Jump to content

User talk:Slazenger/Archives/2014/February

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
good job! Cheesedude23 (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Barry Houston

Hi Slazenger,

I made the edit to the title of this page as the BLP is about Todd Passmore, not Barry Houston therefore the title is misleading. Cheers B — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.120.16.132 (talk) 23:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

  •  Done - I'd suggest you register an account, due to your IP and IP range being used frequently for vandalism. Your edit got caught in the middle of a revert of around 20 edits to go back to the original, un-vandalized article. I have struck your warning, but I very strongly suggest you make an account to avoid issues in the future. Thanks and happy editing. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 23:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Reviewer userright granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Why does this primary source keep getting deleted?

Full recordings of the September 23 and September 30 meetings are available online http://www.burnaby.ca/Our-City-Hall/Mayor---council/council-Meetings.html

(From the Derek Corrigan page) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karen Middlefield (talk • contribs) 18:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Re the Corrigan page. I did include articles from newspapers, including a letter to the editor from a mathematician who was at the meeting and who questioned the fact that the mayor and council did specious studies. I also included a link to the city's own statistics. It seems to me that there is a reluctance to actually have accurate information on this page. It's not supposed to be a mayor's PR page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karen Middlefield (talk • contribs) 18:38, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Karen - I have reverted the article to its state before I became involved. Please take the article, add in direct quotes from your supporting references, and add inline citations from these references to support sentences and paragraphs. I'll keep an eye on the article. Try to do all of these edits at once and be sure to include an edit summary to keep other vandal-patrollers from mistakenly reverting it. Let me know when you've completed this and we'll try to make sure the section can remain in the article. Regards, --Slazenger (Contact Me) 18:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi folks, I've removed Karen's content and primary source, again. This issue has already been discussed at BLPN [1] and her content violates WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE. Please come to the talk page for further discussion. Thank you.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Friend !

Hi , Dear Friend Slazenger when I was going through the aimp found preview release . I felt preview release happened long before and thought of removing it. Because its currently in stable release than preview stated . current update also not updated. Think might be not updatable in wikipedia .

I dont know if it hurt your matter .Pardon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.116.247 (talk) 18:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


Little Mix

hi, I removed those section other charted song because there were no sources. I said that as reason in the edit summary, just check the view history before accusing me of something — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.238.200 (talk) 18:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

IP at Little Mix discography

I noticed you also reverted the removal of content. However, despite addressing it on the talk page, the IP continues to remove the section. I don't want to risk violating WP:3RR, so would you mind having a look at it and if you also view it as vandalism, could you undo the IPs edits. Thank, Oddbodz - (Talk) (Contribs) 18:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.

This is about Subrata2011, as he seems to have ignored the above attempt to mediate and has since resumed editing the Tutorvista page. Jns4eva (talk) 04:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

British balloon and airship club

Hello i'm new here you can possibly tell :O could you delete the page British balloon and airship club on my behalf?

Bradleylewisoxford (talk) 01:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Bogatyr and tsarevna!

You do not respect Russian culture! You spit in it! I'm trying to fix someone else's mistakes, wipe someone else's shit. I do not blame you, the Anglo-Saxons, perverted alien culture, changing the title to more meaningful to you! Saxon geek! Damn you! Fascists!

  • The article on the play is written from the Anglicized version of it, rather than the historical Russian perspective. As such, titles and the information in the article comes from that perspective. There is an article about the Russian version on the Russian Wikipedia, however. So I apologize if you feel that we are doing this in error,but it is done due to regional differences. Regards, --Slazenger (Contact Me) 03:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi

I'm not happy that you changed my William article. You must change it back because it was a big mistake of you.

Thank you, Selena Gomaz's agent — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.190.212 (talk) 17:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


I'm Sorry- cheese dude 23- my brother stole my account and he is very bad.

Victor Williams under Fairfield, AL.

