User talk:Steve Quinn/Archive 8

No Category:Bibliographic_databases for CAB_Direct_(database) ?

hi there, i was wondering why this article isn't in this category as well. i added it but then undid, i thought i'd better ask. thx. Bavb (talk) 17:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

It appears to be an oversight on my part. Thanks for your interest in this matter. Also, it appears that your edit would have been correct. It seems that you have good judgement and appropriate concern for other editor's work and that is much appreciated.

Also I see that you have a particular interest in bibliographic databases. So if you want to work on these articles, and add new articles pertaining to this topic, please feel free to do so. I can certainly use the help. Also, I will be glad to try to answer any questions you have.

One tip I can give you is to look at the articles in this section on my User page Scientific journals. Many of these articles list databases. There are a good number of these that I have created or have signifigantly edited. Also there may be some databases that don't have an article on Wikipedia yet, and perhaps an article is needed.

One trick I use is if there is not a lot of information for a particular database I place that information in a more general article, such as CSA (database company). I wrote most of the sections in that article. I am intending to do something similar with H. W. Wilson Company, when I get around to it. I started with the section entitled Database descriptions (in that article). There are other databases that are under the H.W. Wilson banner here (Electronic products). Summations of these databases could be added to the H.W. Wilson Company article. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 02:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

wonderful, thank you. i will review all of your suggested pages and articles. Bavb (talk) 17:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Volume !

Compare with Rolling Stone without the notability ???

There are SCHOLARS, among which Prof. David Looseley, pioneer of popular music studies, who wrote about Volume !, in a IASPM event! In the editorial board, which is online, there are scholars such as H. Becker, S. Frith, B. Lebrun, A. Hennion, S. Lacasse : these are MAJOR popular music studies scholars. Prof. Sheila Whiteley will be directing a coming issue on music and countercultures. These are serious academics, who support the journal, some have published articles in it. It is not known enough, yet, in the US and the UK, because we are based in France and publish mainly in French. But can't you just go beyond your certainties, and try and do some other type of research than just the good old googling? Did you know that there is some sort of an international segregation against anything not English in the databases you consult? Some kind of a bias? This is such an insult! You can find 18 scholarly articles in English, which were all peer-reviewed, online, here: http://www.seteun.net/spip.php?article5

Did you even just check out our website? How can you just write off things, with such contempt, in three lines and two minutes spent on Google? Is Google Scholar THE ultimate website to judge scholarly journals form all over the world? This is not a way to proceed. Best, Zamuse (talk) 19:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Richard Charles Burton "Burt" Hamilton III

Hello Steve Quinn. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Richard Charles Burton "Burt" Hamilton III, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: he exists; see http://www.gobignetwork.com/users/burton-hamilton. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 07:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

OK. I am amazed that someone was able to find this person. You must have special powers beyond the average Wikipedia editor :>) Steve Quinn (talk) 07:17, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

I googled "FF10 Partners", the name of his firm, and I was shocked to see his name come up. His WP biography has so much puffery in it (business magnate, world’s most creative people) that I also thought it was a hoax. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 07:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Circuit dreamer and his disruptive editing

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Circuit dreamer and his disruptive editing. Thank you. Glrx (talk) 02:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Don't bother

I read your email. Don't bother. I'm unelectable. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

OK. Thanks. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 18:12, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

PAM-CRASH article

Mr. Quinn,

I added a new article ("PAM-CRASH") about PAM-CRASH simulation software to the mainspace. I was wondering if you might be able to take a look at it and let me know what you think. Following your review, would I be able to remove the "unreviewed" tag from the top of the page? Or is that something that you as the reviewer would do? (I'm not aware of the protocol for this.) Thanks!Michael Leeman (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

I will be glad to look at it. Thanks for asking. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 22:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much for reviewing and revising my article. I greatly appreciate it!Michael Leeman (talk) 14:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Electronic Prescriptions for Controlled Substances

Mr. Quinn,

Hello again! Thank you very much for reviewing my article on PAM-CRASH simulation software last month (and for your kind words about the article). I wrote a new article, "Electronic Prescriptions for Controlled Substances," which I posted in the mainspace yesterday. If you could possibly review it when you have a chance, that would be great. Thank you!Michael Leeman (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Steve Quinn. You have new messages at Template talk:Advert.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

"Trusted Editor" status

Dear Steve,

I hope that all is well. I just have a quick question. A few user pages show the user as being a "Trusted Editor". Can you please tell me - how does one obtain that status? Do you have to write and/or edit a specific number of articles to become a Trusted Editor? Or is the title bestowed upon you for the quality of your editing work? Just curious. Thanks!

