User talk:RABBIT XVII

Welcome!

Hello, RABBIT XVII, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kalvin Wilson, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 23:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kalvin Wilson

The article Kalvin Wilson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 23:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Do not edit the page of RABBIT (Kalvin Wilson), only edit Kalvin Wilson, thanks. Wgolf (talk) 23:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at RABBIT (Kalvin Wilson). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. This content is at Kalvin Wilson, it doesn't need to be at RABBIT (Kalvin Wilson) as well. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Kalvin Wilson, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 00:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Kalvin Wilson. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did at Kalvin Wilson. Adding a link yo the article is NOT a reliable source. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Gornbein

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jon Gornbein, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://theboombox.com/frenchie-shake-clap-video/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, RABBIT XVII. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kalvin Wilson, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:RABBIT_XVII reported by User:Joseph2302 (Result: ). Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 02:03, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]