User talk:Retiono Virginian/Archive two

This is an archive of past dicussions from Retiono Virginians talk page. The past 20 dicussions are archived here. Please do not modify it. Retiono Virginian 14:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not nonsense

Noobscape as an attack is not nonsense, Noob is a disparaging remark, and the article is directing towards Runescape implying all who play it are noobs. The Kinslayer 19:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Retiono Virginian,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have 192 mainspace edits. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 15:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I said 190 mainspace edits please see this for your edit count as I post this you have 192 mainspace and 489 total edits the creator of vandalproof requires 250 mainspace edits. I am being fair. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A little late...

It is only mainspace edits. You have 202 now. (Click here) and look under main to see. I run into the same problem. I only have 120. I forgot my previous username and email adress :( that had 560 edits so I have to work up to that. Another thing that you might want to look into after you have 500 edits is the auto wiki browser. So on behalf of us low edit people that's why. RED skunk ^TALK

03:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

RFA

Well the reason why I'm not applying for an RFA for a few months is because many of my edits are in user talk, I only have about 1,700 mainspace edits and I want to wait until the right time as I've previously had a failed RFA so I don't want it to look like I'm desperate, I'd prefer to wait until I think its the right time - Thanks for your comments.Telly addict^{Editor review!} 17:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Help

Noted, warned editor in question again. Will monitor and see if futher follow-up action is required. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 16:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Everything is fine. The user seems to have took a hint and stopped vandalising. Retiono Virginian 16:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, noted his indef block. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 14:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WinLIKE Deletion

Please help to prevent WinLIKE deletion. Thanks for your past voting!
Here is the link: WinLIKE Deletion (84.185.211.19 14:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

You may wish to comment on the article's deletion review. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:24, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCartoon

I suppose it could work but I'm not good with MX-Flash and other animation creators so you may have to do it or get somebody to do it for you but you can ask me any questions on my talk page if you wish --Thanks!!Telly addict^{Editor review!} 15:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you are serious, I would sugegst explaining to Durova that you are not a vandal/troll or any other type of trouble-maker and that you are not trying to make an joke of wikipedia and improve it. I'm sure he/she will understand if you remain civil and friendly.Telly addict^{Editor review!} 13:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well If you are serious I'd ask permission first to make sure it's sticking to the rules.Telly addict^{Editor review!} 13:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Durova's comment wasn't an insult to you. It was saying that it'd be a bad idea to make a cartoon that recognizes the vandals per WP:DENY. She wasn't calling you a vandal or something like that. Metros232 13:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Retiono! I feel honored that you would consider me as a subject for such a thing however, I believe Durova's viewpoint has some merit. As much as it is great to recognize Wikipedia's constant efforts to fight vandalism, giving those vandals such fame by depicting them in a cartoon would make them feel as if they gained a special recognition regardless of being blocked/banned. I believe your intentions are very good and it wouldn't exactly bother me if you did go through with the idea. My advice though would be to reconsider it due to the possible unnecessary attention it would give to some highly disruptive editors. Thanks for checking in on it with me.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 22:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you make up some vandals instead? Acalamari 22:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would have thought that would just encourage people to take up their roles? I can appreciate Retiono's good intentions but I fear this idea wouldn't be successful. --YFB ¿ 00:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if some jokers use the made-up vandal names, they get blocked. Acalamari 00:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New template

I speedy deleted your new speedy deletion template, {{Db-hoax}}. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion, specifically WP:CSD#G1. Hoaxes are among the things listed as non-speedyable. Metros232 13:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Argh

