User talk:Slane00

Welcome!

Hello, Slane00, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! ~ R.T.G 11:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

House of Plantagenet

Hello, I see you have been editing that page to remove reference to the word feudalism as you believe it is professionally considered defunct. But such type of claims have to be supported by publications. So I am going to revert the edit. But I assume that your intentions are good, so that's why I will leave you this message about it. ~ R.T.G 11:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Peter Duane Deaver

Hey @Slane00, why did you move Draft:Peter Duane Deaver out of the draftspace into a user namespace? Is there something specific you were trying to accomplish there, anything I can assist with? microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 22:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks! No, I was working on my first article and just wasn't familiar with Wikipedia conventions. I think I worked it out. Slane00 (talk) 18:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. I had a productive conversation with the G10 nominator and am working to improve sourcing in the article. Slane00 (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Duane Deaver (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission has been declined for one or more of the following reasons:

It is primarily designed to threaten, disparage or attack its subject.
It is a biography of a living person that is unreferenced and entirely negative in tone.
It is a page that is purely vandalistic in nature.

This page meets one or more of the general criteria for speedy deletion and may be deleted without notice. Users who continue to create inappropriate pages will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is problematic. Approx ⅓ of the paragraphs are entirely unreferenced, and some have content after the last citation (meaning that the para end is not clearly supported). There are allegations and insinuations which may or may not be supported by the sources, and at least some of what appears to be original research or synthesis. Given all that, and considering the strongly negative nature of this, and the fact that the subject is a living person (and arguably a relatively low-profile one at that), I feel this is borderline attack page, and also possibly violates WP:BLP1E and/or WP:SUSPECT. As such, I am declining this draft and will request speedy deletion so that an administrator can take a view of whether this should be deleted as a whole, or suppressed in part, or for that matter allowed to be published.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Duane Deaver and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slane00! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Duane Deaver (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

bordering on an attack page when none of the sources seem to be nearly as negative

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Duane Deaver and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Orlando F. Hudson, Jr.

Hello, Slane00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Orlando F. Hudson, Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Duane Deaver

Hello, Slane00. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Peter Duane Deaver".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]