articles? I look online but most were too confusing. The picture is mine, as I am related to Mr. Phillips. If there is anyway you could help me fix this article that would be great. I understand of thats not your job. Thank you!

There are links to sources of help in the messages posted above this one. Please read them. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Phineas suratt. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Thomas L. Phillips, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:36, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas L. Phillips

Hello, Phineas suratt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas L. Phillips".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 08:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thomas L Phillips

Hello, Phineas suratt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas L Phillips, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]