User talk:Slowthy

Vandalism to Akira (film)

I saw your edits to Akira (film). Yes, I agree with you -- it is a poorly written article that's overly verbose and has fan content. But vandalism isn't going to remedy those problems. If you want to help the situation, then why don't you actually re-write the page. Or, if you don't have time to work on it, leave a message on the Akira talk page explaining the issues that need work. They seem pretty obvious so it shouldn't take long to write them down. ₪ ask123 {t} 15:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism to Dunstable, MA

I saw your posting regarding the annual Summer Fest being run by the KKK. I have removed your edits. Don't be a jerk. Obviously you are either a child, or closed minded racist. In either case; DO NOT EDIT AGAIN. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.53.219.20 (talk) 17:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Elephant

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Elephant, you will be blocked from editing. We are sick of that moronic joke that Steve Colbert asked his groupies to do years ago. It was not funny then, and it is not funny now, either.--Mr Fink 02:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Barack Obama. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Tarc (talk) 13:38, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It had proper citations. --Slowthy (talk) 13:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A fringe, tinfoil conspiracy sourced to blogs and unreliable sources regarding an oft-debunked fairy tale of conservatism is not proper material for the Wikipedia, no. Your actions on this page are eerily similar to some recent edit warriors, so tis has been brought to the attention of WP:ANI here. Tarc (talk) 13:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What he said. Also, a lot of that essay is based on the editor's opinion on how Obama "should have behaved" under certain circumstances, and because he didn't, therefore that supports the premise. Typical conspiracy theory tactics. Totally bogus. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 14:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I recognize the content as more-or-less a direct copy from the utterly delightful Conservapedia article on Obama. Conservapedia's content policies differ from Wikipedia's, to say the least. Please review our content policies if you'd like to contribute here. Since the Obama article has been the subject of extensive abusive editing in the past, it's under article probation, meaning there is very little tolerance for editors who disregard Wikipedia's policies there. Please consider this a notification: if you continue to edit-war or insert material which blatantly violates Wikipedia's content policies, you may be restricted from editing the page or temporarily blocked from editing entirely. MastCell ^Talk 16:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Slowthy/test

Speedy deletion nomination of of User:Slowthy/test

A tag has been placed on User:Slowthy/test, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This page has nothing but redirect and it redirects itself

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User:Slowthy/test|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Katharine Beals (talk) 21:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Rubbing alcohol has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. RA0808 (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]