By the way, thank you once again for your help in reviewing some of articles I've written. I greatly appreciate your time and input in helping me to produce better articles! Michael Leeman (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Micheal - thanks for this information. I did not know that I am on other's pages as a "Trusted Editor". I am not sure how I achieved this status, but it certainly is a compliment. Most likely it comes from working with other editors on articles over time, while editing according to guidelines and policies. This means that facts, guidelines and policies outweigh my personal opinion. Chances are these are editors that I have worked with. Can you link me to one of these user's pages? Perhaps, if I can see one of these links I can give a definitive answer. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 19:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Dear Steve - Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Things have been quite hectic for me recently. With regard to the "Trusted Editor" status, I'm not sure if I've seen it applied specifically to you (although it may be. I'm not sure). I just meant that I'd seen a few times at Wikipedia and was curious as to what it signified. I think your answer is likely correct. If I come across it again, I'll let you know. Thank you as always for your response!Michael Leeman (talk) 18:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

External Links

Mr. Quinn,

Thank you for taking the time to keep the NDT page in Wikipedia up to date. However, please note that external links to the largest information sources for NDT information on the net are acceptable content as per Wikipedia:

"External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations which are the topic of the article"

For example, ndtWiki.com is a commercial entity that you did not remove from the list, yet you removed other more relevant sources of information.

Sincerely, David B 201.253.128.111 (talk) 12:26, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

First, I almost did remove ndtWiki.com but decided to think about it. That I did not remove it is not a rationale for restoring external links that might not belong in the article. Second, I doubt that links to recruiting sites, jobs, and classified adds are appropriate for an article on Wikipedia. Third, there were links claiming to link to U.S. government sites, but were linked to a commercial site instead. I don't know if these were restored, but hopefully not. It might be just as easy to link to the actual U.S. government sites. Thanks for your feedback. Hopefully we can reach an agreement as to what external links are relevant for this article. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 01:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

• I have copied this discussion to the talk page of Nondestructive testing. Please continue the discussion at this link. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 03:23, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Electoral Registration Officer

A tag has been placed on Electoral Registration Officer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thehistorian10 (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

I did not write this page. According to the edit history, I only created a redirect. Someone else changed this to an article. Also, it appears that the speedy delete has been declined. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 19:14, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

PixelMEDIA

Hi Steve - I just posted a new article ("PixelMEDIA") in the mainspace. If you have a chance and can look it over, that'd be great. I'd like to know if it looks okay to you. Thanks!Michael Leeman (talk) 19:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Steve - Thanks for getting back to me at my Talk page. If you can't review the article until Oct. 27 or shortly thereafter, that's fine. However, if you think it will be more than a few days until you can get to it, can you please let me know? I'll then try to find someone else who can review it. Thanks!Michael Leeman (talk) 14:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Steve--I am a little concerned about the articles that Leeman has been writing--I consider the final result in general as much too promotional, for reasons that I've explained on his talk page today. Since you are one of the people who have been giving him advice, perhaps you could take another look, in view of the problems that I have been finding. DGG ( talk ) 03:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

DGG --- Thanks for voicing your concern. I will certainly take another look at this person's work. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Steve Quinn! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Wolf moon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tribes and Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Plasmonic metamaterials, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lense (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Web of science and web of knowledge.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Web of science and web of knowledge.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I fixed the problem. It should be O.K. to remove the tag. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 09:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Platinum Metals Review

Hi Steve,

For your information: the journal Platinum Metals Review has a new logo.

