User talk:Tcnuk

Welcome!

Hello, Tcnuk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Pride and Prejudice

Hey, thanks for those edits on Pride and Prejudice, pages often need those type of consistency edits. It is great to see new editors take the initiative to clean up articles, even if they are unfamiliar with the topic, because that is a great way to become familiar with the interface of Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing, and you continue to do so in the future. If you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page and if you are interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels, that would be awesome to. SADADS (talk) 19:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know how many policies there are out there (I don't know the half of them and I have nearly 2000 edits and read alot of community discussion and news stuff), and many of them are only suggestions that guide arguments and aren't meant as catchall rules. The best solution for conflicts is simply to talk about it on discussion pages. Remember don't be a afraid to WP:Be Bold!.SADADS (talk) 21:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finding help for a Math article

I would try to contact some of the active members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Participants that express relevant interests. The best way to check activity is to look for recent contributions at the user contributions page. Also, ask for help at the mathematics discussion on the community portal found on the side bar. Or you could explore the Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics page for other routes of contact. Also consider, if you have access, going to JSTOR or Google Scholar and looking at articles on the topic, that might help... Hope this gets you pointed in the right direction.

I took a glance at the page and the article could definitely use some sourcing for statements about terminology etc. SADADS (talk) 15:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If someone put there name down on a Wikipedia with interest in a certain area, it means that they are willing to help people manage, improve or support pages in that subject area (usually). I find active users like to be contacted and they may know of someone else to point to. If someone doesn't respond well... it is a bunch of people spending there spare time to edit the compendium of knowledge in the English speaking world, you can only hold them responsible for so much. The discussion at the community portal would also be useful, because it would bring in people that are looking for something to do.

I took a glance through the history of the page and User:Charles Matthews made some contributions early on and he might know something about that subject area, he looks to be really active with the mathematics stuff.SADADS (talk) 17:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Pride and Prejudice

To me it looks like it workt. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 10:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry but i have no idea of why you only see the edit before my rollback. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 10:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

No problem, hope you get it fixt. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 11:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

R-F theorem

I did need to go a little more slowly on that rating. The article was already rated as a stub on the talk page, so I really only added the priority and field parameters. But you're right that the stub rating wasn't correct. I have changed it to a B rating. My main suggestion for future improvement would be to expand the example some; it's a little too terse for my taste, since the people who read examples are people who don't already know what's going on.

In general, you should feel free to update the rating values, even if you have contributed to the article, up to B+ class. Only the GA, A, and FA values require any outside opinion. The lower ones can be thought of as progress tracking, and editors who work on a particular article are usually in the best position to gauge its progress. — Carl (CBM · talk) 16:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it...!

I'd deleted that article by mistake because I thought a blocked user had created it. That user did, however, create the graphic. I've gone ahead and restored it for you. Thanks for asking and sorry about the inconvenience. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:33, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mihlin or Mikhlin multiplier theorem

Hello, I have changed the heading of the section of the Multiplier (Fourier analysis) from Mihlin multiplier theorem to Mikhlin multiplier theorem, since it is the most common transliteration for the name of the author (see also the references i added): as a matter of fact, only Elias Stein still uses this transliteration in his books. I hope you'll agree. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 14:08, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have left an answer to your post at my talk page: User talk:Daniele.tampieri#Mihlin.2FMikhlin. Thank you for your attention. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 14:52, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio link on Tales

I double checked on WP:AN and it was confirmed that such links should be removed from edit history too, which I've done. Thanks for the concern. --MASEM (t) 15:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Verification for paper needed

Please see Talk:Bochner–Riesz mean#Fefferman paper. Thanks. —bender235 (talk) 01:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You strike me as the kind of editor that'll notice via the watchlist (probably unlike me, so if you need to contact me further, best to do so here), but just letting you know that I've fixed the reference and commented back on the article talk page. Thanks. Tcnuk (talk) 09:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tcnuk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tcnuk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tcnuk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]