User talk:Sharolaidbartle

Welcome!

Hello, Sharolaidbartle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Balsky's, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Balsky's

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Balsky's, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced slang term, no assertion of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yolanda Stedman

A tag has been placed on Yolanda Stedman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Acroterion _(talk) 01:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Balsky's

I have nominated Balsky's, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balsky's. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 01:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Michael Johnson (footballer born 1988), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 08:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Balsky's

A tag has been placed on Balsky's, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Flop (association football). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:32, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Fischer iceland.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fischer iceland.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Fischer iceland.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fischer iceland.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at chess, you will be blocked from editing. Bubba73 ^{(Who's attacking me now?)}, 04:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Judit Polgár, you will be blocked from editing. Bubba73 ^{(Who's attacking me now?)}, 04:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Barret (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Inappropriate editing

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Ian Cairns (talk) 20:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Les Ferdinand; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tmol42 (talk) 00:50, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Robinho, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 20:50, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Manchester City F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ 07:11, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You've been blocked for vandalism again. I see you occasionally make legit edits too, but if someone has to check each of your edits to see if they're good or bad, it isn't worth our time to have you here. I hope you'll contribute positively from here on out, once your block expires. If not, you'll be blocked indefinitely if you vandalize once more. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:30, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, on further review of your deleted contributions and the long history of warnings, I've reblocked you indefinitely. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]