User talk:Songwaters/Archive 1
Songwaters, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Songwaters! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC) |
Cinemascore
[edit]The Hunger Games (film) doesn't include Cinemascore. Do you think we should add it? I added it to The Hunger Games (film series) earlier but I'm not sure how best to fit it around the existing commentary in the Hunger Games article. If you think it is a good idea give it a shot, I'll back you up. -- 109.78.242.41 (talk) 23:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe it's not worth bothering with. Thanks anyway. -- 109.78.242.41 (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Songwaters. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Neutral notice
[edit]This is a neutral notice to all registered editors who have contributed to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film over the past year (Sept. 15, 2018-present) that a Request for Comment has been posted here. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit]Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to MTV Unplugged in New York, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Robvanvee 16:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 01:44, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Nice article! You know, it is eligible for posting on the main page via WP:DYK, if we can find some more sourcing and think of a good hook. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]DYK nomination of 2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan
[edit]Hello! Your submission of 2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood rename
[edit]As the original nominator of the rename discussion has been blocked for sockpuppetry, I wanted to let you know as such as they tried to influence a change in mind on your vote! here. Nate • (chatter) 21:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
DYK for 2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan
[edit]On 15 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan would have resulted in the elimination of two teams from MLB? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Neutral notice
[edit]As an editor who commented at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film between Jan. 1, 2019, and today, you may wish to join a discussion at that page, here.--Tenebrae (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Spring training
[edit]Hi - I saw your updates to MLB 2020 team pages; the term spring training should not be capitalized. Dmoore5556 (talk) 22:06, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Dmoore5556: I copied that info from 2020 Tampa Bay Rays season, which was originally capitalized. Songwaters (talk) 22:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Regardless of source, it's not correct to capitalize the term. Dmoore5556 (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Dmoore5556: All fixed. Songwaters (talk) 23:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- That's great. Thank you. Dmoore5556 (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Dmoore5556: All fixed. Songwaters (talk) 23:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Regardless of source, it's not correct to capitalize the term. Dmoore5556 (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jenny Durkan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KUOW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]February 2021 - editing history surround infoboxes.
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
2A02:C7F:76D6:600:F9EB:B18F:3930:A260 (talk) 22:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Thank you for your gracious comments at the talk page for Ian Fleming. Your apology is warmly accepted, and is reciprocated if you thought I was comparing you to the American ex-president. I referred merely to the latter's unconventional attitude to facts. You are plainly sensitive to facts, as well as courteous to your fellow editors, and we can amicably agree to differ about whether an info-box would be helpful to the reader for this particular article. Permit me to add that I am strongly pro IBs where they can adequately summarise the article. Best wishes, Tim riley talk 19:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Tim riley: I also accept your reciprocal apology. I've gone ahead and asked Jojhutton on his talk page to stop assuming bad faith and be civil (though I've clearly failed). Songwaters (talk) 19:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Splendid. I'm glad we are on friendly terms. Best, Tim riley talk 20:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 19
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sporting News Comeback Player of the Year Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Carrasco.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Precious
[edit]film and baseball
Thank you for quality articles such as 2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan, for updating baseball seasons, films and List of George Floyd protests in the United States, for "The infobox is not unnecessary clutter that discourages people from editing or reading the article" and implementing consensus, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2547 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Aw, thank you! It's all for the millions of readers who deserve to read the best Wikipedia possible. Songwaters (talk) 22:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- You said that well ;) - I said somewhere today that what we tried to reform in 2013 is happening right now, and you are part of it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Floyd protests in Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sterling Brown.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Modest flowers
[edit]Thank you for what you said on Yoninah's talk! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
You should add an email to your Wikipedia account. I want to ask you something. ~ HAL333 15:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- @HAL333: Why do you want to ask through email? Either way, I've added an email. Songwaters (talk) 16:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
DYK for 22 vs. Earth
[edit]On 30 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 22 vs. Earth, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the editor of the Pixar film Soul directed its prequel short film 22 vs. Earth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/22 vs. Earth. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 22 vs. Earth), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Percentages
[edit]Thank you for providing a needed update to The Exorcist. But do keep this in mind. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: When referring to Rotten Tomatoes scores, the universal norm on film articles is to use the percent sign, as this is what Rotten Tomatoes uses and is outlined in the Manual of Style for film articles. Also, the MOS you cite merely says that use of the word percent in non-scientific articles is common, not that it should be used. For the sake of consistency across our film articles, I would like to reinstate the percent sign on The Exorcist. Songwaters (talk) 21:00, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- That link only gives an example using the percent sign; it does not explicitly say that it should be used for RT reviews.
But instead of arguing about this further, perhaps we should open a discussion. Because I'm probably not going to be the only editor to make this change. Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- That link only gives an example using the percent sign; it does not explicitly say that it should be used for RT reviews.
Alert
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
–MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 06:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)