Best wishes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcrpres (talk • contribs) 12:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Steve Quinn. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 12:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed undeletion of Transient (acoustics)

See Talk:Transient (acoustics)#Proposed undeletion. Andrewa (talk) 02:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Microelectronics International, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Electronic and John Atkinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

b2

I agree that page protection is probably necessary at this time. The anonymous IP is still endlessly repeating their self (same as mentioned in the previous edit hitories). The anonymous IP is also attempting to misuse policies and guidelines in order to serve a point of view. Instead, this person might wish to start a blog or visit an online forum in order to convince people of the merits of their important views. In addition, Wikipedia does not promote gossip in the main article or on the talk page. Rather, the goal of its editors is to build a high-quality encyclopedia within the context of a community. Finally, editors are not required to assume good faith in the presence of evidence to the contrary. In particular, all I've seen is multiple attempts to insert POV material that appears to denigrate this subject while being argumentative in contradiction to Wikipedia guidelines and policies. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 14:41, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Why not answer the questions about POV and grounds for censoring the article instead of using reductive approach that eludes (literally deletes) others opinions of the same. There are some very important points in the post that you just deleted. The policies exist to protect those who make nonstandard arguments. 194.78.195.29 (talk) 15:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

• So far the discussion has been counter-productive and does not serve to improve the article. Unilaterly removing an entire section on an article talk page while restoring or inserting other counter-productive content does not serve the interets of the article or Wikipedia. Also, section headings that are designed to denigrate Wiki editors are not helpful and are again counter-productive. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, as I said just now over on that talk page I didn't intend to remove anything there and I apologize. I was under the impression that new sections were to go first on the page. There is no visual mode here and it is a touch confusing.

I can and will disagree with comments, removal of text, and anything else on this WP and elsewhere, whenever and wherever I feel it is warranted. I think a discussion of that topic is warranted. It's an argument that has been made before in print, and from high places. It sure would be nice to have it developed in this environment. 194.78.195.29 (talk) 16:12, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

• That is fine, but you will find out that Wikipedia is not the place to take such a stance. Action that supports these views will probably result in being blocked for longer and longer periods of time. It's not just me, or the other two editors. This is general across Wikipedia. Other editors and administrators will do as we have done, I assure you. Hence, other venues are much more appropriate than Wikipedia - and we have pointed this out on the talk page of the article. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

*What you've just done reads like the editor himself propagandizing the publication via the wikipedia page. Are you sold out to this Bove guy or just out to get my edits at this point? Congratulations. All your great powers have managed to eliminate an idea you are against. The world is better because of your censorship.194.78.195.29 (talk) 07:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Quantum, Electronics

I think it would be better to create your new article as Quantum electronics (journal), and leave the existing redirect. This is the usual way we handle cases where a journal title is the same asa common word or phrase. After you have made the article, it will be necessary to make a disambiguation page, DGG ( talk ) 01:19, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• I agree. This actually occurred to me after I requested the speedy delete. Therefore I shall rescind my request for speedy delete. Thanks. Steve Quinn (talk) 01:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

You do excellent work

So you follow me over to Fine-structure constant and revert a deletion of my nonsense and pretty much save the day. I answer your questions at Talk:Time, each individually, and you "restore the format" so it can be easily read. Thanks for doing that, by the way. You have some prediliction for reliable sources and its obvious that time is a many spledid thing.

I think you know what you're doing. 71.169.187.182 (talk) 04:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the compliments. Best wishes - ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 18:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Insurance Medicine

@Steve Quinn:

Thanks a lot thay you have accepted the article insurance medicine. In my opinion we have also to wait, how it will go further. Now there is a possibility that the article can get better. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bergfex (talk • contribs) 06:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

ANI notification

Hi I was just reading through ANI and an anon you may be familiar with has made a report relating to the discussion at Talk:Time. Seeing as it was pretty obvious from the talk page history who they were referring to, I thought I'd drop you a line to the ANI here Blackmane (talk) 10:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

• OK thanks ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 14:09, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Good sportsmanship