The "1996 Olympic Torch Bearer" and "2007 Outstanding Georgia Citizen" titles are facts. Why did you delete them? What is the problem with adding them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrvictorwilliams (talk • contribs) 00:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

  • No sources were given to corroborate these claims/titles. If you can provide legitimate sources that make mention of Victor's inclusion, please edit the article again and include the reference. Thanks and happy editing! --Slazenger (Contact Me) 00:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
I forgive you. David Bergman (talk) 11:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

This is a school

I see when I browse Wikipedia it often shows that people are making poor edits, and as this is a high school, perhaps its editing privileges should be revoked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.200.173.94 (talk • contribs) 13:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

To be honest, I see this edit in bad faith. Optakeover(Talk) 14:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Appreciate the eagle eye Optakeover, I just always try to AGF. To address this IP, it often happens that places with shared IPs (schools, cafes, etc) receive warnings/blocks due to the edits made by others. Best solution for this is to make an account - it will allow you to edit regardless of what others may be doing on your network. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 14:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

LiamTreharne

Apologies for the innaproprite editing of the Burton Borough Page. It was my friend that edited it in the first place so as a joke i changed his information. It will not happen again. -Liam — Preceding unsigned comment added by LiamTreharne (talk) 10:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Danny Webb

Danny "The Dancer" Webb is a well know figure in the Basingstoke community having amassed more than 600 views on YouTube with his unique style of impromptu dancing. I'm sorry if it caused any offence or didn't seem legitimate, maybe I should have put him in the entertainment section? Good day Slazenger. Good day. Danny xx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannywebb69 (talk • contribs) 13:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Danny, your edits were reverted for a few reasons including the fact that Danny might not be considered as 'notable' as per Wikipedia standards and also due to the fact that no references were given for the claims you made - see WP:NOTE and WP:VERIFY. Additionally, there might be a conflict of interest as well, considering your username. If you have any questions or would like my help, please let me know and I will see what I can do for you! Regards and happy editing! --Slazenger (Contact Me) 13:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

I have to say, on behalf of the community of Basingstoke and Dean, I am shocked and appalled that you have taken down the page that I made for Danny "The Dancer" Webb. He is a local hero and deserves more recognition that a few YouTube videos and a Wikipedia page. You have deeply offended our town and therefore it's second most famous former inhabitant, Tom Cleverley. I hope you will take the necessary steps to correct this profound injustice. Also two people being called Danny is hardly a "conflict of interests"... You tosser, get a real job — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannywebb69 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Why did you think it necessary to change my edit?

Slazenger: I don't even know what you changed back re: my edit; what was it and why? - Benjamin Franklin 75.74.157.29 (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

  • You went through the article and capitalized all letters of 'God' throughout. God is a proper noun and considered a name, and only the first letter should be capitalized. The additional capitals are not needed for emphasis or anything else. Hope that clears it up. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 16:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

I want to retrieve Dar (tribe) which has been tagged with Dhar

The Dar (tribe) is quite distinct from Dhar where it is being redirected, but I do not know how to retrieve the old Dar (tribe) article which has been perhaps vandalised by the person who has put a redirect for Dar (tribe). This vandalism is continuing with all kashmiri muslim tribes under totally unrelated hindu castes without any basis. I think it just brings down the reputation of wikipedia as "encyclopedia" source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imkan125 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Imkan, I understand your frustration with this issue. However, the articles you were editing were merged by user User:Anupam back in 2011. I would suggest going to their talk page and discussing your concerns. I have no familiarity with the topic and thus I am a bad point of contact. If you are unable to reach any consensus with User:Anupam, I would suggest you try WP:DR or WP:RFC to get some outside opinions that can hopefully help you out. Good luck and happy editing! --Slazenger (Contact Me) 23:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Livecams

