User talk:Somedarkwax

Speedy deletion nomination of The Snakes Bearers

Hello Somedarkwax,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Snakes Bearers for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 16:41, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The All Seeing Hand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The All Seeing Hand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The All Seeing Hand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. smileguy91^talk 00:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucifer Valentine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lucifer Valentine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ridernyc (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lycaon (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lycaon (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lycaon (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some reading for you

Hi Somedarkwax, I suggest you read WP:BAND before you create another page - this is the criteria your articles need to prove to stop them getting deleted. Cheers, Haminoon (talk) 08:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frank Lisciandro

The article Frank Lisciandro has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 22:37, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kirstine Stubbe Teglbjærg

The article Kirstine Stubbe Teglbjærg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Needs citations which are unrelated to the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jjamesryan (talk) 01:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ I think she is important on the site. Kirstine Stubbe Teglbjærg has won an award, been nomiated few times. She is important in alternatve music world. Maybe the article could be modify... But not delete.

Proposed deletion of Spotify Covers EP

The article Spotify Covers EP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable EP, fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG - a single mention on News, zero on Newspapers, Books, Scholar, Highbeam and JSTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]