User talk:ScotScotOcelot

11/9/23

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. GraziePrego (talk) 04:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even though a lot of the international support stuff was plausible ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do I make the support stuff better, I know it looks unprofessional how its done ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

“Plausible?” It needs to be *accurate*. GraziePrego (talk) 04:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then what do you think was not accurate ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please give an example ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Give me an example of what was not accurate ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to have a source to confirm that it is accurate. That's not negotiable. GraziePrego (talk) 04:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will try to find sources ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where is user from ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just Asking ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

?????? GraziePrego (talk) 04:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just was asking ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:45, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to sound blunt and rood, but your interests are Biology and Science and not international relations so why should you care about what people who have interests in international relations & geopolitics put on pages ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I care about all parts of the encyclopedia. I revert vandalism/bad edits all across the encyclopedia, from biology to Eminem. I can care when content is added with no source to any part of Wikipedia, not just biology pages. GraziePrego (talk) 04:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that wikipedia just doesn't like the truth being put out there about certain things, thats why they won't even allow people to edit things regarding Ukraine, Eastern Europe and Middle East ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The whole point of Wikipedia is that anyone can edit. Anyone can edit pages about "Ukraine, Eastern Europe and Middle East", they just can't add content they just made up in their own heads with no source.

Edit anything you like. Just make sure there's a source for what you're saying. That's a fundamental rule that keeps Wikipedia a factual place. GraziePrego (talk) 04:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also that is pretty blunt and rude. People can care about many things. GraziePrego (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Um for the second congo war, I did want to properly edit the foreign support section, but can you explain to me how to properly edit it ScotScotOcelot (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First maybe I should find sources for you to back it up ScotScotOcelot (talk) 02:49, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2006 Thai coup d'état, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 04:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the Bolivian Gas Conflicts page, they dont offer any sources ScotScotOcelot (talk) 04:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not an excuse for you to not offer any though. Content must be sourced. GraziePrego (talk) 04:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Euromaidan. Materialscientist (talk) 03:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 20:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at January 6 United States Capitol attack. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 02:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]