User talk:Tesko111111

You behave exactly like banned editor Comanche cph aka Arigato1. I have enforced a community ban which means that you will remain blocked until another administrator unblocks you.--Berig (talk) 13:31, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ehh what? How is i not allowed to edit. Who are you to decide. I have no idea in what you talking about. But i might create a new account if this account is blocked for no reason. --Tesko111111 (talk) 14:09, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I add the version of this talkpage that you blanked here. I know that you have a long history of creating new accounts, and I believe you when you say you will. Note, however, that by evading blocks you risk getting blocked immediately again.--Berig (talk) 14:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ive blanked my own talk page because. nothing is wrong with that. this account is my first account on en.wikipedia. But yes i will create a new account if this is blocked for no reason. Or your reason? I think you have problems with my edits of your own POV issues. So you try to cut me of in accusing me of being some other account. --Tesko111111 (talk) 14:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to raise your complaints on this talkpage, and if another administrator believes you, s/he can unblock you.--Berig (talk) 14:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You as a ADMIN of some sort. Have reverted a POV and UNSOURCED edit on on Dano-Norwegian Navy. So because you have dedicated your life to wikipedia, you can decide what to be in them and what not to. No matter if there is sources or not. I will create a new account with same name and revert your POV edits. --Tesko111111 (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tesko111111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The administrator user:Berig seems to have a problem with me. He is accusing me for being someone else, which is not true. But i think his real problem is my removal of some highly seemed POV edits, with no sources provided (i have linked). The problem seems that this user:Beric, is that he has used so much time on wikipedia, for now finally to be an administrator. And now he uses this title to go around and edit pages to his own POV.

Here is one example of it http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Varangians&diff=252155890&oldid=252143400, were the source in Swedish text, does not state any of the edit.

Here is another example, were there is NO sources provided and seems largely like his POV http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Royal_Dano-Norwegian_Navy&diff=252156087&oldid=252011748

I will also request the administrator board to take a closer look at user:Beric and his capability as administrator. thanks. --Tesko111111 (talk) 16:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Let's see. Accused of being a sockpuppet because your edits match those of a known sockpuppeteer, you (a) claim innocence, and (b) promise to create more accounts. That's not going to get you unblocked, but it will call our attention to your new accounts, when (not if) they are discovered doing the same thing. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 17:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tesko111111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have this account only. There is a fault. Maybe some old IP address still listed at wikipedia. I don't know. If that so, then erase the other accounts i'm (wrongly) accused to be. They are inactive as they probably are if they are listed on this IP.--Tesko111111 (talk) 17:54, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So let's see if I understand this correctly. Your edits not only match those of a confirmed sockmaster, but you clearly state your intention to evade your block. Sorry, I'm not comfortable unblocking. And since you've repeatedly removed the original decline, your talk page is now protected.— Blueboy 96 19:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Evidence of where user has removed previous reviews: [1], [2], [3]. Blueboy 96 19:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]