Jump to content

User talk:Prisencolin/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14

"Thư" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thư. Since you had some involvement with the Thư redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 21:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Los Pollos Hermanos

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Los Pollos Hermanos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 13:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks--Prisencolin (talk) 17:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Walter White Jr.

You give me the sources, I'll expand this draft using them. Same for Draft:Marie Schrader. --Kailash29792 (talk) 15:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I personally wouldn’t get my hopes up for either of the pages would pass an AFD but I’ll see what I can do..—Prisencolin (talk) 06:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marie Schrader (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul characters instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedia, blog sites (such as AMCTV) and YouTube are not acceptable or reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Prisencolin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Dan arndt, please excuse Prisencolin. Can you, Prisencolin, at least complete the fictional character biography section before re-submitting it? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marie Schrader (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This draft is a request to spin off an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source.

This does not mean that the draft should be spun off, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun off. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article, Talk:List of Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul characters]. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.).

The creation of a separate article on Marie Schrader has not yet been discussed on the parent article talk page. Discuss there before resubmitting.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 11:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Los Pollos Hermanos

The article Los Pollos Hermanos you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Los Pollos Hermanos for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Prisencolin

Thank you for creating Suicide by starvation.

User:Dps04, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

There is already a much more detailed description of suicide by starvation at Suicide methods#Starvation, so what little this article contains can be selectively merged to that article, or to List of suicides. Therefore, I am converting this short article into a redirect with possibilities for the time being, without prejudice to you converting this back into an article, provided that you can significantly expand upon its contents. Thanks~~

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dps04}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dps04 (talk) 15:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2015 in League of Legends

Notice

The article 2015 in League of Legends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTSTATS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 May newsletter

The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
  • England Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
  • Botswana The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
  • Somerset Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
  • England Lee Vilenski with 869 points, Gondor Hog Farm with 801, Venezuela Kingsif with 719, Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce with 710, United States Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and Mexico MX with 515.

The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zhang Dejiang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wang Yang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Politics of Hangzhou moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Politics of Hangzhou, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 05:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Guo Liang Chi has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 00:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City God Temple of Shanghai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold Mountain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

"Sharkie" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sharkie. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#Sharkie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Page of Xǔ (state) was changed name by someone

Do you think is weird someone moved the page to Xu (Henan)? Please move the page back to Xǔ (state)if you can. Thanks!K.b.cheng (talk) 13:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests#Uncontroversial_technical_requests
  • @Prisencolin: Need to delete the Xǔ (state) redirect first then move the Xu (Henan) to Xǔ (state). Now cannot move the Xu (Henan) because the name of Xǔ (state) was using. Cannot use the name of province to mention in the page of state, that was wrong, the person of move the page name was totally corrupt the politic and geographic. Make it delete the Xǔ (state) page first, if still cannot delete both and you create one of Xǔ (state). I got backup the page. K.b.cheng (talk) 00:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kyle Bornheimer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy McGill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Mid laners has been nominated for renaming

Category:Mid laners has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Anarchyte (talk • work) 12:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

This nomination also includes the categories for the other four roles. Anarchyte (talk • work) 13:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Li (surname)

I don't understand the rationale behind your move of Li (surname) to List of surnames romanized Li. Can you explain in greater detail how WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT connects with your move? To me it seems conceivable that people might actually search up the former article name because the "SUBJECT (DISAMBIG)" format is the standard here. The latter name isn't particularly intuitive at all. Are you planning to perform similar moves for all of the Chinese surname articles as well? bibliomaniac15 00:50, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Nevermind, I misinterpreted and saw that your target name was actually to Li (surname 李). It makes more sense considering how common it is, but I think you probably should have listed this in WP:RM first because the format of this whole thing was decided in an RFC before. bibliomaniac15 00:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
You're free to revert my page move, but I don't think I did anything against the consensus established by the RFC. It was specifically about disambiguation for the individual articles, not the name of the umbrella/disambiguation article itself.--Prisencolin (talk)
I honestly don't feel strongly enough about it to revert because the 木子李 variant is so overwhelmingly common. I do think you should clean up a bit and fix double redirects in Special:WhatLinksHere/Li_(surname) though. If we've made our bed, we may as well sleep in it. bibliomaniac15 03:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cao (Chinese surname) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Division, Department, Central and Group
List of Korean surnames (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to 林
Xu (surname) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ding Yi
Zhang (surname) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Zhang Wei

