User talk:Spellcast/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Spellcast. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Darren Mack image
Yes, Image:Darren Mack.jpg should be undeleted. The image is irreplaceable because he is incarcerated, serving life sentence. I found the image here. Reverend X (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Allright, thanks. Reverend X (talk) 18:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete warnings
Doesn't seem like you are giving any warning before deleting images. Maybe the uploader is getting one. One of the bots gave warnings on the article talk pages to give others a chance to fix license issues. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, can you specify which image(s) you're referring to? Spellcast (talk) 18:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Helicopter air mail, 1947 .jpg and Image:First B-1, Palmdale.jpg are the 2 I saw on my watchlist today. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- OK, thanks tagging those and all. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Helicopter air mail, 1947 .jpg and Image:First B-1, Palmdale.jpg are the 2 I saw on my watchlist today. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Possible sock puppet
Hi, you blocked User:86.29.132.226 for very offensive vandalism. On that IP's talk page, User:Bsrboy made the exact same offensive vandalism and then undid it [1]. This has me suspecting that they might be the same person. Could you please check this? Thank you TheProf - T / C 22:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- User:Bsrboy also left a block notice on User talk:172.200.86.155 despite the fact he's not an admin and this IP user is not blocked, as you see here i removed it by blanking the page. As for the image problem, i'll remove it shortly :-) Thanks TheProf - T / C 22:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- I want to go offline soon, can you point out which part of Wikipedia:NFCC states a non-free image can't be used in user space? It'll save me some time! Cheers TheProf - T / C 22:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, i'll remove it now and go offline. Have a nice night :-) TheProf - T / C 22:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Protection of Frosty, Heidi & Frank
Thanks for stepping in there. I couldn't keep up with the changes fast enough to try and fix it. I wonder what happened there? Tnxman307 (talk) 19:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't know how.
I don't know how to scale down images on Wikipedia. The userboxes on my page are gigantic and I don't knowhow to scale them down because they take up too much room. Please respond,--RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 (talk) 13:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Deleted articles
Hi, I noticed that you deleted the articles Playboy's Top Party Schools 2002 and Playboy's Top Party Schools 2006 that I created (under a different user name). They were deleted through WP:PROD, but as far as I can see no warning was given to the creator. As the articles were both well written, formatted and sourced, I believe using PROD as opposed to WP:AFD was in error. I was going to put the articles up for deletion review, but I thought I'd contact you first to ask if you might restore the articles. If then you wish to nominate them for deletion, and let them go through the normal process of community debate, then that is fine with me.
Note that I am not interested in discussing the merits or viability of the articles with you through our respective talk pages, and will not engage in any such discussion. The reason for this is that I believe AfD is the correct forum for such a discussion, and to go through the arguments here would be redundant. Many thanks. Lampman Talk to me! 13:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your quick response. I actually thought about moving the lists over to Party school, which happens to be under AfD at the moment, so we'll see how it goes. Thanks anyway. Lampman Talk to me! 15:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
User:Abacuss
I apologize for reporting User talk:Abacuss more than once. I didn't realize you had blocked the user, as I didnt see a notice on the user's talk page. Flibirigit (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
OOO...look a shiny!
WikiMedal for Janitorial Services | ||
For all your great work clearing at the backlog at CAT:TEMP, I Tiptoety award you this really shiny thing! Tiptoety talk 03:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC) |
- Sure, everyone needs some recognition once in a while for all the good work they do! Tiptoety talk 03:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
hello
Please let this free image, Image:Angel Locsin.jpg exist.Thankyou {Mhtsw (talk) 05:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)}
- I don't think so; I understand that you want to help, but you're doing it in a disruptive way in order to illustrate your point. Your fanaticism and fanboyism of Angel Locsin doesn't apply here, as Wikipedia editors are expected to provide neutral and favorable contributions, not turn the article into a fan site. Any more and a block, or worse, a ban can be imposed on you for your disruption. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:57, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for Neo Steam deletion
Thanks for jumping in on Neo Steam. I tried to give the editor a chance, but he was getting a bit too much and I am thankful for a third person's intervention, Wikipedia:Consensus RULES! --Triwbe (talk) 07:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Block?
