User talk:TheDoctorX

Greetings My Children

Imagine that there exists a vast expanse of inspiring words in this space that will make you whole, content, and refuse to listen to country-western music.TheDoctorX (talk) 05:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

I apologise for any slight you have taken in my recent exchanges on the article Sanchin, it was not intended and my ire came from a place of trying to a good job on the article. Let's bury the hatchet? Mountain^cirque 14:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC) has extended an olive branch of peace.[reply]

Thank you, accepted, and I will redact my "trifle on the harsh side of strict" rhetoric if you wish. TheDoctorX (talk) 03:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is Why I Do Not Bother with Wiki Much

Decision of the Mediation Committee

Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #4, "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute at the article talk page and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice". See DISCFAIL. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 17:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC) (Chairperson)[reply]

______

Party refused any engagement.

I will recognize this decision represents acceptance of the article AS IT IS. TheDoctorX (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of any desire to fulfill responsibilities. TheDoctorX (talk) 18:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that no "decision" was made by the Mediation Committee except the decision to reject your application for mediation. That rejection contains no comment nor judgment on the merits, or lack thereof, of any position taken by any party or prospective party to the mediation, but merely reflects the fact that the Committee will not accept the case due to its failure to meet the prerequisites for mediation. Neither does it "represent acceptance of the article as it is" or imply anything at all about the content matter or matters, or article text, in dispute. (Indeed, mediation through the Mediation Committee does not make "decisions" of any kind about the content of articles since mediation is not arbitration. Mediation is guided discussion with a view towards bringing the parties to consensus, not a tribunal which makes judgments about content. No such tribunal exists at Wikipedia.) If a party will not engage in discussion, consider the recommendations made in DISCFAIL. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC) (Chairperson)[reply]

_____

Inaction, as well as action, results in obvious consequences. It is a decision. You, or anyone else in your curiously titled "Mediation Committee," could have taken helpful and constructive action, action, if I prov'd an unkind man, I would have noted would have taken far less time than it took to compose the above excuses to avoid rendering assistance kindly requested.

Instead, I merely observe that you refused.

"That is that."

"It is what it is."

Absent actual constructive and helpful action, I consider this matter closed. TheDoctorX (talk) 21:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

___________

I will note, en passant, in response to my correction of his misrepresentation of the situation, the individual offered more weak and factually incorrect excuses on his own Talk, the congealing of which certainly exceeded the time and effort that he, or anyone else in the inestimable "Mediation Committee" that does not, actually, mediate anything, would have expended checking the article.

Quod erat demonstrandum.

TheDoctorX (talk) 21:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No Longer Contributing to ja.wikipedia.org

Failure of editors to adhere to the rules. They apply to everyone, 馬鹿! TheDoctorX (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]