User talk:RajSuvrat

Welcome!

Hello, RajSuvrat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 03:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arkesta (theatre)

Hello, RajSuvrat. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Arkesta (theatre), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Adarsh Commercial Institute (Siwan)"

Adarsh Commercial Institute (Siwan), a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular..

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. DrBungle (talk) 07:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SUVRAT RAJ. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 08:03, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Adarsh Commercial Institute (Siwan), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of SUVRAT RAJ (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 08:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adarsh institute certificate.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Adarsh institute certificate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Humble plea to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RajSuvrat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, The account with user name "SUVRAT RAJ" was my account. But Sir, when I made that account I didn't know about rules and policies of Wikipedia. But now, Sir, I know what actually Wikipedia is!! So, Sir In my account "RajSuvrat" I always tried to contribute wiki positively. So, sir, it my humble request to unblock my all accounts which have been blocked due to my faults. I assure you that I would never be do wrong. Thank you RajSuvrat (talk) 09:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nope, but we'd consider extending our WP:STANDARDOFFER to you. That means no more editing of any kind, no more abusive WP:SOCK accounts, for six months. Yamla (talk) 09:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My concerns are that not only were you abusively and very deliberately evading your block but your edits were also inappropriate. Copyright violations, inappropriate articles, etc. So, you haven't learnt your lesson at all, not yet. I'm hopeful you'll decide to take advantage of our standard offer. --Yamla (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will never do mistake

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RajSuvrat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, I am again saying that I have read it's terms and conditions. Sir, I have created many articles like Gadhdevi Maa Temple, Siwan, kolhu and I want to contribute more. So, please unblock me. if I will do any violent again, then u may block me, indefinitely.RajSuvrat (talk) 11:07, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are already blocked indefinitely. you were offered, above, the chance to take the standard offer, which I suggest you accept.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.