Hello Slazenger! I'm new here and would like to add some links to wonderful livecams with fantastic views and I really don't want to violate any rights.--Chrissperl (talk) 15:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Chris, I mentioned a consensus that was informally reached in our IRC regarding your addition of the livecams on the editor's talkpage who warned you. I suggest you go there and discuss it with them. I appreciate you trying to help enrich Wikipedia and wish you happy editing in the future! Regards, --Slazenger (Contact Me) 10:17 am, Today (UTC−5)
Hi again, Slazenger! It seems I added to many links to different cities so that the user ohnoitsjamie warned me not to spam Wikipedia; but now it seems like all the links I already set are deleted, away! I worked on that for hours and now everything is deleted! Can't you restore these links please? --Chrissperl (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
No. We don't permit link canvassing, per the links in the warning message above. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:43, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Chris, as I mentioned earlier, this needs to be addressed with them. I cannot act as the gatekeeper in this matter. Since they have been the ones to act on it, they are the ones you need to bring this up with. There are a few WP policies that this could be construed as violating, and I'm sure they'd be happy to discuss them. Please feel free to use my talk page as a place to hash it out. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 16:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Links to live webcams should not be included in the External links section of an article, from my point of view. I'm not sure how does it contribute to make the corresponding article better. WP:EL doesn't particularly says anything related to Live webcams therefore I've left a message there on the talk page seeking other editors view. However, I find WP:ELNEVER closest. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Be very careful of linking to live webcams anywhere in Wikipedia, especially those that are detailed enough to see invididuals in any level of detail. I've put more thoughts at Wikipedia talk:External links#‎Live webcam links. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Dude

Your userpage is really good. Most of you higher level wikipedians have those annoying user badges plastered all over the fkn place. I hate that pretentious shit Fadsaif (talk) 07:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm speechless

ME AND VANDALISM! Dammit, what shit were you smoking man? It was a triple thank you; in Russian to Galina Vishnevskaya; in Spanish to Mr. Roma and in Finnish to Mr. Segerstam. Because I WAS THERE THAT DAY! And you call that 'vandalism'. I'm very astonished. -andy 77.7.111.146 (talk) 10:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Your edits added nothing to the discussion and appear to have no relation to any matter at hand. While talk pages are a forum for discussion, the content should relate to the subject and add something to the discussion. Please let me know if I need to clarify this. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 10:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Oh yes you do! And please fix that F***** BUG!!!! I tried umpteen times to get this goddamn edit and always this crazy error message for minutes! What the hell is up there? Or go on a motherf**kin co-server! But cut this crap out. Request: GET http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slazenger&action=edit§ion=70, from 91.198.174.66 via amssq57 amssq57 ([91.198.174.67]:3128), Varnish XID 927817372 (felt) 19999 times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.7.111.146 (talk) 10:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
I apologize for whatever errors you're receiving, but there's nothing I can do to help you in that regard. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 10:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC

OK, so then let's do it another way. Admins takin' a nap? Probably.---Back on topic: When I write I was there, in person, say a date I am not even allowed to include a thank you TO THE SOLO SOPRANIST? What has Wikipedia come to with this stupid ruling sh**? Thanking the solo sopranist in her native language for this GREAT EVENT!!! And that's called vandalism? You're taking the piss? [edit] No reply? Coming up with your kiddy 'vandalism' shit and then not have the balls to reply? That's what we like, my friend. I'm a fighter. AND THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE REVERTED AGAIN! What a ROORBACK! And on such half-baked level. No one has EVER dared call this 'patent nonsense' before YOU came!!! -andy 77.7.111.146 (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

As described? I can't read anything there. THIS IS AN ADMIN CASE. Best he's gonna chop your kiddy head off with your half-baked argumentation! I've always been unregistered writing as '-andy' but only had a vandalism case ONCE!! SINCE 2003! None more from this time. EVER. You can't tell how proud you are if things have remained like that.---This has nothing, *ABSOLUTELY* nothing to do with *ANY* of the things mentioned in WP:NOT#FORUM and WP:TPG. Don't just say "as described" but also say WHERE. I'm not your search monkey. But it was like I thought: just a rule kiddie's ridiculous monkey-business, nothing more. No balls, but calling this 'patent nonsense'. Summoning admin...this has come far enough.-andy 77.7.111.146 (talk) 11:17, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

  • "Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject.", "Use English", "Stay on topic: Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for general conversation about the article's subject (much less other subjects). Keep discussions focused on how to improve the article. Comments that are plainly irrelevant are subject to archival or removal." - All of these are from WP:TPG. There are more that can apply as well. If you still feel that what I did was in error, I suggest you go to WP:DR and follow the proper procedures there. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 11:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