I was wondering if you could block this user. All of his edits have been vandalism to Lambda Chi Alpha. thanks Jrssr5 17:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
64.216.119.125
Hello, Spellcast ... FYI, you recently blocked 64.216.119.125 (talk · contribs) for one year, but neglected to put a notice on their talk page ... Happy Editing! — 72.75.110.142 (talk) 00:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thnx for the notice ... I was unaware of the MediaWiki:Blockedtext notification, but I thought that there should be a record of the block in their Talk page history for future reference ... Happy Editing! — 72.75.110.142 (talk) 12:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
AIV action
Two days in a row, now, on WP:AIV you've restored my faith in the usefulness of admins. My experiences with (and opinions of) most Admins here is not so good. Thanks. Rcooley (talk) 12:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Livesky.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Livesky.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lil Wayne - Lollipop.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lil Wayne - Lollipop.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
i just want to sincerely apologize for what happened in the neo steam article. my point in writing the article is to provide information regarding the said game and not to advertise it. i guess its in the manner on how the article was written. i hope i can still create the page so that everyone would know more about this game. i'm considering revising the whole article in order to comply with the rules of wikipedia. i hope you accept my apology. thanks
NeoSteam (talk) 00:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
IP User: 212.49.94.198
Thanks for blocking this user but just to note that all this users edits involved for a single purpose: stamping on Nobility templates on various fictional articles so I would like to know if you are going to leave them there or if someone is going to take them off. -71.59.237.110 (talk) 05:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Query. Help Please
Hi Spellcast. I have this doubt in my head. I am currently working on Running (No Doubt song). I want to get the article to GA class. I tried my level best, but the article is very small. Its only 9,000 bytes long. The reason is that the song was very unsuccessful and on top of that, it was released in only two countries. As a result, it has hardly any chart activities as well. It was also the last single of the album. As a result, i am unable to make it longer. But i want to make it GA as it is the only article which is keeping Rock Steady from becoming a featured topic. My question is, can an article of this length become a GA?? I hope you can understand. Reply awaited. Thank you! Indianescence (talk) 18:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for your valueable advice. I have gained the confidence and have nominated the article. It would be a dream come true if Rock Steady becomes featured topic. Thank you once again. Indianescence (talk) 04:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- I had one more doubt (sorry). If you have a look at It's My Life (Talk Talk song), we see that the Talk Talk version part is very small and improper, but the No Doubt part is good enough (Thanks to Drew!). My doubt is, if a person has to get the article to GA, he has to write even the Talk Talk section? Don't you feel it is unfair as the original version is old and cannot be made very nice. It can become a disadvantage right? Indianescence (talk) 04:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- We can do that? Awesome. I thaught there was a rule which said that cover versions have to be on the same page as the original song. I think all cover version songs on wikipedia are on the same page as the original. I have come across many such articles. Indianescence (talk) 04:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- I had that misconception because of It's All Coming Back to Me Now, as i felt that all the three version are good enough to be seperate articles, but as they are cover versions,they are together. But now i know its not the case. Thanks a lot. Indianescence (talk) 04:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- We can do that? Awesome. I thaught there was a rule which said that cover versions have to be on the same page as the original song. I think all cover version songs on wikipedia are on the same page as the original. I have come across many such articles. Indianescence (talk) 04:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- I had one more doubt (sorry). If you have a look at It's My Life (Talk Talk song), we see that the Talk Talk version part is very small and improper, but the No Doubt part is good enough (Thanks to Drew!). My doubt is, if a person has to get the article to GA, he has to write even the Talk Talk section? Don't you feel it is unfair as the original version is old and cannot be made very nice. It can become a disadvantage right? Indianescence (talk) 04:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Recommended administrators
Hello, i have created a section on my userpage for other users to find administrators recommended by me. I would like you to add yourself to the list so it can have your unique signature! Please use ~~~ to add yourself, as this will omit the date. If you do not wish to be on the list, thats okay! I respect the choice of every administrator/user on wikipedia. Have a nice day :-) TheProf - T / C 20:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
There appear to be one too many entertainers listed in the "associated acts" bit. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. As for Jennifer Lopez, I think [[Pop music|Pop]] will do. Any thoughts before I make the change? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks you!
Your advice has been really helpful. Running (No Doubt song) has become GA and Rock Steady is up for Featured Topic Candidate.[2]. If it passes, then i am sure it will be Drew's dream come true. Right now, the process is going very slow, with only one support. Indianescence (talk) 05:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your support. I never knew that Featured Topic Candidates take so long. I am leaving wikipedia forever on 28th April. I hope it passes before that. God knows what will happen to Gwen Stefani and No Doubt articles, even Drew is not here. What would hurt the most is that some editors would keep on vandalizing the articles and one fine day the articles would be up for "Removal of Featured Status". I think that was meant to happen. Indianescence (talk) 11:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think you're right. I may come back, but not majorly, that is for sure. Indian Education system is one of the toughest and keeps you horribly occupied. I can come back maybe when i get married and have a job! But till i am studying, i see very less chances. On top of that i am studying for entering Indian Institute of Technology, which requires my 100% time. Good things in life have to wait in front of the better things. Thus, wikipedia has to stay away till i have IIT. Well, thank you and all the best if your life too. Cheers. Bye. Keep up your good work. Indianescence (talk) 15:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. I really need those good lucks. Its a mad scramble for IIT. 350,000 students fight for 5,500 seats every year, and i am also one of those. Wikipedia has been a nice journey. But i am sure i will be able to come here once in a month to see whats going around. All the best in life to you too. Hoping to see you soon here. Real life caught me and arrested too! Byez. Indianescence (talk) 18:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think you're right. I may come back, but not majorly, that is for sure. Indian Education system is one of the toughest and keeps you horribly occupied. I can come back maybe when i get married and have a job! But till i am studying, i see very less chances. On top of that i am studying for entering Indian Institute of Technology, which requires my 100% time. Good things in life have to wait in front of the better things. Thus, wikipedia has to stay away till i have IIT. Well, thank you and all the best if your life too. Cheers. Bye. Keep up your good work. Indianescence (talk) 15:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Raffiny
Hi. Please could you email me the copy of the article i wrote for Raffiny? I'm trying to work out why it was deleted as not sure i follow the terminology used.. many thanks for your time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Millszola (talk • contribs) 16:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Re:
Do bother to find the fucking thing yourself.Herunar (talk) 13:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thank spam
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lil Wayne - Tha Carter.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lil Wayne - Tha Carter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Protection of Singapore article
Greetings! I saw that you had previously protected the Singapore article against non-admin moves indefinitely. The article text is also being vandalized on an ongoing basis, so edit protection was warranted. I don't like the idea of an indefinite protection there, so I set it for a six week protection (edit=autoconfirmed, move=sysop). That also means that your move protection will expire after six weeks.
