User talk:Seasider53/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Seasider53. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
123 East Charlton Street (Marist School site)
So 123 East Charlton Street was the site of the Marist School, but there is nothing remotely historical about that building. I see it every day; the building is 1972. The plaque honors the legacy of the site, but there's nothing still standing there.JeffersonLH (talk) 23:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
@JeffersonLH: Yes, there have been a few in there from my gullible days. Seasider53 (talk) 12:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Louisa Porter, 23 East Charlton
Gotta ask how strongly do you feel about this particular entry...? I do think some leeway with widely-recognizable demolished properties is cool, but this one was torn down in the 1930s; today's 23 East Charlton is not this structure, and even I had to dust off my copy of Luciana's Lost Savannah to remind myself what it was or looked like. :) JeffersonLH (talk) 03:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- @JeffersonLH: Would probably make sense to add a separate table below the current one for those structures no longer with us that were sufficiently notable. I'm reading (and as you'll know) that lot was formerly home to "a free school, a health center, and an orphanage", according to the current building's SCAD page. If there's a photo around, that would be nice as well. Seasider53 (talk) 10:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- My fear is that adding such a table could prove an overwhelming task, and would legit stretch into the hundreds (yup... genuinely wouldn't know where to start or stop; we lost a LOT), and with so many construction/demolition dates unclear, it's a challenge. Plus, finding available imagery for most of these would be more daunting than me walking around with my phone. (While on the subject, I do think your addition of the Wetter House was a good one, by the way.) JeffersonLH (talk) 10:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- @JeffersonLH: Fair enough. If it was on a more manageable scale, such as the Jobbers Canyon Historic District in Omaha, I could have rattled it off in a day. Seasider53 (talk) 10:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
English Football League discussion
Hi Seasider - as you contributed to EFL League Two, you may like to participate in the current discussion on Talk:EFL Championship, "English Football League – article arrangement and article improvements".
Thanks,
Demokra (talk) 04:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted material
Your edit to Holy Trinity Church, Dunoon has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Drchriswilliams (talk) 07:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Thomas Jackson Charlton (physician, born 1895) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Jackson Charlton (physician, born 1895) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Fram (talk) 07:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Thomas Jackson Charlton (physician, born 1863) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://ghs.galileo.usg.edu/ghs/view?docId=ead/MS%200132-ead.xml and Very close paraphrasing. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 08:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Thomas Jackson Charlton (physician, born 1833) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Jackson Charlton (physician, born 1833) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Fram (talk) 08:39, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Thomas Jackson Charlton (physician, born 1805) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability, one sentence in the description of papers, and a passing mention in a bio of his father.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Thomas Jackson Charlton (physician, born 1805) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Jackson Charlton (physician, born 1805) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Fram (talk) 07:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks to written the only good thing in the dispute with Giulio Lopez. Sorry but i'll leave my account. No problems with others editors 'till Giulio Lopez who has a problem with me! Igts2ane (talk) 08:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| Great job creating St John the Baptist Roman Catholic Church, Perth! It's a lovely article. Cardofk (talk) 14:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC) |
Just asking, but why didn't you do an article about the neighboring c. 1678 dated house? [1] - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Didn't feel like it. Seasider53 (talk) 14:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I am just composing a huge article of first period houses (1660 to 1699) is all. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Are you going to create all the articles? Seasider53 (talk) 14:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- No, just a list of houses with and without articles for Massachusetts only. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Are you going to create all the articles? Seasider53 (talk) 14:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I am just composing a huge article of first period houses (1660 to 1699) is all. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Category:North Yarmouth Academy has been nominated for deletion
Category:North Yarmouth Academy has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 14:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Height
Hi,
