User talk:Richard75/Archive 2013

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Richard75; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Sanctuary article

Hi. I am assuming that your name is Richard. How are you? in the article Sanctuary, you inserted a reference to an action by King James "21 Ja.I. c.28". I was trying to get more information about the citation so I could enlarge it for the article so that people can actually look it up. If you could help me embellish it by explaining where the citation is from so that it had future threads of pursuit, it would be greatly appreciated... Thank you. Regards. Steve. Stevenmitchell (talk) 13:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

• Richard, thank you. I was looking at the article actually for information on the historical person and wanted to pursue more data, so that is why I asked. I will post this on your page also. I appreciate your help. Regards. Steve.Stevenmitchell (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

AFT5 re-enabled

Hey Richard75 :). Just a note that the Article Feedback Tool, Version 5 has now been re-enabled. Let us know on the talkpage if you spot any bugs. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 01:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Though we may disagree on the interpretation, I cannot help but be impressed with your diligence and stick-to-itiveness with the Treason Act of 1397 page, as well as the other, related pages on which you have worked. Mrlimmer2 (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Capital punishment in the United Kingdom

I have opened up a discussion concerning your revert of my edits at Talk:Capital_punishment_in_the_United_Kingdom#Incorrect_legal_analysis_as_violation_of_WP:PRIMARY. Int21h (talk) 14:38, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mitchel Scanlon

The article Mitchel Scanlon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ...William 23:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

It has got sources. Please look at the article under the section heading sources. Richard75 (talk) 19:30, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Countess of Warwick

Lady Anne de Beauchamp was Countess in her own right (the Earldom being held by the Beauchamp family). It's confusing to have her as Anne Neville. She is known in history and genealogy as Anne de Beauchamp, not Neville. -- Lady Meg (talk) 01:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Judge Anderson book

Template:Infobox Judge Anderson book has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Augusta

Thanks for correcting my error, neglecting Augusta.[1]. --Qexigator (talk) 17:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Lords Precedence Act 1539, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lord High Admiral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)