I felt the text protection warranted immediate action. If you think the protection needs modified to provide additional coverage against moves, please let me know. —C.Fred (talk) 00:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vanessa Hudgens - Come Back To Me.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vanessa Hudgens - Come Back To Me.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pharrell & the yessirs out of my mind cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Pharrell & the yessirs out of my mind cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:ChrisBrownKissKiss.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:ChrisBrownKissKiss.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Queen - We Will Rock You.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Queen - We Will Rock You.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Blocking my school
NOT VERY NICE AT ALL 202.45.119.134 is our IP Ray-Rays (talk) 01:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Mill Park SC, Victoria Ray-Rays (talk) 06:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Afrosamurai.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Afrosamurai.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:I'm a flirt.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:I'm a flirt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
IP you blocked
Switching IPs, apparently. Using a few different ones. Enigma message 17:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Outta my head.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Outta my head.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Re: Re-Up Gang
No Prob. ;) QuasyBoy 1:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
History merge request
I've tried asking this to several sysops and not one of them were able to do it. Here goes: Basilisk: The Kouga Ninja Scrolls needs a history merge to Basilisk (manga) but does Basilisk (Mutant) need one with Basilisk (comics)? If you're unsure, would you happen to know anyone who can perform this task? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:DJ Jazzy Jeff & The Fresh Prince He's The DJ I'm The Rapper CD cover.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:DJ Jazzy Jeff & The Fresh Prince He's The DJ I'm The Rapper CD cover.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Doggystyle FAC
Hi Spellcast, I put the Doggystyle article up as a FAC, would you mind giving your opinion of the page ? - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 16:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
block someone?
i was thinking if you could block this user User:Bsrboy sonicthehedgehog9000(talk) 17:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
the f-word isn't nice
the f-word isn't nice —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonicthehedgehog9000 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Wallace Collins, Esq. Deletion
I believe you have not and did not research this individual completely or correctly as per your comments. He is a Lawyer and My Lawyer and i am very happy with what he has done for me and that is why i entered him in this Wikipedia, because i believed he deserved it and he is a recording artist
As far as his being a recording artist : His band was THE DYNOMITERS They were featured in 16 Magazine and other teen magazines and got press in the trades we were signed to Epic Records in 76 the most notable song was "Rock & Roll President"
I have read your Comments and reasons for deletion and find them to be prejurative and unfair this was neither Spam or Advertising he has done many cases and made Copyright Law. It is very easy to Spout nonsense and vitriol under an assumed id, i ask that you read the sources that he has on his page and if The NY TImes and Post and DMA and various industry pubs are not good enough for you then i do not understand.
See below:
His Notability is evident in that he has been cited in Major Newspaper and Music Trade Pubs, and he has made case Law in the Copyright and Trademark arenas.
Please look at his page if i did it wrong then i need someone to put a Wikipedia page up that knows what they are doing this is all very confusing to me.
http://www.wallacecollins.com/
Under his legal victories you can see the articles that have been reported on him such as; http://www.wallacecollins.com/la.html
Making Case Law
My name is Garrett Griggs i am not afraid to say things in public and hide behind a userid --Hermit711 (talk) 16:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw5.jpg http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw4.jpg http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw3.jpg http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw2.jpg
These are just some examples.
--Hermit711 (talk) 16:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review for Wallace Collins, Esq.
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wallace Collins, Esq.. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 02:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
You blocked me as a sock puppet
Hello you had recently blocked my account SBTVCAL. Please help me to be able to edit pages again. Please!!! I Will never create another account again promise just let this account SBTVCAL free on editing. I Am here in wikipedia to help articles better not to ruin it or anything. I just want to help editing as you. So please remove the blocked on my account SBTVCAL and i swear top you that this will be my last account and my permanent account here in wikipedia. Please help me! I Hope you will understand me because i only want to help here in wikipedia and to be part of Wikipedians. Please remove the block of my original account. Please!!!!Carisilm2004 (talk) 06:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Spellcast please help me. Please remove the block of my account, SBTVCAL. please!! Carisilm2004 (talk) 07:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Please unblock my account SBTVCAL, I am not editing in the neutral point of view i just only edit to help the article better, you can see it on my contribution where i only edit to help such article. Please UNBLOCK my account. This account SBTVCAL will be my permanent account and i will never make an account again please let me free on editing.Carisilm2004 (talk) 07:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
I have a report against SBTVCAL that the guy edited the article of Marian Rivera's external links named Marianne Rivera POKPOK atitude sa likod ng camera and that video in YouTube is inappropriate unless I flagged that video and the reason is adult fighting. THANKS!!! Unknownquinones (talk) 09:14, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
?
what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamalar (talk • contribs) 15:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Requesting a merge request
Did you see this? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Blocking
I ask that you use good sense and proper warnings before blocking people in the future. This is an IP used by more than 17 people, and when you quickly block it without warning, you shut us all out. 12.202.75.101 (talk) 16:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
blueprint
Its completely pointless as to why you reverted it back. I reverted it back so that reviews such as XXL and The Source will be shown. What was the point of deleting what i did? Your the one who was not constructive in point of that situation. You should read it first before making such false claims. Thanks. --76.67.75.140 (talk) 02:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Spellcast, do you know how to fix listboxes? There's one on Diana DeGarmo that I've been trying to fix (Diana DeGarmo#American Idol), and I was wondering if you knew how to fix them. Thanks. Acalamari 22:04, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! :) Acalamari 16:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Album Reviews
The standard listed at wikiproject albums is unnecessarily broad, and there are generally enough reviews to sites that are both reliable and notable to justify (IMO) removal of sites that don't fit both criteria. I can only think of one case where my removal of nn sites left an article with no reviews at all, and I'll refrain from doing that in the future. I know Sputnikmusic is OK, and I leave that one alone; if I removed any links to there it was by accident. I will admit, though, that it bugs me that they don't merit a wikipedia article and yet are specifically listed at wikiproject albums. 66.93.12.46 (talk) 01:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have started a discussion about what constitutes a review worthy of inclusion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums, and I would be interested to hear your thoughts. 66.93.12.46 (talk) 03:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Awards
