Jump to content

User talk:Squiddyonwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello, Squiddyonwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay and continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Below are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! User:Samoht27 (talk) 01:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Samoht27 (talk) 01:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Squiddyonwiki! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.


As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 10:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Zxcvbnm, thanks for the feedback. I've created a new draft for all Papa Louie games that therefore expands my article, and therefore sources that have covered this: Draft:Papa_Louie_(game_series)
I can currently add more within my development/gameplay section but cannot find if this source is reliable: https://gameluster.com/review-papas-freezeria-deluxe-sundae-fundae/
After doing a sweep it seems they have an experienced senior staff and employed writers, though I do not see it listed anywhere in VG sources. Apart from this though, I have added IGN, Apple, AG.ru, and other 'mixed' sources such as Dexerto, GameRant, TheGamer, and PCGamer. Squiddyonwiki (talk) 20:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Squiddyonwiki: I've never seen GameLuster used on Wikipedia before. I'd err on the side of "unreliable" - much of the staff seems like students or freelancers, and a few of the editors don't even have pictures. It screams blog to me and if I wouldn't use it for a major game, we shouldn't make an exception for a minor one either.
My source analysis: (1) is a database entry, so it doesn't count towards notability. (2) is a primary source. (3) is TheGamer, SIGCOV and counts towards notability. (4/6) is GameRant, Valnet site and doesn't count towards notability. (5) HG101, counts towards notability but SIGCOV unclear. (7) Dexerto, content farm and doesn't count towards notability. (8/9) are database entries, no notability. (10) is arguably a primary source due to the advertising motive. (11) PCGamer, a reliable source but clearly trivial coverage of the series as a whole. (12) GameLuster, probably not notable.
My overall verdict is that there is 1 obvious SIGCOV (TheGamer), and 1 that I don't think is SIGCOV but some might say it is (HG101). Given the typical basis of 3 reliable, significant sources to pass GNG it's not quite there yet in my opinion. Hope that helped. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 21:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I really appreciate all this feedback with in depth explanations. If you can tell I'm pretty passionate about this and am confident I can bring it to publishing status! Will continue to work on it. Squiddyonwiki (talk) 21:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Squiddyonwiki (talk) 21:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, looks like I've done all I can -- added a print source, other SIGCOV (TheGamer, HG101, Gamezebo, Pocket Gamer) ... going to submit, and hoping for the best. Appreciate your guidance and experience @Zxcvbnm Squiddyonwiki (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to allow someone else to review the page, since I already rejected your page once before, but I would almost definitely turn down this one too, unfortunately. I did note the additional GameZebo source existing before, but it is solely about one game rather than the series in general, and a ground rule on Wikipedia is that notability cannot be inherited, otherwise there would be a studio article for every video game simply because it was notable by association. There is precedent for lists being created out of otherwise individually non-notable things, but this wouldn't pass WP:LISTN either.
A common error with new editors is thinking that they can WP:OVERCOME lack of notability with sheer effort. It's helpful to read the aforementioned essay there whether or not your page gets rejected. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 15:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that there is a possibility it also gets accepted because people have differing opinions on GameRant as proof of notability. But I vehemently believe it is not. There are just so many generally low-effort articles that they pump out that if it really was the case, we'd have an article on every Pokemon, every Street Fighter character, etc. but they'd all be bad. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 15:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kiner Music has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kiner Music. Thanks! -- NotCharizard 🗨 06:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Notcharizard! Newer here -- I've noticed when I use the basic {{ cite web }} edit to add a source that I've already cited, it re-populates and recognizes itself as a different source -- if that makes sense.
Is there an article that can show me how to cite something multiple times without having to fill the reference list with it over and over again?
For example, let's say I want to cite a source referenced as source #12. If I want to cite this source again, how do I make sure it's still cited as sourced #12 rather than creating a whole other number? Squiddyonwiki (talk) 06:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I usually use the visual editor for references rather than code, where you go to "cite" and there's an option for "re-use" (next to "manual" and "automatic").
Having a look at the code in a draft in my sandbox, it looks like the coding is basically <ref name=":2">{{cite web stuff here}}</ref> and then later to use the same reference you can just do <ref name=":2" /> and that should work. -- NotCharizard 🗨 06:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! this was really helpful and I implemented it in my other drafts. Appreciate it! Squiddyonwiki (talk) 17:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dinosaur Polo Club has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dinosaur Polo Club. Thanks! -- NotCharizard 🗨 07:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinosaur Polo Club has been accepted

[edit]
Dinosaur Polo Club, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

* Pppery * it has begun... 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]

On your user page it says "I mainly make/suggest edits in articles that I have a personal connection to or are related to my job." I'm assuming you mean things you have an interest in and learn about through your job, but I think be careful with wording, because on Wikipedia "personal connection" often means in a conflict of interest type way. -- NotCharizard 🗨 12:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papa Louie (game series) has been accepted

[edit]
Papa Louie (game series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cambalachero (talk) 14:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:GirlsGoGames.com has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GirlsGoGames.com. Thanks! Mdann52 (talk) 10:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Pizza, Great Pizza (May 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
VRXCES (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Squiddyonwiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VRXCES (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Pizza, Great Pizza (May 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MKsLifeInANutshell was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 16:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:George Shea has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:George Shea. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I'm unsure how to differentiate this from other George Shea's. No middle name I can find. He's an event host, public relations professional, MLE co-founder … which makes the most sense to tack onto his name? Squiddyonwiki (talk) 01:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Pizza, Great Pizza has been accepted

[edit]
Good Pizza, Great Pizza, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiner Music (June 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon B. Simonis (July 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon B. Simonis (July 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 07:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Shea (Major League Eating) has been accepted

[edit]
George Shea (Major League Eating), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 00:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peglin has been accepted

[edit]
Peglin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 12:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rat czar has been accepted

[edit]
Rat czar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 17:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GirlsGoGames.com (September 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Conyo14 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Conyo14 (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon B. Simonis has been accepted

[edit]
Jon B. Simonis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 00:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Jon B. Simonis Leaving Court.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Horseshoe Island (New Jersey) has been accepted

[edit]
Horseshoe Island (New Jersey), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:45, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Squiddyonwiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Papa's Pizzeria (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Squiddyonwiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jinora (The Legend of Korra), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiner Music has been accepted

[edit]
Kiner Music, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 18:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hillside Park

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Squiddyonwiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hillside Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squiddyonwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Papa's Pizzeria".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squiddyonwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jinora".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peglin logo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peglin logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]