User talk:Slatersteven/Archives/2017/December
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Slatersteven. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
personal attacks
Please read this page to brush up on precisely what they are. Thank you. Tidewater 2014 (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Women in Red 2017
Hi! I'm currently translating stubs from Spanish for the Women in Red 2017 World Contest before starting to translate longer articles and expanding the stubs. While I was thinking about looking for help from other participants interested in Latin America, I would be grateful if you are interested in giving a hand. Many thanks in advance! --Jamez42 (talk) 16:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- I was stupid enough to make the offer, what would you like me to do?Slatersteven (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
What's that saying?
Never mud wrestle with a pig(s), as you will only get filthy and the pig(s) will like it. Best of luck! C. W. Gilmore (talk) 16:39, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- This is a borderline violation of your ban, I suggest you do not do something like this again.Slatersteven (talk) 16:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- I was referring to myself and our little exchange in that RfC; I would never insult pig(s) in the manner insinuate as they are far too intelligent, the pig(s) that is. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 13:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- You might wish to know that this has been reported to an admin.Slatersteven (talk) 12:12, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Is it customary for this [1] to happen on the AN/I discussions? C. W. Gilmore (talk) 01:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- There is no reason to not remove a comment you think was wrong,. and you really do not to stop commeting on subjects relating to your ban.Slatersteven (talk) 10:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Allowed to report violation, I believe. I leave the rest in your hands. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 11:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- There is no reason to not remove a comment you think was wrong,. and you really do not to stop commeting on subjects relating to your ban.Slatersteven (talk) 10:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
3RR
You are past it going by my count, be more careful Darkness Shines (talk) 11:59, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- No, I have made two reverts.Slatersteven (talk) 12:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Twice yesterday you removed content I added, once today, there's three. Removing the images can also count as one. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:07, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- So that would be three, and no removing the image does not count (read the policy WP:3RR).Slatersteven (talk) 12:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- The policy says"An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert" Removing images would be undoing another editors actions, cheers Darkness Shines (talk) 12:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- The report me, and we can hash it out there.Slatersteven (talk) 12:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not going to report you, it's not like you did it on purpose Darkness Shines (talk) 12:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- I did not do it, as I said read the policy. So if you are not gong to report me I shall just ignore this from this point on.Slatersteven (talk) 12:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not going to report you, it's not like you did it on purpose Darkness Shines (talk) 12:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- The report me, and we can hash it out there.Slatersteven (talk) 12:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- The policy says"An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert" Removing images would be undoing another editors actions, cheers Darkness Shines (talk) 12:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- So that would be three, and no removing the image does not count (read the policy WP:3RR).Slatersteven (talk) 12:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Twice yesterday you removed content I added, once today, there's three. Removing the images can also count as one. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:07, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 18:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Antisemitism in the Labour Party
Your on 3RR Darkness Shines (talk) 19:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Slatersteven. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Since the redirect keeps being reverted, I've sent it to AfD. Sigh. What a pointless waste of effort.TheLongTone (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Why
Why do you want to delete an article even though it's obviously about a broader thing than the other one?★Trekker (talk) 11:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- Is it, how? it seems to be that (even before I made some alterations to it) it covered the same material. What material is not coverd in the other article?Slatersteven (talk) 11:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Arbcom-l
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee#Contacting the Committee --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
- Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
Outreach and Invitations:
- If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with:
{{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.
New Year New Page Review Drive
- A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
- Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.
General project update:
- ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
- The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Good Time
I have made some improvements to Real Good Time. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Slatersteven reported by User:Darkness Shines (Result: ). Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
ANI-Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. P.S. not mine Kleuske (talk) 14:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Alternative for Germany
Where was he there first? I searched the whole history of talk twice, and of the article as well. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- MY mistake, I just looked at the Antisemitism talk page edits. I will amended my comment on his talk page.Slatersteven (talk) 15:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
User group for Military Historians
Greetings,
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
|
Happy Holidays |
| Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 00:30, 22 December 2017 (UTC) |