I'm a little puzzled about the rationale given for removing factual reference to awards won from the lead of film actors. You cited WP:APT, which does not address the inclusion of factual awards, so I am at a loss as to how that is a peacock term. The generic use of "award-winning" may be using peacock term, but that is a non-specific reference. The other cite was for MOS:FILM, which is actually a WP:WikiProject Films style guideline, which covers inclusion in film articles, not biographies of actors. Actors are a function of WP:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers under WP:WikiProject Biography, neither of which address the inclusion of specific awards in the lead of a film actor's biography at all, much less include a directive against it. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:43, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- I've looked over the WT:Neutral point of view/Archive 29#POV in first sentence? and I don't honestly see that a consensus was formed that this is an unacceptable inclusion. There was a lot of discussion, and many points were raised on both sides, but I saw no decision that it should be removed. One point in the NPOV discussion stood out to me: "Featured articles are considered to be the best articles in Wikipedia, as determined by Wikipedia's editors. Before being listed here, articles are reviewed at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates for accuracy, neutrality, completeness, and style according to our featured article criteria." Bette Davis is a featured article, featured on the main page on April 5, and in anticipation of that was intensely gone over by FA committee members to assure it still met the criteria. The statement wasn't contested. I recognize that this is your viewpoint, but I'm not convinced it implies bias, and a style guideline determination by a project that doesn't govern this particular category doesn't, to me, mandate its applicability elsewhere. I noticed in the discussion that someone raised the question of someone like Carl Lewis, whose article also includes his awards in the lead sentence. In the case of Davis, the awards and nominations were won, but they also function to define her as one of the most prominently accoladed actresses. Your example of Carmen Electra is humorous, but I'd point out that winning Academy Awards requires a great deal more consensus of the acting community than an award that was conceived by a small number of people intended to be an insult. What distinguishes Davis' career from that of, for example, Joan Davis, as a film, television and stage actress, is the awards. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
you have distroied a long work...on gwen stefani discography...you have deleted a lot of information!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cacarlo92 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Copy-edit
Hi Spellcast, I was wondering if you could help me out ? I've seen you do some copy-edits before and was hoping you could do one on the Doggystyle ? A user has requested it at the FAC and I doubt it'll pass before it receives one. A partial list of what has to be changed is on FAC page, but I think the article would need a complete copy-edit to be up to standards. I don't know if your a big copy-editor or whatever, but I think you would really help the page, since you seem to know what to look for. Please get back to me soon :) Thanks in advance. - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help man, I really appreciate it - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 20:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hi again, (don't worry, it's not another copy-edit request) I was just wanting to ask you something. Your a member of Wikiproject Hip hop right ? I was thinking that all the current hip hop editors should try to get together and try to make the project active again. There's alot of people who I think could contribute to the project and get more hip hop-related articles to GA and FA, we just need to get these users to work on something together. I was personally thinking of restarting the member list because most of the people on it aren't editing anymore or just don't contribute to the project any longer (not to mention the page is a right mess), but I wanted other people to agree with that decision before I go around making massive changes to a WikiProject. Also, I was thinking of changing the current collabo because i'm pretty sure on-one is working together to improve Rapping, or even willing to. I think an album that everybody loves would be our best bet. I mean, when the project started they got Illmatic to FA, so it shows people can work together to get a hip hop album article up to the highest standards. What do you think ? - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Thablockishot.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Thablockishot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thanks
Since they are technically people too, would A7 count for primates? lol. ViperSnake151 15:23, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Undeletion
Please undelete the files Image:AllenWest Mythbusters.png and Image:ClarenceAnglin Mythbusters.png so they can illustrate the subjects in the articles Allen West (attempted Alcatraz escapee) and Clarence Anglin. Reverend X (talk) 18:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, and also...
Hello! Thank you for responding to my WP:AIV report against the vandalism by the IP account 139.222.126.24. I am interested in helping Wikipedia root out vandals. However, I don't know how to find them -- I sort of stumbled on this one by accident. Is there a particular section or page that I can monitor to help you keep an eye out for these digital ruffians? Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, but I am using Internet Explorer and it doesn't appear that Twinkle works there (at least there is no mention of IE on the Twinkle page). Does it work on IE, or is there another tool? (I am not a Mozilla fan.) Thanks again. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, I do a lot of article work (see my User Page) and I am involved with AfD and CSD input. I also try to sweep out the WP:Backlog of inadequate articles. I just wanted to get more involved in other aspects of this site. Thank you for your help! Ecoleetage (talk)
Ecoleetage (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- Much appreciated. The Salma Hayek vandal was a first-timer (literally, its Wikipedia debut), and I suspected the user was about to go haywire elsewhere. Thanks for the guidance. Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
cacosmia
cacosmia, smelling feces all the time, is a proven medical condition. See here
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/cacosmia
Also current issue of discover magazine
Wikigbgb (talk) 16:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Why did you remove "Academy Award-winning" from Cate Blanchett's article? I put that there because from what I can see that is the format for any Academy Award winning or nominated actor on Wikipedia. It wasn't a matter of repetition, as that is the summarization of the subject or person, and I personally look there to see if the actor in question has won or been nominated. Miketanton (talk) 00:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
RS
Hi, can I use this article as RS for some statistical figures in the article Cuba-Pakistan relations? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Otolemur. Unfortunately, this isn't my area of expertise, so I can't with say with certainty if it's a reliable source or not. If the site doesn't have any sort of agenda, I think it should be ok. If in doubt, you can always try the reliable sources noticeboard. Cheers, Spellcast (talk) 14:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- I am not using it as reference. I will use other mainstream newspapers for any useful information. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eminem - Sing for the Moment CD cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Eminem - Sing for the Moment CD cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
212.219.94.107
Hi Spellcast. You sure this is an open proxy? Could you also not routinely block proxies indefinitely, as they rarely remain open for long. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry I see the tell-tale edit. Is it an exit server and do you have the port or entry IP for future checking? School proxies don't tend to remain open for more than a couple of months. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
user:I'm On Base
FYI, Wikilover222 (talk · contribs) requested an unblock of 67.189.185.73 (talk · contribs), which you had hard blocked as the IP of I'm On Base (talk · contribs). I have changed the block message of the IP to not use {{anonblock}} since that template invites the user to log in - an impossibility with a hard block and, since presumably it is a static non-shared IP, not something we want anyway. I have also indefblocked the account Wikilover222 under the assumption that it is a sleeper sock of your banned user. Please feel free to review any of the above. --B (talk) 15:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
My Rfa
|
Hi there. I think you speedy deleted this article earlier, at the request of the author? It has re-appeared, and I've tagged it with needing some sections. I don't know if you think it should be speedily deleted again, just thought I'd bring it to you attention in case you didn't already know Ged UK (talk) 10:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I know you do not capitalize "da" but that's how the producer spells it out and writes it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.127.129.67 (talk) 17:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Re: User:64.88.86.3