NO. I _will_ summon the admin to get a DIRECT decision. I do want this silly monkey-business to get stopped. One and for all. -andy 77.7.111.146 (talk) 11:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

And AGAIN the search monkey thing: I don't want your stupid [WP:WHATEVERTHEHELL and go look there somewhere] answers. I want DIRECT links. I am not going to search like a warthog in the mud. Did I make myself clear this time? Well, I hope. -andy 77.7.111.146 (talk) 11:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Sections in these articles are unable to be linked to. They are, however, short enough to browse. I've been patient enough with you and I consider this matter closed unless an appropriate dispute resolution is opened by you. Happy editing. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 11:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Consider this matter closed? You're kidding? That will mean if I edit in my Thank you (to the artist) again you will REMOVE IT AGAIN. And what would that be for? If you consider the matter closed, you imply to NOT TOUCH it. But I'm pretty sure you WILL touch it. -andy 77.7.111.146 (talk) 11:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Your additions clearly fall within the bounds of what is not allowed on article talk pages, I have backed up this assertion with proper WP articles, and made every attempt to explain my actions to you. There is nothing left for me to do in this matter. If you re-add the material, I will revert it again if it does not follow guidelines for talk pages. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 11:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

YES! 3RR is accepted. *This* *Does* *Have* *To* *Stop*. I'm venting on air. (Why can't this dude just not leave his damn fucking MITTS outta my content!!!) It's just YOU revert without proper reason MONKEYS that have made Wikipedia worse. I want ARGUMENTS! Clear Arguments! But it seems you're running out of arguments. This is MY baby. And I will fight that you will maybe get a ban if you don't stop meddling in my business. I did sing this shit. LIVE. And I want a clear argument why I should not include a thank you there. But not on your more-than-ridiculous kind of level. I need a sort of Wikipedia barrister A third super-person who says who is on the right side. This is what I couldn't find listed in 3RR. --- There's just those times when you really are really horny on a fucking good fight and you say you MUST win it. Chop that revert-monkey's head off. Expel it. Exterminate it. -andy 77.7.111.146 (talk) 11:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

bout time, DAMMIT! *exhalates . . . ego trippin ' ' ' * — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.7.111.146 (talk) 12:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

130.54.130.241

Hi Slazenger Thank you for your edit. I actually deleted the post because I had initiated the editing/talk on Haruko Obokata's biography about the contribution of other people to her discoveries but I found out that the consensus was for my editing to be ignored. Therefore, I removed all the Talk I had initiated since it seemed I was mistaken. Let me know what you think and if we need to keep the Talk page undeleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.54.130.243 (talk) 06:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your user talk archives

Just wanted to let you know that I've declined your requests for deletion on the user talk archives: as you may remember, we generally don't delete user talk pages. If you have good reason for deletion, let me know and I'll reconsider; if I remember rightly, most of the user talk deletions I do are instances of re-archiving, e.g. someone decides to copy/paste the archive contents to a different set of pages and doesn't need the old ones anymore. Nyttend (talk) 01:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

  • I was simply trying to avoid confusion as my talk header points to those outdated manual archives now (and that template is out of my control) now that I've begun to using Miszabot to deal with my archival. If it can't be done, it's not an issue. Thank you Nyttend! --Slazenger (Contact Me) 09:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
If I understood you correctly, your problem can be solved by moving the archive pages that you do not want to be displayed in that template to a title that does not match the User talk:Slazenger/Archives/Year/Month format. Smtchahal (talk) 13:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
I just realised that I did misunderstand you. Assuming that you were talking about archives 1, 2, 3 and 4 (you recently requested deletion of these), I have appended |noarchive=yes parameter to {{talkheader}} template on your talk page. This should prevent the template from showing those archives. Smtchahal (talk) 13:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Edit

Hi,

I'm not sure which edit you're talking about as not constructive in the Waterloo, Iowa Wiki listing. I updated one individual's current occupation and added another individual who would qualify for inclusion in the list of notables. I felt both edits were constructive and appropriate. I'm not sure how this works but I'd be happy to listen to your argument regarding the edits. Take care.

Patrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prusso329 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Patrick, I reverted your edit due to the inclusion of Paco, who doesn't seem to meet Wikipedia's standard for notability. If you could find a reliable secondary source to use as a reference for the addition of Paco in the article, it would lend credence to its inclusion. Regards, --Slazenger (Contact Me) 16:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Edit

Why are you giving me my last warning for something the bot already caught? Now you're just trying to get me banned. Not cool. I'm editing constructively now. --Fadsaif (talk) 16:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of PowertripRadio

I have removed the speedy deletion template from PowertripRadio, as the author has resumed editing. —Josh3580talk/hist 18:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

The original CSD was for A1, and still applies in my opinion. The editor began editing above the CSD template, causing it to get lost. Sorry for the confusion. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 18:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
I moved the templates back to the top, and noticed that the article was basically an attack page, disparaging multiple people. I blanked the page, and added the G10 rationale. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. —Josh3580talk/hist 19:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done - --Slazenger (Contact Me) 00:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Ireland Flags

You misunderstand National flags atributed to Ireland and the UK. What is your Nationality? Ireland comprises 32 Counties. 6 of these counties comprise Northern Ireland and 26 of these counties comprise the Republic of Ireland. Together,these areas represent IRELAND, an indivisible Unit since the dawn of time. The flag of Ireland (32 Counties) is Green,White and Orange in equal proportions to represent both the Nationalist and Unionist populations equally that live in IRELAND. The flag of Great Britain does not represent IRELAND historically or currently. The flag of Great Britain represents an agglomeration of England,Wales and Scotland. The 6 county area of "Northern Ireland" is contested and so does not have an agreed flag, therefore the flag of Great Britain (England,Scotland and Wales) cannot be ascribed to it. The ancient Ulster flag represents this area,but many Plantation settlers (originally from England and Scotland) do not recognise this historical fact. You cannot place the flag of Great Britain under the sub-heading "Regions" on a Wikipedia page,because Great Britain is NOT a region. Northern Ireland/Ulster is a province of the United Kingdom/Ireland respectively. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.7.47.225 (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

  • I understand your sentiment however this article has used the flag of the United Kingdom to represent Northern Ireland for a very long time. As such, proposing to change this should be discussed on the talk page. Once a consensus is reached there, the article can be accordingly changed. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 20:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done - --Slazenger (Contact Me) 00:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your edit of Menudo (soup) was wrong. The soup is terrible, and the article should warn that. I gave reference that review the soup. I tried a kind of the soup. Although the meat looked like chicken, it was rubbery like clams or chunks of fat. I believe the references I found, because my experience of the soup is that is a terrible soup. --75.36.38.134 (talk) 21:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

no ur right its fine thnx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.105.80.130 (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You've been Huggling like a boss this afternoon; thanks for keeping things tidy! Yunshui 雲‍水 15:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done -- --Slazenger (Contact Me) 16:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Revert misclick

Just to say you may have misread the edit you reverted here, perhaps mistaking it for a mainspace edit; it was just someone making an unconvincing but innocuous argument with some links, on my talk page. --McGeddon (talk) 16:30, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Thank you McGeddon - I did indeed revert that after mistaking it to be a mainspace edit. A similar edit had been made in the mainspace by the editor and I wrongly assumed this one was as well. I've gone ahead and struck the warning from the user. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and my apologies. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 16:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done - --Slazenger (Contact Me) 16:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

DEAR RANDOM PERSON WHOM I DON"T KNOW ENJOY YOU FEAR TURKEY FROM, THE RANDOM PERSON WHO CREATED THE NOTHING

MATHEW96 (talk) 20:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Mufaddal Saifuddin

Hi, I 've never vandalised this artcile. Don't understand your message. Maybe a mistake. Ftutocdg (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done - --Slazenger (Contact Me) 21:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Regarding your vandalism accusation

I have made a new page for Cockeysville Middle School. Therefore the redirect link is not needed. Please change the redirect link to my page for Cockeysville Middle; you can find it in my contributions.

It's why I removed the redirect link, I wasn't vandalizing.

The StormCatcher (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done - --Slazenger (Contact Me) 21:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slazenger/Archives/2014/February&oldid=1140547251"