User talk:Prateek Samantaray
February 2020
[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Avast Antivirus. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Denial-of-service attack. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 12:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit]
Hello, I'm Jamesrichards12345. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InstaSafe have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. James Richards (talk) 09:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InstaSafe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InstaSafe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James Richards (talk) 09:11, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.