If you're imposing a proxy block, perhaps you should say so on the blocking reason; {{schoolblock}} is anon-only, so gives the wrong message, as seen at User talk:Eceresa. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 14:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, via this. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 15:20, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't get involved with that stuff, and I don't know how restrictive policy is being there. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 15:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for removing the hard block on 64.88.86.3. Eceresa (talk) 22:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- And thanks for the email. I'll pass it along. Eceresa (talk) 00:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Linkin Park - Papercut CD cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Linkin Park - Papercut CD cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey
Hey Spellcast, I was just wondering whether you could help me out a little. I was just working on the Curtis article and re-formatted all of the charts, tables and added a whole bundle of refs. However, my tables arent going to plan. There over at User:The-G-Unit-Boss/Sandbox#Charts, could you try and see whats going wrong. Also do you think thmy version is any better than the ones on the Curtis page? Thanks. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 10:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Usher-raymond-album-1994.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Usher-raymond-album-1994.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Troubles with other user
User Cuban789 continues to post unsourced info to Year of the Gentleman (view history) and I have already made three reverts, and trying not break the three revert rule. Can you step in? DiverseMentality(Discuss it) 04:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Negro please. I do not understand why Wikipedia users are such pricks. My stuff always gets reverted and I always end up being right. So whatever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cubfan789 (talk • contribs) 04:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Allhiphop screenshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Allhiphop screenshot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
BL req
Hi - I've listed the ukmix.org/forums req you made for now - links do seem excessive for a "forum" site which would not normally be that acceptable. I've done nothing about removing the links though so expect some screaming. I see some of the more active BL members appear to be awol for now so apologies for the delay :) Cheers --Herby talk thyme 11:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nas - Hero.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nas - Hero.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Your blocking of 88.177.133.114
Hi there. I saw you block the IP I reported at AIV. Aren't you supposed to leave the block details on the ip's talk page? Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 12:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Boy! Thanks for clarifying. I was only wondering coz the previous admin had the blocktext on the ip's talk page. Nevertheless, this clears my doubts. Thanks again. Have a good weekend! Mspraveen (talk) 12:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Peaceful Journey.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Peaceful Journey.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Juelz The Second Coming.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Juelz The Second Coming.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:GangstaGrillzAlbum.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:GangstaGrillzAlbum.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Odbasonunique.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Odbasonunique.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Question
What do you think of this? Sock? Acalamari 23:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Unfortunately, while I agree we'll have to see how they go, their recent edits don't seem to show that they've learned anything regarding images. Acalamari 20:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Explosions
Thank you. Giano (talk) 16:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Second opinion
Hello. User:LegalFiction had created James Sears, which was deleted for WP:BLP concerns. I also saw a lack of notability. Creator asked me to look at User:LegalFiction/James Sears, his attempt to address prior issues and construct an article. I would apprciate any fedback you could give me or User:LegalFiction. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 19:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | ||
For your great work at providing many free images for the encyclopedia. Acalamari 18:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC) |
- You're welcome! Acalamari 16:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:Californication
As I stated in the edit summary, the contents from the Pitchfork review are already included in the article's "Critical response". Enough ratings are listed in the infobox as it is, with Pitchfork being a secondary or not as notable publication. NSR77 TC 16:31, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Do you, honestly, feel it is absolutely essential to include it? No. Naerii and I, who brought this article to Featured status, both agreed that it should remain rather small and down to the most notable publications. This is such a trivial issue. I don't know why you're pushing it. NSR77 TC 22:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
William G Hobbs
Why did you deleted the article William G Hobbs, Canadian Artist on the 7th July 2008 ?
00:32, 7 July 2008 Spellcast (Talk | contribs) deleted "Dr William Hobbs" (Speedy deleted per (CSD R1), Redirect to deleted page "William G. Hobbs".) stavros1 ♣
Hello Spellcast
Thank you for your speedy response! It is an article that I have contributed to and think it is worthy of restoration. Hobbs’s paintings are slowly gaining a reputation because of there content about railways in Canada. As I understand Hobbs is still alive and kicking but is of a good age now. One day his work will be of some significants because of its content. I would like to see it reinstated. ".) stavros1 ♣
Hello Spellcast
Many thanks for that!
Where is the page confirming that this is an open proxy? --Chris (talk) 15:49, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- As this is now closed, we should probably at least make the block anon-only. --Chris (talk) 02:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
This user has been asking for unblock from an autoblock you placed; no one has handled it in about in quite a while. If you could look into this, please do. The Evil Spartan (talk) 07:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Dr. Love Monkey
See the recent vandalism to Bismuth. How come this userpage has been deleted and their TALK protected, but the account itself is still vandalizing and is not blocked? What's up? SBHarris 18:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- But what's the point of blanking the TALK page and THEN protecting it? Of what possible use to anyone is a blank protected page?? Leave the record of the blocks and warnings on the page, and protect THOSE, so other people can SEE that something has been done about the vandal. Instead of wasting their time like I did! SBHarris 20:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sbharris"
User:StJamesIII
StJamesIII is continuously breaking the external links guideline in Ginuwine by adding his brother's MySpace page, which is completely irrelevant to the article (history). I've asked him to not add the link in his talk page, but all he does is copy and paste what I write and reflects everything back at me. He must not take me seriously just because I'm not an administrator here, so I thought you'd be king enough help. DiverseMentality(Discuss it) 22:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I just put a one-week block on this IP, which resumed vandalism just minutes after your previous block expired. Since there seems to be a question about whether this is an open proxy, and because you seem to be familiar with its activity, I wanted to let you know. Dppowell (talk) 04:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:3lw No More.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:3lw No More.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Turkey City Writer's Workshop
Why did you delete the page for this workshop, given that it is, in fact, very well known, many famous science fiction writers (Bruce Sterling, Howard Waldrop) are members, and there are now numerous red links from their pages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.136.25.72 (talk) 17:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
The Sinus Show
Why was this deleted? It was an article about a well known Austin Texas Comedy troupe that was involved with Best Brains (creators/owners of Mystery Science Theater 3000). It was notable, and was deleted for no reason. Please undelete this promptly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indecks (talk • contribs)
Help reverting deletion you proposed
Hi, I am the original creator of the page still visible in the Google cache.
