User talk:Rslick99
April 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Grace Benham because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Twilight (CD-ROM). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Twilight (CD-ROM) was changed by Rslick99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966999 on 2014-04-10T20:31:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:31, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Twilight (CD-ROM) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 20:31, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Twilight (CD-ROM). --k6ka (talk | contribs) 20:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.