Jordan Thorniley’s height is incorrect. He is 6’2. The Google stat is incorrect. Mattwhitfield96 (talk) 17:10, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattwhitfield96: you'll need a new, reliable source stating as much. Hearsay won't suffice. Seasider53 (talk) 18:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Okay I’ll get a picture of him next to a measure and send it to you. What source would you like? I’ll get him to send me the stats now Mattwhitfield96 (talk) 18:14, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Uh, that's not how any of this works. Seasider53 (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattwhitfield96: See Wikipedia:Verifiability for how sourcing works at Wikipedia. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Alright don’t get sassy just think you’re being nasty turning down facts Mattwhitfield96 (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Coastliner
Hi Seasider53, according to MOS:DABPRIMARY, if there is no primary topic, then the disambiguation page title should have the base name (Coastliner in this case), and the title with '(disambiguation)' should be the redirect. I've switched around Coastliner and Coastliner (disambiguation) so that they are no long malplaced. Leschnei (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Edits to Sydney Page
Hello Seasider53,
You undid my change to the Sydney page. I did justify my deletion on the relevant talk page: it's the last contribution. Please have a read. The issue in that deletion isn't the Indigenous name issue per se, but that the cited source flatly contradicts the information. I do go on to have my say on the issue under discussion though. Thanks. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 12:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colonial Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universal City.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Ballpark or Stadium
Hi Seasider,
I'm not the first one to notice that there was a discrepancy in baseball stadium articles. I looked in the history of those few pages where you reverted my changes, and after some digging, found that this discussion went on just last January, opened by editor Nemov. It appears that there was consensus to call MLB venues "Stadiums", as that term is narrower than the more generic "ballpark", which can encompass everything from sandlots to little league fields, etc. Hope this helps. I'm going to change the first lines of those articles back. Fred Zepelin (talk) 12:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bridge Street 1901.png
Thanks for uploading File:Bridge Street 1901.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bridge Street 1901.png
Thanks for uploading File:Bridge Street 1901.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bessie Locke.png
Thank you for uploading File:Bessie Locke.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Pomarium Street.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pomarium Street.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Captain Reuben Prince House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Total lack of notability (or is it known under a different name?).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Harlan Price
Hi there, can you explain the following uncited statement at Harlan Price? "Upon retirement, he became a member of the United States House of Representatives for the State of Maine." I can find no evidence of this. User:Namiba 16:06, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- It's Harlan Prince, and it's cited where necessary. Seasider53 (talk) 19:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, I see someone corrected your error. He was a member of the Maine House of Representatives, not US Congress.--User:Namiba 19:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Captain Reuben Prince House for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Reuben Prince House until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Fram (talk) 10:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Captain James Munroe Bucknam (1740)
Is the Captain a building?Xx236 (talk) 11:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
You trying to drive down real estate values by removing "affluent"? Just kidding. There was a consensus a while back at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Archive 19#Request for comment. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Country houses
Hi, can you add country house articles you create to List of country houses in the United Kingdom? I added Aberdeenshire. It might be a good place to red link articles first. Thanks for your work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Oakbank Primary School
Hello Seasider53. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Oakbank Primary School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Decling this for the minute while I have a look at the history. There was a stub there before, and then was changed to a redirect without discussion as far as I can see. . Thank you. GedUK 14:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Just FYI, I've rolled back the redirect to the article history and raised it at AfD, as schools can't be A7ed. GedUK 11:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Cast metal stop sign.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cast metal stop sign.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Reversion reason
Unsure why you reverted edit on All creatures great and small episode list. Picture and text was as described in reason for change, it was trivia for a plot description and there was no reason to link to a page for the company mentioned. 2A00:23C5:E3A2:B301:FD87:23B3:FF3B:3C47 (talk) 21:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Seasider53. Thank you for creating Henry Myers (navy). User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice job on the article. Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Onel5969 TT me 13:42, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert: BLP
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Sandstein 09:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
About the He-Man page
@Sundropie: I'm really sorry for editing the external links three times since last week. What I did was very wrong. Please forgive me.Sundropie (talk) 20:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Do not warn of edit war when there is no edit war.