However, I have been living outside my everyday home (I had to relocate temporarily to follow medical care for my newborn son), so I did not notice earlier that that page ("Purgatório") had been submitted for deletion.
To add "insult to injury", I do not have my user password now, and wikipedia says the following when I try to request a new password: "Error sending mail: There is no e-mail address recorded for user "Andabata"."
Since you were the one that caused the deletion of that page, can you help me? My e-mail is (I am inserting dashes to avoid spam bots, in case this ends up in a public page):
l-e-o-n-e-l-m-@-u-t-a-d-.-p-t
Please do not reply on my Talk page, since I will only be able to login in September.
Sincerely,
Andabata
Welcome??????????????/
I don't know how to take your welcome. You welcome me but then you went to an administrator and requested my USERPage be deleted without even sending me any messages about it if you felt that my was at issue. I left your friend a message....as well. You all seem to be a bit on the unfriendly side. As I stated to your friend i have no problems with being corrected but to just assume things and report without even talking to me doesn't foster a positive atmosphere where people can contribute freely within the guidelines. Thanks for welcoming me and then reporting me as if i'm some sort of trouble maker. wow. oh and check your friends page so you can see my message to him as well. StJamesIII (talk) 23:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Could I use these images?
Hello, could I use these photos in articles Richard Steve Goldberg and Jon Schillaci, or do I have to make OTRS request or something?
link link 2 Reverend X (talk) 11:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
your view
If you have time, I would appreciate your view here, as i'm unhappy at the small number of us commenting so far. Thank you. 86.44.17.205 (talk) 18:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Replied there. Spellcast (talk) 08:12, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
David Edgerton
David Edgerton (historian) is important enough for Wikipedia- the vast majority of Google search results relate to him.
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellie's.pencils (talk • contribs) 16:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bringemoutticover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bringemoutticover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Re: XxJoshuaxX
Concerning the blocking of this user - I can't see the evidence because I'm not an admin, so I'm wondering if a checkuser will be run or not? I ask because there's another editor who seemed unusually supportive of XxJoshuaxX, and has been doing much the same kind of edits (title capitalization, moving a lot of music-related pages for trivial reasons), and I wonder if this editor might be another sock?
If this none of my damned business, please feel free to tell me so. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 22:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, checkuser isn't needed because he already revealed his IP, which is from the same location and ISP as his previous ones. If the other user you're referring to is user:Xnux, it's definitely not him. Spellcast (talk) 04:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, I appreciate the info. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 06:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
using proxies to confirm proxy status
Like you did here: Special:Contributions/170.210.215.253. How do you do that? I mean, how do you use a proxy without going to the host's website? J.delanoygabsadds 00:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
XxJoshuaxX
Good day Spellcast, I see you wanted XxJoshuaxX blocked on Commons, I've now blocked the user. Next time the admin board on Commons might be faster! Thanks for the info about the sockpuppet. --Kanonkas : Talk 12:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Should a year be enough on that ip? --Kanonkas : Talk 12:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Seems like the Herby and Lar wants to unblock the ip and XxJoshuaxX. It seems like a checkuser request is the only way we're going to make them believe it. --Kanonkas : Talk 13:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
serial template vandal
Hi, I saw you blocked User:2jr923jf9fj29fjj98. This guy has been vandalizing with various accounts for a while now (User:CJF2F2NF29J, User:19838j819j91, User:J2138r9j98f392j, User:Fj2fn29fk29k9, etc.) Do you know if there's been any discussion of him? Or where I should start one? I'm thinking maybe we should look into an IP-range block for a while, but don't know where to start. Thanks! --JaGa (talk) 16:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
regarding /wiki/Cody_Cooper
why have you put a message on my page, i am new to wikipedia and don't understand?
thanks, cody
--Cody.feilding.nz (talk) 09:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
HostForWeb Block
Hi... that HostForWeb block is a little excessive. They only have 205.234.128.0/23, but you blocked 205.234.128.0/17. Can you prune that back? I can't edit from work now.—Chowbok ☠ 22:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, I see the problem. You're under the impression that ServerCentral and HostForWeb are the same company. They're not; ServerCentral is just HostForWeb's upstream provider (and the upstream for lots of other companies); they're not a webhosting company. Those IPs are HostForWeb's. Can you change the block to just HostForWeb's allocations? Here they are:
- 205.234.128.0/23
- 205.234.132.0/24
- 205.234.134.0/24
- 205.234.136.0/22
- 205.234.140.0/23
- 205.234.144.0/23
- 205.234.146.0/24
- 205.234.163.0/24
- 205.234.186.0/23
- 205.234.198.0/24
- 205.234.201.0/24
- 205.234.212.0/23
- 205.234.214.0/23
- 205.234.222.0/23
- 205.234.232.0/24
- 205.234.234.0/23
- 205.234.253.0/24
- Thanks...—Chowbok ☠ 16:25, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm at 205.234.237.186. If you could un-block it, that'd be great. I still think the /17 block is excessive, though.—Chowbok ☠ 17:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! I only edit through this account, I never do IP edits. I was kinda surprised when I couldn't edit, since I didn't think IP blocks affected registered users, but I guess it's different for proxy blocks? Anyway, I had to log in to my home PC remotely to message you. Appreciate your help.—Chowbok ☠ 17:41, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm at 205.234.237.186. If you could un-block it, that'd be great. I still think the /17 block is excessive, though.—Chowbok ☠ 17:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
proxies
Hello Spellcast.
