User talk:Signshare

Welcome!

Hello Signshare! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting "adopted" by an experienced user How to: edit a page • upload and use images • start an article

Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention

Policies and guidelines

Neutral point of view • No original research
Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule
Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

User community

Build consensus • Resolve disputes
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • No legal threats

Community Portal • Village pump
Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists

Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review

Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Netsnipe ► 07:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Game (rapper)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from The Game (rapper). Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Spellcast 00:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article J-Hood (rapper) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MastCell ^Talk 21:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of J-Hood (rapper)

A tag has been placed on J-Hood (rapper), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Ridernyc 01:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User:Ridernyc, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Chris G 10:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Mims discography. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Spellcast 18:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Hi Signshare, in response to this comment, yeah I like Game's stuff too. His second CD is better than his first. Also, remember to post your messages on the person's talk page, not user page. And sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). If you need any help or whatever, feel free to leave a message. Thanks. Spellcast 00:44, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NCH

Since you opted to position your unsigned post right in the middle of another editor's comment, I have had to revert it. If you wish to use a talk page or help page, please follow posting instructions and talk page guidelines. The aggressive tone and incoherent style suggested that you posted in a knee-jerk reaction to something, which is never productive. Please stayl calm and observe Wikipedia:Etiquette. The very fact that you were able to edit any page other this talk page demonstrates that you are not currently blocked and had a block taken place, it would have included a notification here. Adrian M. H. 21:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of One Twelve Music Group

A tag has been placed on One Twelve Music Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Pig^man 05:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ridernyc, you will be blocked from editing. Ridernyc 05:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Without You (Mims song)

Without You (Mims song), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Without You (Mims song) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Without You (Mims song) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Without You (Mims song) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ridernyc 06:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Without You (Mims song)

Without You (Mims song), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Without You (Mims song) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Without You (Mims song) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Without You (Mims song) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ridernyc 06:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of It's Alright (MIMS song)

It's Alright (MIMS song), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that It's Alright (MIMS song) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Alright (MIMS song) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of It's Alright (MIMS song) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ridernyc 06:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mims discography

Mims discography, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Mims discography satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mims discography and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Mims discography during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ridernyc 06:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advice On Creating New Articles

Please read WP:MUSIC before creating anymore articles. I love the fact that you are contributing to wikipedia but you need to understand policy before creating articles. I have nothing against you or hiphop. In fact I have no clue who you are, your page is one of deozens that I nominated for deletion in one evening. Please do not edit my user page again, comment should be left on my talk page. Ridernyc 07:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User:Ridernyc. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

You're getting very close to being blocked. If you want to talk to someone, do it on their User_talk: page and not their User: page (or else it will be treated as vandalism) and you need to sign your posts. Also, Ridernyc is right, you're not allowed to use Wikipedia to promote yourself or music. It's a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and all articles concerning artists must comply with Wikipedia:Notability (music). You're not notable just because you say you are, you're only notable when the media say you are. -- Netsnipe ► 07:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Inc. Records artists

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article The Inc. Records artists, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. NeilN 02:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your talk page posts

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- Netsnipe ► 02:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Music Is My Savior remix album

A tag has been placed on Music Is My Savior remix album, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Hiberniantears 23:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Music Is My Savior remix album

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Music Is My Savior remix album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. tomasz. 16:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Mims' second studio album

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mims' second studio album, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mims' second studio album was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mims' second studio album, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 12:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Autobiography (album)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:whpq. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

I removed only the information that was indicated as "rumoured". As per wikipedia policy on verifiability, information needs to be backed up with reliable sources. You claim that there were references and sources, but I deleted them. That is not the case. The version of the article I editted had no references. I've dug through the hostory and found this improperly formatted url which I beleive should be written as http://music.aol.com/popeater/2007/09/14/mims-plays-with-the-big-boys-readies-new-album/ In any case, its an AOL music blog that doesn't support the rumored material. -- Whpq 20:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you thought that then why didn't you write it as so instead of deleting my work, improve Wikipedia, but don't worry. There is a new encyclopedia site coming out soon and I am joining on over there and I am also launching my own and not to be mean don't ever log on to my site, like you'd even want to after how we've treated each other. But while I'm here I guess we have to agree to disagree, look I'm not saying that we have to stop arguing, but I won't vandalize or delete any of your work and I will not curse at you, but I want you to promise that you will not delete my work again, but I'd think it would be fun for us to argue a bit, some doctors say that it is healthy for people to argue and let their feelings out.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. It would be inappropriate to promise not to delete each others work if that is the appropriate action to improve wikipedia. -- Whpq 13:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you had really read what I had said I said that I won't delete your work as long as you don't delete mine and allow me to clarify what I said I said that we can from here on out keep our dispute on our talk pages respectively and that I won't curse at you or threaten you anymore. Signshare, November 1, 2007

