User talk:RaNdOm26/Archive 3

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #13

The January issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bugger

That was a waste of an hour! :) I put a template up but I guess you had already started. Where are you going next? •Florrie•leave a note• 12:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll stick to the middle and do 2000. •Florrie•leave a note• 12:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be silly! Do as many as you want, less work for Alex! I'll do 2000 tonight and then confer tomorrow. Cheers, •Florrie•leave a note• 12:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll bags 2001 and 2002 for today unless anyone has started on them? I'll go and add an under construction tag. Cheers, •Florrie•leave a note• 01:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC) (cross-post)[reply]

Artists with multiple entries

I do like tables, but I wonder if this might be over-kill? The sortable table makes it possible to view bands with multiple entries so to me the list already present is sufficient. But that is only my opinion. Why not bring it up on the 2007 talk page? There seems to be a few editors there willing to give an opinion. It does look nice, though! :) •Florrie•leave a note• 08:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sure. RaNdOm26 (talk) 08:12, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wasabi-EyeOfTheTiger.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wasabi-EyeOfTheTiger.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:82876653692.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:82876653692.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:82876729922.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:82876729922.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:82876740522.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:82876740522.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:82876768372.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:82876768372.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chess (application)

Hello and thanks for your message on my Talk page. If you don't mind, I would propose that we continue this discussion directly there, where you can find my answer. Happy editing! SyG (talk) 10:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:88697004122.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:88697004122.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:88697047942.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:88697047942.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:88697049352.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:88697049352.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fergie-BigGirlsDontCry.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fergie-BigGirlsDontCry.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Corrs

Hey, I'd noticed you raised several issues in regards to The Corrs, which I feel that has been addressed now. Please take a look here and the article itself and leave a comment. Thanks. σмgнgσмg ^(talk) 05:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #14

The February issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Silverchair discography

I've dealt with everything; can you take another look please. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 06:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All your stuff has been dealt with; could you possibly strike your oppose? Thanks again, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 10:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So did I help you with what I did when I contributed as an IP user? RaNdOm26 (talk) 11:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review for What Goes Around.../...Comes Around

I left a couple of questions there. Thanks for the review. --Efe (talk) 11:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its fine. Though Im a bit excited, I can wait. Regarding your querries, I think these links will be helpful for you:

Good luck on reviewing. Cheers! --Efe (talk) 00:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A helping hand

Hey i just noticed you adding a source, thats correctly formated too!!!!!!! Ive been working hard on that article and have put it up for GA. Its going to be judged very soon, it'l probably pass but if the sources were formatted it would defo pass im sure, i cant formatt sources though. Is there a chance you could formatt them for me, i would really appreciate it. Realist2 (talk) 06:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll help out with the formatting. RaNdOm26 (talk) 06:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, thankyou , thankyou, I literally have created much of the "Thriller 25" section and about a Third of the original thriller section. It would mean a lot to get it all formatted. Realist2 (talk) 06:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here my edit history to show how much time ive dedicated to it lol.My edit HIStory. Realist2 (talk) 06:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey the GA review is just around the corner. It will probably be put on hold, could you do some more work with citation formation if you have the time to spare, in the world of wiki im actually begging you. Realist2 (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AUS tagging for songs

Was wondering - why did you remove the tag for many song articles? Songs like Steer (song), These Kids and In This Life (song) should be under the Australian Wikiproject, because they are by Australian artists, so why did you remove them? RaNdOm26 (talk) 07:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

It was a mistake, so revert me if you find any others. The background to this is Satyrbot tagged every article that was in Category:Number-one singles in Australia with the AUS project tag, but the vast majority were in no way Australian from the point of view of project responsibility. The list that Satyrbot worked from was at User:Moondyne/AU categories which was fine for the category tagging but needed to be culled somewhat for article tagging. I've started manually removing the tags with assistance from AWB, and trying to leave the Australian songs tagged. I reckon there's still heaps more to untag BTW. Regards. —Moondyne click! 01:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #15

The March issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Gauci

Nice work...was working on a rewrite myself, but was beaten to it! :) Let's go towards GA (onwards?)? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 09:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) and yeah let's go to GA with this! RaNdOm26 (talk) 10:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:82876685972.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:82876685972.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:82876804802.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:82876804802.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:82876825722.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:82876825722.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:88697012092.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:88697012092.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Australia season 01-02

You can just copy yours over. Mine was just a placeholder, using the data from the SHEM cumulative article. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 13:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, good luck. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 13:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go. Avoid using kts. It'd be great if all of the Gary Padgett refs could be replaced with a more official one, but if not it's fine. Chris section needs major expansion (potentially worthy of its own article). ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #16

The April issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #17

The May issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United World Chart and the Maroon 5 discography

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United World Chart says it all really, there is no sign of reliability or notability of the chart. Its rating scheme was also found to be rather arbitrary; any reason you want to keep it in the discography? indopug (talk) 15:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]