User talk:Sona Sh

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shusha has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shusha was changed by Sona Sh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894179 on 2017-05-08T10:04:58+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:05, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shusha. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 59.14.213.192 (talk) 10:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable source

Plese, don't delete template "Unreliable source" from articles. I wrote all the claims on the TP. Divot (talk) 10:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

just to be clear, if you repeat this it may result in blocks.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Sona Sh, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Digital Trade Hub of Azerbaijan have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sergei Bodrov, Armenians, and Azerbaijan

1. I had to revert most of your edits on the Sergei Bodrov page. A lot of the information was incorrect (such as the date of his death and the spelling of his surname) and you removed some references. You also added two pictures, which I also removed. The picture of his childhood was irrelevant. The other picture, from one of "his movies", was also incorrect. It's not him in the picture, and it's not his movie. The movie in question is Lucky Number Slevin, which is a 2006 American film. The actor in the picture was Josh Hartnett. I did, however, rework some of the page to address its issues, and I also kept the reference that you added. If you have any ideas that you want to test out, please use the sandbox first. The edits you made to the page, though in good faith, were under-researched and disruptive.

2. Going through your contribution history, I noticed you have a political agenda of some kind. I'm guessing you are Azerbaijani. I understand the turbulent nature of the national and ethnic relations in the Caucasus, but you're going the wrong way about it. Wikipedia is not a place to delete the bits you don't like about history and spread your agenda. It is not a place to make unsourced (or poorly sourced) accusations and extend the debate further. It's not a place to spread propaganda or baselessly accuse others of it. Wikipedia is a place to objectively collect and document information. The edits you made on similar pages are disruptive and go against the spirit of Wikipedia.

That is all. AndreyKva (talk) 12:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sona Sh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Digital Trade Hub of Azerbaijan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digital Trade Hub of Azerbaijan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Trade Hub of Azerbaijan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sona Sh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]