As stated in the edit pages and WP:OWN, If you don't want your material to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it., so it is quite simply inappropriate to promise not to delete each others work. If my contributions aren't appropriate to an article, I fully expect others (you included) to delete those contributions. If there is controversy over the material, it should be discussed on the article's talk page. That is all there is to it. Regards. -- Whpq 12:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But I didn't say I owned the page all I said was add not delete. You said edit not delete as you did to me. What I said is that the only form of retaliation that you will recieve from me will be on this page. I think that you might be trying to get me blocked for another week, but I won't let you I'll let my intelluctuality take over and you won't be able to handle my mind level. Signhare, November 1, 2007

Blocked

I have blocked you for one week. Edits such as this, this, and this are not productive at all. Perhaps consider taking the time to read WP:CIVIL. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for blatant incivility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

AfD nomination of The Autobiography (album)

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Autobiography (album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Autobiography (album). Thank you. Whpq 13:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fat Joe

Thank you for complimenting me on the improvements I made to the Fat Joe article. Anyway, here are my main concerns I had for that article, as well as most other hip-hop related articles.

A lot of the criticisms/controversies listed on the article were poorly sourced, unbalanced, or downright borderline libelous - violating Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, neutral point of view, and biographies of living persons.
The article would've needed cleaning up for quality, but it wasn't tagged, so I just went ahead and cleaned it up with the power of free editing. Basically, there were some bad spelling/grammar and gratuitously repetitive information too.

Now, I tagged "needs more sources" under the "Conflicts" section because I was unable to find any reliable sources for beef with Jay-Z, but I think there can be some for the G-Unit/Terror Squad issues. If neither of us can find reliable sources for Fat Joe having beef with Jay-Z, then we should remove it immediately per biographies of living persons policy. Remember: "Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous." --Andrewlp1991 22:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mims (rapper)

I'm seriously tired of editing your info on the page. I always see false info about his new album and such. Seriously, I've seen your edits on the page and it changes. I'm really tired of telling you that you should add the sources if an album is gonna be released. I'm getting mostly tired of people putting up false info about hip hop artists and you're becoming one of them. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 01:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Mims (rapper), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 01:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, that info is unsourced. Source that info so it can be notable. I will continue deleting it until sources are provided. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 23:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE

Well, it has a warning tag of putting false info on the page. I don't think that should be deleted. Anyway, you can delete this if you want but I also put that other message in there to say something about your edits on the page. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, which are the tracks. I know some songs that feature him but appear on other albums. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 23:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend to put up sources. Seriously, I keep deleting unsourced claims on many places and the MIMS page is one of them. Add a reliable source if you put up information like a new album. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 23:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fan? Honestly, I just prevent vandalism on the page. I don't like much of his work... --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 23:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of J-Hood (rapper)

A tag has been placed on J-Hood (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for expanding the article. To avoid new articles being tagged for speedy deletion, you may want to create them first in a user sub-page or use the {{underconstruction}} template. As it was, the initial version did not assert notability. Jfire (talk) 16:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mims' second studio album

They were not references. Also, please see which references ae admissinble in wikipedia. `'Míkka >t 21:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mims' second studio album

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mims' second studio album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mims' second studio album. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 21:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop adding information to wikipedia without valid references. Please read Wikipedia:Attribution caregully and follow the rules. `'Míkka >t 21:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not following you. Since last week I am watching a hundred or so various rap/hip hop articles and mercilessly deleting all contributions taht don't have references. This is how wikipedia works. Without references to valid sources there is no way to distinguish correct information from bullshit and rumors. `'Míkka >t 02:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me what exactly you don't usderstand in wikipedia policies WP:ATTRIBUTION, WP:CITE and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. In a nuthell, all text which is not publisher in reputable sources will be deleted from wikipedia articles. Blogs, message boards and personal webpage are not reputable sources for wikipedia articles. `'Míkka >t 07:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You don't see it...

