User talk:Seadevil5

February 2021

Hello, I'm Asartea. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 11:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Madan Mitra have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Madan Mitra was changed by Seadevil5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929456 on 2021-03-15T12:59:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Madan Mitra. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to ABP Ananda have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: ABP Ananda was changed by Seadevil5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872018 on 2021-04-13T05:05:02+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mamata Banerjee. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Refrain from introducing factual errors and possible future events per WP:CRYSTAL. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mamata Banerjee, you may be blocked from editing. Stop disruptive editing. Banerjee didn't resign from her post. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:53, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Republic TV. — Newslinger talk 07:43, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 07:44, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Firhad Hakim have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Firhad Hakim was changed by Seadevil5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950632 on 2021-04-20T14:41:16+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at NDTV India, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:39, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

madarchod Seadevil5 (talk) 06:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]