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Korean surnames, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 林 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:42, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Shui (surname)

As the page clearly states any entry should have an article in the English Wikipedia. We do not do lists that point to nowhere and may contain wrong entries. If you can write it, or get an article written, then by all means. Note that links to other Wikipedias are not acceptable as they are not reliable sources. -- Alexf(talk) 20:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

How about you help out by creating articles, instead of repealing information that will take time to replace in the future. Thanks.--Prisencolin (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
What does that mean? I wrote more than 200 articles, but that is irrelevant. We have rules as you know. They rules must be followed by all, you and me included. Also please consider you could be close to violation 3RR which is another serious rule to be followed.
We seem to disagree. Feel free to discuss it in the article's Talk Page or at ANI. Note that I take personal exception of being called a nazi. As a Jew I find it offensive and reprehensible. The comment had to be redacted. Again feel free to discuss it at ANI, but please do not call other editors by offensive names again. -- Alexf(talk) 21:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Shui (surname). Alexf(talk) 00:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Shui (surname) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Liz Read! Talk! 05:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chinese compound surname (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Sima and Shangguan
Zeng (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cangshan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your edits on the Chinese surname articles! Efforts appreciated -- Dps04 (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yang Shiwo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clan name (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Plain Blue Banner has been nominated for deletion

Category:Plain Blue Banner has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 July newsletter

The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
  • Botswana The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
  • England Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.

Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, Denmark MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kinesma

Hello, Prisencolin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kinesma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of League of Legends champions (July 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of League of Legends champions (2nd nomination) Discuss at League of Legends if this needs to be revisited as a split article.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:50, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Prisencolin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:50, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Your edits at League of Legends universe and lore, specifically this one, triggered a report at CopyPatrol.

I'm still trying to sort out what happened but I think it was triggered because you are copying a lot of material from League of Legends. that's permitted but it has to follow rules to make sure that attribution is maintained.

I'll copy below my standard response when I see such a situation, can you look into it and see if I'm off base?

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.S Philbrick(Talk) 16:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Michael De Santa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael De Santa. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Michael De Santa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael De Santa. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael De Santa (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I plan to accept this draft after the reference errors are corrected. The trimming of fancruft being done by another reviewer can be done in article space after acceptance. But we have to get the reference errors corrected first.

This draft has one or more reference errors, which indicate errors in the formatting or use of the references. The reference errors should be corrected before resubmitting this draft. If this draft is resubmitted without correcting the reference errors, it will be Rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitter.

See Referencing for Beginners for instructions on how to format references.

If you do not know how to correct the reference errors, you may ask for help at the Teahouse or the Help Desk.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 22:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Future of Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament Choir and Orchestra page

Hello, sorry for bothering you. In case you have not received a notification in my reply to the furture of the said page, I have copied the message here. Though some most of this message is directed at User:Ajf773, you have been involved in some decision making, and so I am letting you know of what I feel:

Just in reply to Ajf773, you mentioned that the CBS is not mentioned in the Catholic Cathedral's Wikipedia page. Granted, this is true. However, though it isn't much, the CBS is stated in the Wikipedia page of St Mary's Pro-Cathedral. The Basillica's Wikipedia page, I think should solely be about the building and its history, as to why the CBS has its own Wikipedia page ... just a thought. Also mentioned, the CBS aren't notable. I would disagree with this as they were given the status of cultural ambassadors by the New Zealand government and have been on numerous World tours, including performing for the Mass at St Peter's Basilica in the Vatican (..."80 members of the touring group were invited to lead the singing in St Peter’s for the Papal Christmas Midnight Mass to inaugurate the Holy Year of Jubilee." [1]) and at Notre Dame in Paris. If they weren't notable, I don't think they would have ever been given this permission or opportunity to do so. On a domestic/local level, the choir and orchestra are well known within the various church and music organisations in NZ, as well as some orchestral players even employed at the Christchurch Symphony Orchestra. I hope this has changed your mind somewhat, but I see two other wikipedians have suggested it be merged with a building that will in future be demolished - something the CBS will no longer be apart of. I hope you are well. Lord A.Nelson (talk) 04:46, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Looking forward to hearing from you. Thank you for your help!! Lord A.Nelson (talk) 05:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Information icon Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Runeterra. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

