User talk:Pmlineditor/Archive 5
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Pmlineditor. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
- News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Airplaneman (talk) 12:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
that's my userpage and i'm not a "sock puppet" so leave it alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.167.103.158 (talk) 15:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh dear, I saw this and am not happy that someone is impersonating me... *sigh* BTW, my IP is 192.168.1.70. Regards, Airplaneman (talk) 02:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Hopkins School of Medicine article
The information about the Colleges and the Peabody award are both accurate. If anything, just add references to them.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.251.29 (talk • contribs)
- OK. Feel free to revert. Pmlineditor 15:46, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Tree of life garden
An article that you have been involved in editing, Tree of life garden, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tree of life garden. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Romance section from PJ character page
I played around with the part about Calypso in my sandbox. Feel free to stop by and tell me what you think before I change it in the article. Thanks! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 01:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just out of curiosity, why do you think the section should be shortened? Thanks for the feedback! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 19:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- It's way unimportant and should not be long. Pmlineditor 06:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I'm going to disagree with you on this. I'm trying to make the section as concise and streamlined as possible, but the very fact that Rick Riordan wrote a romance line into the plot makes it important. I know that to a guy that may seem fairly minor, but it is a subplot, which makes it necessary on his page. Like I said, I'll try to make it concise, but I will be adding all the necessary plot details. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrincessofLlyr (talk • contribs) 14:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Look, I don't care about "to a guy"... My point is that the romance section should not exceed the other sections in length. It should be about 2k, not 4k. It should be assigned equal importance as any other section in the article. Cheers, and don't forget to sign. Pmlineditor 15:50, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- PrincessofLlyr asked me to give something of a WP:3O on this. Here I go. I think the romance line is definitely important, although important does not equal big. I suggest shortening the ones on Calypso and Rachel a bit more because those sections have some un-relevant information as well as putting the events in chronological order in Annabeth's section (which I think is a good length considering the relationship between the two is described with much more detail throughout the series). I'll edit the page and show you guys the diff (will be done in about 30 mins). It can always be reverted if needed. Cheers, Airplaneman talk 23:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, here's the diff. It's only reduced by 10 bytes mainly because I added lots of links. I streamlined it as much as possible. I think it will be ready for integration into the main article space soon. Please tell me what you think guys. Airplaneman talk 23:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Looks good. I might change some small things when I've read through it a few more times. Thanks for the help! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 23:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, here's the diff. It's only reduced by 10 bytes mainly because I added lots of links. I streamlined it as much as possible. I think it will be ready for integration into the main article space soon. Please tell me what you think guys. Airplaneman talk 23:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- PrincessofLlyr asked me to give something of a WP:3O on this. Here I go. I think the romance line is definitely important, although important does not equal big. I suggest shortening the ones on Calypso and Rachel a bit more because those sections have some un-relevant information as well as putting the events in chronological order in Annabeth's section (which I think is a good length considering the relationship between the two is described with much more detail throughout the series). I'll edit the page and show you guys the diff (will be done in about 30 mins). It can always be reverted if needed. Cheers, Airplaneman talk 23:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Look, I don't care about "to a guy"... My point is that the romance section should not exceed the other sections in length. It should be about 2k, not 4k. It should be assigned equal importance as any other section in the article. Cheers, and don't forget to sign. Pmlineditor 15:50, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I'm going to disagree with you on this. I'm trying to make the section as concise and streamlined as possible, but the very fact that Rick Riordan wrote a romance line into the plot makes it important. I know that to a guy that may seem fairly minor, but it is a subplot, which makes it necessary on his page. Like I said, I'll try to make it concise, but I will be adding all the necessary plot details. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrincessofLlyr (talk • contribs) 14:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- It's way unimportant and should not be long. Pmlineditor 06:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Reader.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Reader.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Pmlineditor 18:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Sniper
Hi I've undoed your edit, its not immediately clear how the Ninjas were "targeting" from concealed positions. I added the additional information for clarification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.152.8 (talk) 17:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Your GA nomination of Brisingr
Thanks! User:NuclearWarfare offered to do a review a few days ago too, so you might want let him know that you're reviewing it. :) Theleftorium 15:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Already Done via IRC. Pmlineditor 15:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Could you please see my most recent comment on Talk:Brisingr? Thanks, NW (Talk)
For better and faster discussion between WikiProject Software Members a IRC channel has been created: irc://irc.freenode.net/##WikiProject-Software. For instant access click here: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=##WikiProject-Software. Please use your Wikipedia nickname. You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Software or one of its departments. - Kingpin13 (talk) 09:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for making WP:NODRAMA a success!
Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:
- T:TDYK for Did You Know nominations
- WP:GAC for Good Article nominations
- WP:FAC for Featured Article nominations
- WP:FLC for Featured List nominations
- WP:FPC for Featured Picture nominations
Again, thank you for making this event a success! --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 02:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Signature
Hello Pmlinediter! I see you are busy, so please look into this only if you have spare time. See, I was experimenting with my signature here and decided to give it a go and use it as my raw signature. In the preferences, I copied the thing from my sandbox to the signature line and checked the box underneath. I pressed save and it said that I had an invalid html or something. I don't have a clue when it comes to html, so I don't know what to fix. Since you look like you've done it before :), may you please take a look when you have a minute? Thanks, Airplaneman (talk) 02:34, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll try to fix it. Pmlineditor 08:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks so much!!! So It looks like all of the formatting has to go in the brackets. Thanks!
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Airplaneman (talk • contribs)
- Welcome, and don't forget to sign. ;) Pmlineditor 08:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Whoops, looks like I was too excited there :D.Airplaneman talk 23:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Welcome, and don't forget to sign. ;) Pmlineditor 08:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
You supported The Oregon Files, which has been selected as the Novels WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Month. Please help improve this article towards featured article standard. Alan16 (talk) 10:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Next-Genn-Gamer 13:39, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Simple English Help
I'll help. Jeremjay24 (talk) 23:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Great! Just create an account and start editing. Any questions - ask me on my tp. Regards, Pmlineditor 12:25, 1 August 2009 (UTC).
- From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
- Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
- Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
- Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
- News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
- Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Coordinator Election
Hello Kevin and Pmlin. At the moment (6 hours left of voting) it stands at: Kevin 15, myself 12, Pmlin 10. Baring some sort of miracle Kevin will likely win. So as long as you are happy to take up the position Kevin, you shall become lead co-ordinator, and myself and Pmlin shall become assistant co-ordinators. Is everyone happy with this arrangement? Regards, Alan16 (talk) 17:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC).
- Yeah, happy. Look forward to improving this project. :D Regards, Pmlineditor 17:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Everyone seems happy, so everyone working together should be able to improve the project. Regards, Alan16 (talk) 17:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC).
The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - July 2009
The July 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16(talk)
Banned?
I would like to know why I was recently issued with a "Last Warning" message as IO feel I do not deserve this and in my opinion I feel I made the correct edits.
- Checking contribs... Pmlineditor 16:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- r
- Well, your last edit was a blanking, so I think the template was deserved. Pmlineditor 16:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- r