Hi Steve. I just wanted to compliment you on your general good sportsmanship, for lack of a better term, over at Talk:Time. I appreciate the way you've come around to working on the compromise first sentence with the anon, me, Tigo, Rick, etc; but more than that I've noticed you redacting your own talk comments in the interest of not spurring further conflict, and now restoring the anon's comments which were allegedly personal attacks on you. That is, as the idiom goes, very big of you. Thanks. --Pfhorrest (talk) 03:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Pfhorrest, you are very welcome. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 04:00, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. When you recently edited Homogeneity (physics), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Invariance, Electromagnetic and Constituents (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Volume

Hi Steve, could you help me out here? Why is there a second round of questioning, here, and why are they not convinced by arguments that seemed relevant to you? Is this process normal? Thanks, Zamuse (talk) 10:49, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

No qualms

I have no problem with your deletion of that section. I did not mean it as sarcastic though. I meant it as an example of the research specimen notabilty having nothing to do with the notability of the research itself.--Canoe1967 (talk) 04:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

I apologize for mischaracterizing your edit. However, if you look where your comment was placed it was easy to see it in this way. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 01:56, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

I understand completely. Many of my 'helpful' comments have an element of humour in them. It is just my nature. It wasn't rev-deleted so they may actually read his article about peas becoming a foundation for a very large field of science. When I saw the mice comment I thought of Mendel because of that fact.--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:16, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Wim Crusio

Oh, you'll delete the comments because you don't like the content, but you won't do anything about the content because the subject, a friend of Wikipedia, is managing his own page. This place is full of bullies and hypocrites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.174.69.4 (talk) 02:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

It has nothing to do with liking the comments. It has to do with guidelines and policies such as WP:NPA, WP:TALK, and WP:SOAP. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 02:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Actually, I see he's a trusted associate of yours, too. COI. Oh, and it's not scarcasm, it's an assessment of the situation. The fact that you see it as sarcasm shows you're part of the problem, not the solution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.174.69.4 (talk) 03:27, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Well, most people aren't aware of the WP:CABAL that exists on Wikipedia. Relatively speaking, it is a small group. But it seems you have discovered the conspiracy. Sh-h-h-h! Please keep it to yourself. --- Steve Quinn (talk) 03:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Purge function

Regarding comments at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volume! AfD discussion, the red link appearing in the AfD template is almost always corrected (from my experience) by simply purging the page. This clears the page's server cache and updates the link as a functional blue-link. For more information, see Wikipedia:Purge. Happy editing! Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:56, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

SciVerse

Hi Steve, I don't think this could be called a "database". SciVerse is the Elsevier online platform for all of their products (journals, databases, etc). Note that they themselves don't call it a database but a "platform". For other publishers, we just make a redirect for their online platforms. Cheers, --Guillaume2303 (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Surface Science Reports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Kalinski

Dear Steve, Hi. I have looked to find out any biographical details about Matt Kalinski but can't find much that is useful and citable but I think a big claim to notability relates to Trojan Wave Packets. I hope is ok to ask this but would you know anything about Matt Kalinski and whether you think he is WP:Notable? Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 10:16, 23 August 2012 (UTC))

I am not familiar with his work other than the article you just mentioned. It looks like the article has the wrong first name. I have commented over at the AfD and I will comment more later. However, at this moment I don't think this person has satisfied the notability criteria. I will look into this some more. Yet, perhaps, sometime later (5 years, or 10 years) he will have accomplished enough satisfy the criteria. (That probably doesn't sound magnanamous). ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 17:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for having a look at this. I am unsure but a bit dubious. The papers listed in GS seem interesting and take him to a H index of around 11 or so but I have not been able find out where he is. Maciej did his PhD at Rochester and has a funny page there (where he is Matt)[1] and is listed on a recent paper as in Chemistry and Biochemistry at Utah [2] but there is also some stuff about a visa issue.[3]. At neither place can I find a proper page/entry on him. I think my hope had been you might know him via the Trojan wave packet work and might know that his contribution there was notable. Anyway best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2012 (UTC))

The link you provided to his web page [4] is certainly interesting :>} ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 02:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

I can't read the Swedish but it seems to be he is Matt on a kind of Nobel Prize certificate! :) (Msrasnw (talk) 09:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC))

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Blinking colloidal nanocrystals at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:16, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Science Signaling, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AAAS and BIOBASE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)