I have recently become interested in blocking open proxies. However, I don't think that I know very much about the subject.
Currently, when I block proxies, I log out of my account from Firefox and log into my account from Safari. I then look at the list here and configure Firefox to connect via proxy using the IP addresses listed, one by one. After saving my settings in Firefox, I check to see if I can view webpages. If I can view pages, I go to Special:Mytalk to double-check that it is not my own IP address. If everything is in order, I block the IP from Safari and then add {{blockedproxy}}
to the talk page using the proxy in Firefox.
Is this method overly labor-intensive? Is there an easier way to do this?
I am currently testing IPs for open proxies on ports 80, 200, 3128, 6588, 8000 and 8080. Are there any more ports that I should be trying?
Thanks for your time, J.delanoygabsadds 15:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- If I can access https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Main_Page with a proxy, should I block it? J.delanoygabsadds 15:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:CHICAGO
According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (List of Kanye West awards) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the cleanup work on those User:Radioinfoguy proxies. Gwen Gale (talk) 15:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for creating additional Eric B. & Rakim singles articles. This has been something on my 'to-do' list for a while. I've noticed you updating the template I created with the new articles. So kudos, barn stars and all that good shit to you. --Endless Dan 19:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I see you have bumped into this editor some time ago looking at his/her block log. Can I just say, this editor is one of the most annoying I have come across. Unfortunately I happen to watchlist some of the articles he/she tampers with. Jamalar is an obsessive music genre changer on albums and artists. Jamalar does not us edit summaries or talk pages to build consensus for his/her point of view. Warnings are removed in bulk, making it difficult to see the full extent of the months long disruption. I also strongly believe he/she is doing it when not signed in too. There is one IP range that has a very similar editing pattern to Jamalar. I would appreciate it if you could do an extensive review of Jamalar's contributions and review removed warnings on his/her page. Thank you. — Realist2 17:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers, the IP ranges begin 87.196. .... They edit the same articles as Jamalar and are obsessive genre changers too. Even if they aren't his/her IP's, Jamalars actions have still been highly disruptive. Thank you. — Realist2 23:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- As a heads up Jamalar is still changing genres passed on her/his pov. — Realist2 18:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- User:87.196.6.108, User:87.196.214.79, User:87.196.144.26 and User:87.196.46.128 are a few examples. There are many more, you can see probably most of them by going back in the edit history of the Loose (album). I haven't seen them there as much recently, maybe they are Jamalar, maybe they are not. My major concern is Jamalar him/her self. Cheers, sorry for delay. — Realist2 18:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- As a heads up Jamalar is still changing genres passed on her/his pov. — Realist2 18:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Cheers, but Jamalar and her "contributions" are still at it. She is reverting or even rollbacking editors with a lot more experienced than her (people who actually know how the genre template is meant to work). This has got to stop, she won't do it voluntarily and never discusses anything. Could you at the very least warn her if your not prepared to wield the ban hammer? :-O. This IP User:86.25.51.104 recently blanked Jamalars talk page. Jamalar hasn't reverted the IP and they both edit the same-ish articles. More than likely this is Jamalars IP, who knows what it holds. — Realist2 14:26, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, this has been a long overdue block (not your fault, I and others should have been more pro-active in stopping this). I fully expect her to continue this as she usually wins an argument through sheer determination. If I see it again I won't hesitate to contact you. I won't monitor the IP's as it's too much hastile, but I'm watching Jamalar like a hawk until she learns. Thank you for taking action. — Realist2 13:32, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
You can probably add User talk:86.29.252.104 to this list as well. Recently active on Gwen Stefani.The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 07:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Done. See the talk page. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 08:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Jamalar is STILL using this IP. Enough is enough. She used the IP on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd of September, effectively the block on her account was useless. More needs to be done to stop this. — Realist2 19:26, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thinks have gotten a little more confusing. The story thickens. here. — Realist2 19:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanx for upgrading the block, it seems that Jamalar uses IP's that begin with 86. so if we see any that are editing music articles in that fashion we know it's Jamalar. The block extends and the IP is blocked too. I'm sure Jamalar is smart enough to catch on eventually. — Realist2 22:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thinks have gotten a little more confusing. The story thickens. here. — Realist2 19:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Jamalar is STILL using this IP. Enough is enough. She used the IP on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd of September, effectively the block on her account was useless. More needs to be done to stop this. — Realist2 19:26, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Another IP of Jamalar's, arbitrarily changing genres. Is it time for a range block? — Realist2 17:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Could Jamalar be so obsessed that she would travel to france I wonder? — Realist2 17:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Another IP, changing genres again. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- And another. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 23:22, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- And another here. I think it's time for a range block of some sort? — Realist2 17:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers, I'm trying to monitor the articles Jamalar edits. It's a shame Jamalar has had to behave like this. — Realist2 16:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Another here. Jamalar also made at least 2 new accounts today as well, which have been blocked. Is there no way to pin point where Jamalar is from and range block that place? Or is it a case of keep trying until we get the right one? I'm no expert on this IP stuff, although I have learnt a bit thanx to Jamalar lol. — Realist2 19:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers, I'm trying to monitor the articles Jamalar edits. It's a shame Jamalar has had to behave like this. — Realist2 16:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- And another here. I think it's time for a range block of some sort? — Realist2 17:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Camille Jones vs. Fedde le Grand - The Creeps.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Camille Jones vs. Fedde le Grand - The Creeps.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk page
You were getting some IP vandalism here, so I semiprotected -- remove when you feel like it.