...do you? I only removed the tag once and another user rm the tag again. Also, the {{hangon}} is for only contesting speedy deletions. And yes, if it's unsoruced information, then I must have to remove it. And you better leave it like that unless you put sources --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 01:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And you don't either. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 23:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Signshare

Hi Signshare. I don't remember talking with you a few months ago but thanks for the notice. And yeah, Family Guy's cool, but I don't usually edit though. Spellcast (talk) 03:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah I see now. It's the one where you said I really like Dr. Dre's artists and how Game's 2nd cd was hot. Spellcast (talk) 03:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Recent Comment on User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me

This is uncalled for. Please review WP:OWN and WP:CIVIL. Editors are free to make whatever constructive edits they wish. If you disagree with the edit please use the article's talk page. Thank you. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 04:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat, please review WP:CIVIL. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 16:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, can you please remove your "battle list" on your user page? It violates WP:ATTACK. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 16:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle list

Hi Signshare - in response to concerns from other editors, I've removed the section of your user page that details other members of the community that you have "battled". Such material is not conducive to either smooth community functioning or the building of an encyclopedia, and it also included a number of personal attacks. Please do not re-insert it, and please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page if you want to discuss this further. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 17:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe - indeed, I am quite certain - that I quote from WP:USER when I say "pages in user space still do belong to the community" and "community policies, including Wikipedia:No personal attacks, apply to your user space just as they do elsewhere." There is also a discussion about this at WP:ANI##User:Signshare_personal_.22battle_list.22, which you might want to check out. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for not revert-warring over this. If I can ever be of any assistance, please let me know. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 18:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why does this continue?

Why didn't you source it in the first place? That would avoid a lot of hassle for you if you just put up the sources. Also, why was I in your "battle list"? Like a beef or something? The only problem I have with you is putting up possible-false information. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 22:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, we just had an argument. You didn't win because I didn't back down on your decision (someone else made the decision). So, no winners. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 23:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. nat.utoronto 22:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually...

Just the title.... you never confirmed it and also, I was the one who sourced the making of the album. I knew he was making a second album (sourced it, again) but you made up so many names! Seriously, what are trying to say? --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 23:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would but only if you give me even more sources about it. One just won't cut it. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 23:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of New York hip hop

A tag has been placed on New York hip hop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Mims

A tag has been placed on Template:Mims requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to List of Capitol Records artists

Not sure why you removed all those artists from the list, since you didn't use the edit summary. I've reverted your edits. Precious Roy (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mims' second studio album

An editor has nominated Mims' second studio album, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mims' second studio album and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Mims' second studio album

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mims' second studio album. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 01:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, it was best the way it was. Why change it? It was previously debated. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 01:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, that's why this page exists: Mims (disambiguation). So, it means it can go in many ways. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 01:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, other articles can mean that. Keep it up and I would have to block you from making any more edits. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I don't know how exactly that happen to be but propose the change, just don't change it all he sudden. (PS: I saw the edit of removing the AfD page from the album article). --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:05, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Good for you too from disrupting edits. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because I'm watching those pages... is that a problem? --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And how should I worry? --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can you get a restraining order? I'm not even physically close to you. But oh well. Does it look I should care? --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it to me that no one likes me. Prove it to me that I have no life. If you do, then we could talk. In the meantime... --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Call it whatever you want. I'm just following the rules. The page is nominated to be deleted and it cannot be altered to anything else unless an agreement comes across on the debate. If yount to redirect it, just say it on the debate. That's simple as that. Anyway, you received your last warning. So, I'm not gonna argue because they're is no point. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Esanchez7587. Thank you. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Esanchez7587. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Keep it up with the edits. I haven't said anything to you but you just keep coming back. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 02:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to User talk:Esanchez7587 could give editors of Wikipedia the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use dispute resolution. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 02:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help

The sources for the album were forums, which aren't reliable sources. See also WP:CBALL. Mims will likely release another album though, so it can be recreated with better references. Spellcast (talk) 06:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Second album

It's just announced but that's it. When more "reliable" sources mention it, then it can be put out. ("Ordinary people get killed", esta loco!) --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 22:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Esanchez7587, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 15:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have nothing better to say but just to unsult me. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 15:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feelings