You are the second person to ignore what i have said(no offense), and TRUST ME, He Knows. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 17:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See my report on him here> User:R9tgokunks\User:LUCPOL. It gives other links to other conversations as well as this : Portal_talk:Poland/Poland-related_Wikipedia_notice_board#Voivodeships_1921-1939 -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well i just noticed he is up to stalking me again... User_talk:Appleseed#Appreciation, and do you really think so? He seems to be trying to atone for his mistakes, but I am not sure if its genuine. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently he is making personal attacks at me, i think(i do not know what hes trying to get at?) I do not know what this is supposed to mean. See User_talk:R9tgokunks&redirect=no#You_want_war.3F. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, could you check my page history and my user page.......it seems hes a little angry... -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now he is adding "sockpuppet:r9tgokunks" tags to seemingly random IPs. I wonder if he knows of "checkuser" at all. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and i just checked his contributions and he has been part of a "Wikiproject:Silesia", in which he and only 1 other user are a part of, this could be a useful page for evidence. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 18:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems he's trying to revert our edits to the sockpuppet category on myself.I'd keep watch on those pages. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 19:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not supporting him, but he asked my help for translation, and he deserves to be heard, no matter if he is right or not.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 19:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He has not. And if you all don't stop this personal attacks, somebody may consider blocking all involved - you, LUCPOL and others - until you cool down.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 19:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attacks? I havent even done anything near that yet... anyway i found another sockpuppet, and its confirmed:

83.28.235.97 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))[1]

-- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 19:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per my previous comments, please take the matter to WP:MEDIATION. PD. One more note: the custom in RfArb is that you should not reply to others in their threads (statement), if you want, you can make addendums to your post - under your statement you can post your reply to other's statements (or their addendums).--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 21:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

I warned him and complained to WP:AIV and he was blocked anywayz I wish I was an admin it would really make my job easier..Cheers--Cometstyles 20:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm Maybe I'll Apply Next Month..Vote 4 Me Ok..hehe..Cheers..--Cometstyles 21:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GEE thanx my First Barnstar..Thank You Soo Much..--Cometstyles 21:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LUCPOL

I thought you would like to read my "enhanced" report on LUCPOL....i was very surprised at some of the new information i found pertaining to his past behavior.

The main page is at User:R9tgokunks\User:LUCPOL

-- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 21:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case

Hi. With regard to the arbitration request you filed yesterday concerning LUCPOL, as the party filing the case, you should notify all the other parties you named and provide them with a link to the case to allow them to respond. Please do so and then post to WP:RfAr with diffs to confirm that you have. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, Newyorkbrad 01:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert of BabyDweezil's talkpage

Hello. Please don't try to force BabyDweezil to keep those warnings on his page. He has already been blocked for a week in accordance with them, and they're accessible through the History anyway. Bishonen | talk 23:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Sig

Hi, you were right, the vandalism on the evening of 27th Feb. was high but I see you moved the Wdefcon to 1, I did this before when I was sort of new here, I though I should say its not common for it to move to 1, I think it should have stayed on 2 or 3 yesterday, I think 1 was a little too high, also your signature is not displayign properly, in your user preferences box be sure to check the raw signature box and I also think that the link where you opened it (I mean [[) should come after all the font colour, If you need sny more help please tell me. .Telly addict 15:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Yorkshire

I have added my name, I will be happy to help with general editng of the articles, you may wish to see [[Category:Wikipedians in Yorkshire]] and ask them if they maybe interested in joining, there is also a WikiProject West Yorkshire so some of the members there maybe interested in joining.Telly addict 19:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

indef-vandal

Thanks

for this. Nasty vandals. --Hojimachong^talk 00:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Welcome to me

While I appreciate the welcome to Wikipedia that you sent me, if you check my contributions page, you'll discover that I've been a member for over a year. I've just been relatively inactive in the area of editing. So thanks! But maybe check next time, eh? ^_~ oobug^talk/_contrib 00:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Monobook.js deletion

Next time, you can just blank your monobook.js page and it will have the same effect of deletion. Thanks! Sasquatch t|c 21:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fram Timbers

I have filed a report at WP:AIV and also mntioned that there is a high possibility that User:Longla, User:Elleandbee, User:Tommya3 are sockpuppets of the same user, hopefully they will be blocked soon.Telly addict 14:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that too, the page has been deleted and I'm going to keep an eye out at Special:Newpages for this page. Thanks for your help in this matter!!Tellyaddict 14:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]