And wasn't it nice of Avril boy to identify all those open proxies for us? NawlinWiki (talk) 21:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Open proxy for 189.112.192.3
I think which my problem was resolved, the proxy was closed. Cannibaloki 15:57, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Re: Gerald Gonzalez IP range
No, I'm not using the 222.127.x.x range; I had a photo of him in an Internet cafe, as taken from his Youtube account, which explains the multiple IPs. And since most ISPs here just pool addresses (via NAT or something), edits from one IP may be attributed to several users. I once received a message when I logged out, concerning the current IP that I'm using, regarding the edits to a certain article, which I didn't vandalize at all... Blake Gripling (talk) 10:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Logging in please wait
He's requesting unblock. Other than being a common computing phrase, is there a reason that's against name policy? Daniel Case (talk) 20:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I figured there was more to this than meets the eye. I see the request was already declined. Thanks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
IP Vandal
I've had to go through all edits by 90.205.26.67, and they seem to be entirely vandalism and no useful contributions. Is a block in order here? I tried to report yesterday at AIV but kept getting an error message when trying to post so gave up. Mjroots (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Pardus
I'd like to ask you to reconsider deleting the Pardus (computer game) page. If you look at the history, it was deleted before mostly due to lack of any references. Noteability was not an issue. I worked hard verifying all the references in the current version- and I also went to great effort to be sure it is all unbiased. Please take another look, I'm confident it meets all Wikipedia's guidelines. Thanks. Viridus (talk) 16:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
User:Wuqiqiang and other spammers
I dunno, but after performing a Google search on that guy, I saw some splog post at http://www.pcbke.com/read.php/126.htm. What do you think? Blake Gripling (talk) 00:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Blocking of User:78.40.239.4
Hi,
Sorry I couldn't ask this earlier, but this all happened just as my lunch break finished, so I was unable to follow it up then. Work's over for now, so I now have chance to ask this. I'm still a fairly fresh from RFA, so please excuse me if I'm asking the obvious, but why did you block User:78.40.239.4? As I see it, this anon user has only carried out one item of vandalism since the block was lifted a month or so back [3]. This was reverted, and a final warning [4] was placed on the talk page. The user who placed the warning then immediately placed a report at AIV [5], which I looked in to. I suspect that you did so at the same time. I did not find any further evidence of vandalism since the one and only warning (which I felt was insufficient), so placed a comment on AIV stating so [6], and downgraded the warning on the IP's talk page, as this was the first offence since the block was lifted [7].
I was in the process of writing a note to the user who left the report, when I noticed that you had blocked IP for 2 years (I should point out that warning at the top of the IP's talk page does state "anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time"), so I didn't bother posting the note on the user's talk page. Instead, rather than reversing your block, I should check up with you as to why you blocked, in case I have missed something obvious. BTW, if the block is going to stand, isn't there a block note that needs to go on the Talk page?
Thanks, StephenBuxton (talk) 16:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, you blocked this user in March 2008 as a username block; may I ask why? The user contacted OTRS to submit a photo and couldn't understand why he was blocked. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 23:45, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Query on blocks
Hello. While working on AIV today, I noticed that you almost never leave block notices for the vandals in question. Just curious, but why is that? Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 21:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism to my talk &/or user page(s)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Here you go
Giggy (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
[8] Giggy (talk) 02:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Westside Connection.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Westside Connection.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vanessa Hudgens - Say OK.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vanessa Hudgens - Say OK.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
RfA stats
Thanks for adding all the nominations. With everyone helping, the data will get completed a lot faster than one person doing it all. Majorly talk 22:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Easynet complaint re 82.110.0.0/16 block
The UK ISP Easynet has requested in email to unblock-en-l that the rangeblock you did today on 82.110.0.0/16 be reviewed and narrowed to the actual proxy. That /16 apparently consists of numerous commercial and academic customers, so it appears to have been too widely set.
Can you let us know what the specific issue was that prompted the block, and what range it can be narrowed to which only affects the specific Easynet customer subnets with the proxy problem?
Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 18:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Easynet has sent more information - apparently the IP range 82.110.0.0 - 82.110.0.15 is a single customer known as Rapidata Services, and Easynet hypothesizes that you misunderstood what CIDR notation is appropriate to block that range.
- If the range that the proxy is in is just that set of 16 IP addresses (82.110.0.0 to 82.110.0.15) then that's really a /28 CIDR block - 16 addresses in bits is 4 bits over, so 32-4 = 28. The rangeblock on /16 got everything from 82.110.0.0 to 82.110.255.255 - 64,000 plus addresses not just 16.
- Without knowing what proxy addresses you actually spotted I don't know for sure if that's the problem, but if you can check and let us know I'd appreciate it.
- If we don't hear back from you within a couple of hours I'm going to reduce the rangeblock to 82.110.0.0/28 temporarily, until we hear from you about what the correct details were.
- Thanks! Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 19:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Not specifically related to that range, but while I was zipping back through the logs of blocks you've made to see if I could find more small nets / specific IPs you blocked near that range previous to the /16 rangeblock, I noticed that you've made a fair number of other large indefinite rangeblocks with the block message of proxy block. This is somewhat concerning - It's very unusual for large ranges of IPs to actually contain many proxies (other than the megaproxy.com one ...). What sort of criteria are you using to determine that the whole large IP net are a problem? Thanks... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 19:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Open proxy block for 161.200.255.162
Hello. On 4 September you blocked 161.200.255.162 (talk) (contribs) (block log) with the summary "{{blocked proxy}}: <!-- ecamp.ee.eng.chula.ac.th/CGIProxy/nph-proxy.cgi -->" I have contacted the subdomain's administrator and the page has been taken off the web. Would it be possible to change the block back to anon. only? --Paul_012 (talk) 14:52, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Enemies in Doom
Hi Spellcast,
I noticed that List of enemies in Doom was nominated for deletion last year and that you declared the result of the discussion "delete". Why does the article still exist?
Also, you may want to consider archiving your talk page. It took a while for my computer to upload all 100+ discussions, and I'm sure others would appreciate your creating an archive as well.