User talk:Ryanwong101

August 2016

Hello, I'm Jauerback. An edit that you recently made to Pokok Assam seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 16:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Fenix down (talk) 14:15, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I may have been a bit rash with the block earlier. I have unblocked you but please be more careful when editing. Fenix down (talk) 21:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sam Bone

The article Sam Bone has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kostas20142 (talk) 17:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sam Bone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Bone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Bone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 11:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Reading F.C.. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Liam Moore. Misuse of reference. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:38, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Molly Kingsbury

The article Molly Kingsbury has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Madg2011 (talk) 16:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Molly Kingsbury

The article Molly Kingsbury has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable athlete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:21, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Molly Kingsbury for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Molly Kingsbury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Kingsbury until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Wan Kuzain. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:05, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thierry Nevers

The article Thierry Nevers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable footballer. Routine coverage, no first team appearances.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Egghead06 (talk) 07:16, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thierry Nevers

Hello, Ryanwong101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thierry Nevers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]