You wish. But I have no idea what are you trying to do. You're just trying to insult me. Keep it up and I'm gonna block you. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 15:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Do not redirect vanished users' talk pages to your own. Thank you. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I figured that was the case for the I.P.s; I have no problem with that. I was talking about your redirect of User talk:W.marsh. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 21:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of why you did it, please don't do anything like it again. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 21:12, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hustla

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hustla, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Hustla. Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 22:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your question on my user talk page. Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 01:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hustla

I have nominated Hustla, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hustla. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 20:37, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 2 Pistols

A tag has been placed on 2 Pistols requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Redfarmer (talk) 22:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You...

For welcoming me into the world of Wikipedia. --Soldidozen (talk) 14:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soliddozen

Hey, nice parody of that other guy! --Soldidozen (talk) 18:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manyevent

Dang, you've had it tough in Wikipedia, haven't you. Look, I have huge plans in Wikipedia and if you try to calm down just a bit, you can become a lead wikipedian, like I plan to be. And from what I've seen you have few to no friends, so I will befriend you.--Manyevent (talk) 00:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its just...

me again, thanks for the heads up, you know you are not as bad as you seem. I have a hard time beleiving you said those things, but here they lie. I do beleive that if you just apologize and try to do better that you will become an administrator, just like I will.--Manyevent (talk) 00:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New York hip hop

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article New York hip hop, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Autobiography

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article The Autobiography, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another warning

Signshare you have been warned many times not to add false material and material that cannot be verified to articles about other people. Will you please stop and liscen once and for all? Thanks!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by JBsupreme (talk • contribs) 19:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning regarding WP:BLP articles

Hello Signshare. I am concerned about your long standing history of adding content to WP:BLP articles that are not properly sourced, and in many cases appear to be incorrect. It is difficult to assume good faith when you have been doing this in such a subtle matter for so long. I am concerned that if you do not stop this behavior your account may be blocked for disruptive editing practices. I think you've been fairly warned. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 22:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. Specifically, you copied the contents of Detroit Panthers (ABA) and pasted it into Detroit Zafir. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming an article is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Cash Money Records artists

I have nominated List of Cash Money Records artists, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cash Money Records artists. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Damiens.rf 21:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You Ain't

Notorious or Infamous, you a playboy gangsta. I'm a do what you did only bigger and better. I'm what you used to be and I been to both of your lame Tevapedias. If we fought, I'd kill ya, boy.

--Voiceaxis (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^Ignore that shit. I have a feeling he's a sockpuppet of a certain user I'm having trouble with. I just blocked the account though so the user doesn't use it again. Any more issues let me know and I can look through it. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 00:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't just my work you redid

And it's not because what I wrote was changed. It's because your clean up was opinion laced and inaccurate and I don't find any of your restructuring necessary.LightningMan (talk) 13:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Presidential Beats"

A page you created, Presidential Beats, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. BigHairRef | Talk 01:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Meet the Browns (TV sreies)

I have nominated Meet the Browns (TV sreies), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meet the Browns (TV sreies). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Editor437 (talk) 05:26, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Rebirth

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Rebirth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 16:14, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Hood Is Back

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Hood Is Back, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 16:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of On Da Grind

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article On Da Grind, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 13:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mims' third studio album

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mims' third studio album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 14:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of You Win Some, You Lose Some

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article You Win Some, You Lose Some, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 00:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Just Like That (Mims song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Just Like That (Mims song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable single. Fails WP:MUSIC#SONGS.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 16:05, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Signshare! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 42 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Armel (singer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of United States Basketball Association

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is United States Basketball Association. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Basketball Association. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of American King Music

A tag has been placed on American King Music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 10:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of American King Music

I have nominated American King Music, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American King Music. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 08:26, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Armel (singer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armel (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armel (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 23:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Infatuated

The article Infatuated has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of More Than Meets the Eye (mixtape)

The article More Than Meets the Eye (mixtape) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage found in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gongshow ^Talk 03:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of G-Unit–Murder Inc. feud for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article G-Unit–Murder Inc. feud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Unit–Murder Inc. feud until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest355 Talk 02:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of What You Think of That

The article What You Think of That has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 13:17, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]