Jump to content

User talk:PhorusFS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phuwin Tangsakyuen (May 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 13:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PhorusFS! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 13:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Kaleeb18 I've already edited it. Please review this article again. I hope you approve this article for publication. Thank you for your time. PhorusFS (talk) 09:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It seems as though the article's notability is still the same since I first reviewed it. In order for an article to be notable enough, reliable, independent sources must back up the article. Imdb, something related to Wikipedia, Youtube, and Netflix are not reliable sources. See WP:IMDB, WP:RSPYT, and WP:RSPWP. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 18:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your guidance. I've already improved article. PhorusFS (talk) 07:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kaleeb18 Thank you for your guidance. I've already improved article. Please review this article again. PhorusFS (talk) 10:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well I can't really tell now which sources are reliable or not now that they are all in Thai ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 12:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kaleeb18, I've already added reliable sources in English in an article. I hope it will enough to publish an article. Many thanks for considering my request. PhorusFS (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All I know with those refs are that Drama Wiki, Filmaffinity, Rakuten Viki, and Dramabop are not good sources ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 21:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kaleeb18 I've already improved it. Can you review an article again? PhorusFS (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but all those references are foreign, and I cannot tell anymore if they are reliable or not. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 11:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kaleeb18 What are all those references?? If you can't read you shouldn't be declined an article the first time. Do you decline cause you just don't know like that? I put some references in another language cause I'd like you to know he is famous in many countries. Anyway, I put many references in English are you still not understanding? Cause you don't know so, you decide it isn't reliable like this? PhorusFS (talk) 12:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but last time there were a lot less references. From past experiance, I could tell that a few of them were reliable and others were not. There is also this user script that helps detect unreliable sources which I found some last time I declined it. But it only detects it if it has been brought up at WP:RSN. In the newer version of the article I can tell filmaffinity is not a reliable source, but L'Officiel Thailand is. Some of them are also primary sources. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 17:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I figured out you can google translate them and it looks like gmmtv, madan, xenews,camphub,monomax, and is not reliable. Dara daily I will not look at because just taking a glimpse at its adds were inappropriate. Also Kazz magazine looks somewhat reliable as well as MGR online. That was just a quick look. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 17:51, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kaleeb18 Did you really read the article, right? If you really read the article you won't decide that source of GMMTV is unreliable. Cause GMMTV is an agent of him. I wonder how reliable you are working? PhorusFS (talk) 06:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I should really say GMTV does not add notability to the subject since it is a primary refKaleeb18TalkCaleb 11:45, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phuwin Tangsakyuen has been accepted

[edit]
Phuwin Tangsakyuen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 11:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]