Remove your erroneous warning AT ONCE! Join the discussion, and stay off my talk page.Shajure (talk) 23:50, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- 2nd warning: remove your wp:te from the talk page at the article. Shajure (talk) 23:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Category:Theatres in Savannah, Georgia has been nominated for merging
Category:Theatres in Savannah, Georgia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 19:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Category:Apartment buildings in Savannah, Georgia has been nominated for merging
Category:Apartment buildings in Savannah, Georgia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 15:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Shinsei (restaurant)
Hello, Seasider53. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shinsei".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Category:Ice hockey teams in Savannah, Georgia has been nominated for merging
Category:Ice hockey teams in Savannah, Georgia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 13:05, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Cohen House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shearith Israel.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
The article Jacob Mitchell (deacon, born 1696) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article gives zero indication of him being actually prominent or doing anything which has been noted. Being a selectman in a town of a 1000 people or so, that's about it?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Your edit to Main Street (Yarmouth, Maine)
Hello there editor!
In an edit to the aforementioned article, you made an edit without giving a reason for the edit. In the future, please give a reason for an edit before publishing it, as it helps the Wikipedia Community know what changes you have made, and why you made them.
Thanks! -:Lechuga
 | This user is a recent changes patroller. |
Nomination of Rachel Starr (winemaker) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Starr (winemaker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
QuintinK (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Reason for revert?
Source for Good Will Hunting was valid. Why the revert? 109.154.200.100 (talk) 22:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- It isn't pertinent to the character or the movie. Seasider53 (talk) 08:29, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:Libraries in Savannah, Georgia has been nominated for merging
Category:Libraries in Savannah, Georgia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 03:30, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Purey-Cust nursing home.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Purey-Cust nursing home.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Why has my edit been reverted?
Hib-Tone has not worked with any artist since 1985(?) (at least according to the Wikipedia article), so how does it still exist? It should not exist anymore, right? Another article I forgot the name of mentioned it as not existing anymore. So why has my edit been reverted? 83.87.200.140 (talk) 16:55, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- @83.87.200.140: No sources were given. Seasider53 (talk) 09:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Station Hotel Perth logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Station Hotel Perth logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:Companies based in Yarmouth, Maine has been nominated for merging
Category:Companies based in Yarmouth, Maine has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 18:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:Ice hockey in Savannah, Georgia has been nominated for merging
Category:Ice hockey in Savannah, Georgia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 16:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Station Hotel Perth logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Station Hotel Perth logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
UK history
I see the new articles you are contributing when I add my own to the 10,000 Wikipedia Challenge. Your productivity is amazing! I really enjoy reading and writing about the history and historic sites in the UK. I would love to see many of the sites I write about. The last time I was in the UK was in 2016, pre-Covid. Hopefully, next year I will be exploring old churchyards and abbey ruins. MauraWen (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
Your recent editing history at John Smeaton shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 16:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Martin of Sheffield:, might you remove the blurb at the top of the article, since I'm out of reverts. Seasider53 (talk) 16:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- No. I'm not getting drawn into this spat. As an Englishman (the "of Sheffield" ought to be a hint) I would probably disagree with you, but unless there is an RFC I will not be involved. We all have to live together on this small island and outbreaks of English/Scottish/Welsh name calling don't help. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 18:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- It was a talk template that the IP editor had somehow added to the article with their last edit, but never mind. Seasider53 (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- No. I'm not getting drawn into this spat. As an Englishman (the "of Sheffield" ought to be a hint) I would probably disagree with you, but unless there is an RFC I will not be involved. We all have to live together on this small island and outbreaks of English/Scottish/Welsh name calling don't help. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 18:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Glenfinnan Monument
Hi - I've raised a query about the Glenfinnan Monument here. Do you happen to have a source for the dedication to the Loudon's Highlanders? It seems rather counter-intuitive, as they appear to have fought against rather than for the Jacobites. Be grateful for any clarification. KJP1 (talk) 10:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Why are you removing AFC Crewe on Gary Taylor-Fletchers wikipage?
He is the new manager of AFC Crewe (look at both his twitter and the socials of AFC Crewe). If you remove other peoples contributions, at least give a reason. 2A00:801:726:EA48:B069:581D:EE71:958B (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lynemouth Colliery.png
Thanks for uploading File:Lynemouth Colliery.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust logo 2.png
Thanks for uploading File:Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust logo 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