I'm about ready to issue a disruption warning about all of these League of Legend cruft articles you keep trying to sneak under the radar. With the "Lore and settings" AFD headed towards a delete, and the list of champions being rejected by AFC (as well as past AFDs), I cannot believe you created the "Champion" article without knowing it would be opposed. -- ferret (talk) 22:56, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

What in the world are you doing with League of Legends universe and lore? I'm seriously considering a block right now. Stop. -- ferret (talk) 22:57, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
That article wasn’t being debating in the AFD, so it’s entirely unrelated to the AFD.—Prisencolin (talk) 23:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Please, save it. You moved Runeterra to that article, then tried to move it back through draftspace and "redefine it" as the AFD didn't go your way. It's clearly an attempt to game the system, and if you don't stop, it'll result in a block. -- ferret (talk) 23:42, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Well it looks like we're not going to resolve it here so I'm taking this to WP:DRV. Starting with League of Legends champion. If you actually read the article you'll see it's entirely different from the List of League of Legends champions list which was debated in previous AFD's.--Prisencolin (talk) 23:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Prisencolin, I'm looking at this by request and it doesn't look good. Here's the carrot: You need to back away for a few days and let the content processes sort out what should happen instead of taking this stuff into your own hands. What you have been doing is really disruptive. Please, stand down.
Here is the stick: The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, I will block you. Please stop. --Izno (talk) 02:32, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
How am I supposed to know this was "disruptive" it's not even against any of the rules on AFD. The topic was entirely separate from the Runeterra article.--Prisencolin (talk) 03:46, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
You made a mess across both mainspace and non-mainspace pages and did so while there is a review of whether that content is appropriate. That's not against the "rules on AFD", that's not how we expect editors to behave. --Izno (talk) 14:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
@Izno: This was an honest mistake on my part. I didn't like the title that was being debated at AFC as it wasn't WP:COMMONNAME so I made the switch. Just because you clearly WP:DONTLIKE the topic of the articles doesn't mean it's a "mess" and I can't at least make draft space content about it, there's clearly more room for experimentation in that space.--Prisencolin (talk) 15:00, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Actually, I'm not here because I like or don't like it, which is irrelevant. You made an actual mess that I cleaned up. That's how people get blocked. Now that I see it, you need to stop talking about other editors. The next time you talk about an editor in an edit, I'll block for that too. --Izno (talk) 15:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Sure I'll agree to stop doing that but the same goes for other users in the debate as well.--Prisencolin (talk) 15:59, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Riot Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstate 405 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

"Elise Zaavan" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Elise Zaavan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 3#Elise Zaavan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 14:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Champion (League of Legends) (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The concept of a Champion is minor WP:GAMECRUFT that fails What Wikipedia is not. You may want to consider expanding the article's scope to Gameplay of League of Legends in a similar manner to every article in Category:Gameplay of specific video games. Champions could be a part of that. But a standalone article on Champions, I don't see being a thing.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of works of fiction which have universities and colleges

Hello, Prisencolin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of works of fiction which have universities and colleges".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:100 Thieves logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100 Thieves logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Champion (League of Legends) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Champion (League of Legends) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Champion (League of Legends) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Origen logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Origen logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Carbon (Halo team) players

A tag has been placed on Category:Carbon (Halo team) players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo Championship Series logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halo Championship Series logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited League of Legends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcove.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert Evans (journalist)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert Evans (journalist) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@Sturmvogel 66: Thanks for the effort.—-Prisencolin (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

  • Free Hong Kong Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
  • IndonesiaHaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
  • England Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:2015 in the Los Angeles metropolitan area has been nominated for merging

Category:2015 in the Los Angeles metropolitan area has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert Evans (journalist)

The article Robert Evans (journalist) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Robert Evans (journalist) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Burnt Norton (house)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Burnt Norton (house) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 10:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Burnt Norton (house)

The article Burnt Norton (house) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Burnt Norton (house) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 11:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert Evans (journalist)

The article Robert Evans (journalist) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert Evans (journalist) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Momofuku restaurants logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Momofuku restaurants logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 02:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Prisencolin/Archive_11&oldid=1113383797"