User talk:TheJoebro64/Archive 11

Sir Donkles

Hey, JoeBro! Would you be able to let me know how you learned videogamedunkey's middle name is 'Yevgeniy'? Thanks for creating the Dunk wiki - Chronicler — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChroniclerSprite (talk • contribs) 21:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ChroniclerSprite, hey! Sorry for the late reply. His middle name's provided in this source, which is cited at the beginning of the article. JOE BRO 64 11:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! I was thinking whether not to add in a video I was working on but it's probably too much info. You can check out the video here if you'd like! =) ChroniclerSprite (talk) 16:28, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thank you for helping Total Recall become a Featured Article. You helped get it over the finish line and I really appreciate that as I thought I was going to have to wait two weeks and try again. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 13:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Darkwarriorblake, happy to help! Very much looking forward to seeing your next projects JOE BRO 64 01:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

Hello TheJoebro64,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 813 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 845 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Katana Zero

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Katana Zero you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 10:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Pinball Land

I’ve started a vote thingy upon your suggestion on the page. To note, the game's page has been “Super Mario Ball” since October 2018. It was changed back to the US title in May by a user who was later blocked, and then I changed it back in December. it remained that way for two years without any problems, and then another user changes it back in May, and now I’m the one who should be wrong about this. Luigitehplumber (talk) 18:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Katana Zero

The article Katana Zero you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Katana Zero for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morbius

See talk page before reverting again, thanks. The editor has been reverting multiple users who object to his edits and in spite of what sources say. The discussion ended with no consensus for the removal of that content, given the multiple sources provided.--Earthh (talk) 13:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic Frontiers gameplay screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sonic Frontiers gameplay screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 16:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

Hello TheJoebro64,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000^[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.^[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 14760 articles, as of 02:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gungeon

Saw in your neat list that you were looking at bringing Enter the Gungeon to FA status. Coincidentally, I was hoping to bring it to GA after I finished my current nom Dead Cells. Do you mind if I help out a little bit? CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 06:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CollectiveSolidarity: I'd absolutely love to collaborate! Let me know when you'd like to start. I'm pretty busy in real life at the moment but I'll let you know as soon as my schedule's cleared up JOE BRO 64 08:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me when you're available! I've finished my other projects. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 18:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CollectiveSolidarity, I can get started on the reception section later this week. Probably around Friday or Saturday JOE BRO 64 23:29, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is an "Easter egg link"?

Your edit created a dead link. Could you please explain what is an "Easter egg link"? Please link to the relevant Wikipedia policy pages in your answer. Either remove the link entirely or link it to the correct page. - wneo (talk) 06:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wesleyneo: WP:EASTEREGG JOE BRO 64 09:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheJoebro64: Since the article already mentions that Rogue One is an "immediate prequel" of Star Wars in the introduction of the article, the reader doesn't need to open the link to understand what the reference is. Besides, my main issue is with the dead link. If it indeed an easter egg link (which it is not, in my humble opinion), then the entire link should be removed and just the text left there. I see no reason for a dead link there. - wneo (talk) 13:17, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. The dead link has been removed in a recent edit. I still contest the fact that it is an easter egg link but I have decided not to pursue it. Thank you for your time. Have a nice day. wneo (talk) 13:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is objectively an easter egg link. "Hope" would reasonably link to hope, not to Star Wars (film). —El Millo (talk) 17:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully disagree. To quote the help page: "Keep piped links as transparent as possible. Do not use piped links to create 'Easter egg' links that require the reader to open them (or, at least, to move their mouse pointer into this link) before understanding where they lead." As I mentioned in my previous comment, the reference to the other Star Wars film is already mentioned in the introduction. So this link would simply be helpful in navigation. The reference itself is not lost. If I am reading the policy correctly, this is the intention of discouraging easter egg links. If the primary explanation of the policy is that there will no link in the printed version and the reference is lost, then this is not an easter egg link. The connection between the two films is not established through this link. It is mentioned explicitly in the text, much before this link. All the link does is allow the reader to click through to the other film at this point in the web version of the article. It does not create new knowledge. Removing the link does not subtract from the knowledge gained in reading the article, on the web or otherwise.

Of course, the question of whether the link itself is helpful or necessary is an entirely different one. There can be too many links, etc., wneo (talk) 03:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's definitely an easter egg link, because it requires the reader to open the link to see where it goes. There's no way to be confident about it beforehand. Popcornfud (talk) 10:46, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the help page has a valid example (not present in the current version of the page from where it is taken though) where one must click on the link to see where it goes. What do you make of that?

a war launched in 1763 by a loose confederation of elements of Native American tribes.

The phrase "loose confederation of elements" in this example is linked to Pontiac's Rebellion#Origins.

If my reading is correct, the intent of the policy is to prevent the loss of knowledge resulting from the loss of the link. It is not a blanket ban on all links whose piped text don't match the title of the target.

Anyway, the original issue is resolved. The dead link has been removed. So the matter is closed. wneo (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am just going to leave an example here.

In the 'Plot' section of Terminator 2: Judgment Day, the phrase "Judgement Day" links to Terminator (franchise)#Judgment Day and not Judgement Day. Can one now claim that it is an easter egg link because "it requires the reader to open the link to see where it goes"? No. The sentence immediately elaborates the concept in the context of the film after an em dash. Similarly the reference between Rogue One and Star Wars (film) is already established in the introduction. In fact, the piped text for that reference is "Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope". So, the reader is not entirely ignorant about where the link with the text "hope" may lead.

One could argue that the the "Judgment Day" is actually an easter egg link. Since the explanation for "Judgement Day" comes after the link, it is strictly an easter egg link. At the point of encountering the link, the reader is still in the dark about the term. It should therefore be removed. In that case, "hope" in Rogue One does not qualify as the reference precedes it! A counter-argument could be the distance between the link and its explanation but that's just nitpicking. wneo (talk) 16:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're hiding a link to Star Wars (film) behind a normal, everyday word people use (hope). That's the epitome of an Easter egg link. That Judgement Day example you provide is a false equivalency, and doesn't even work because it's not an Easter egg link (it literally goes to something called "Judgement Day". Stop clogging up my talk page with this nonsense. You're wasting my time, and you've wasted Facu-el Millo and Popcornfud's too. JOE BRO 64 16:54, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for clogging up your talk page but "Judgement Day" is also "a normal, everyday word people use" (at least in Judeo-Christian and Islamic cultures) and the normal sense of the word is not what it means in the context of the universe of the Terminator franchise. But I repeat myself.

That's it. I am done. Thank you for all your time. Have a splendid Sunday. wneo (talk) 03:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol \| July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wizards of Waverly Place FAC

Hi, I appreciated your review on the Hannah Montana FAC back in January. If possible, I would greatly appreciate a comment on my Wizards of Waverly Place FAC if you have the time. I understand if you are unable to. Thanks in advance. SatDis (talk) 02:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SatDis, I'd be willing to review in exchange for a review of Donkey Kong Country, which I just nominated JOE BRO 64 06:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. I will get to it over the next week. Thanks in advance! SatDis (talk) 06:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on Template:Donkey Kong

Hi! Totally get the potential for disagreement on the edit I made, was hoping you'd be open to talking about a different way of organizing it since it's not the first time it's been proposed this way on this template. I started a discussion on the talk page. ArmosNights (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon Luna games

Hi, I recently made edits to articles adding in Luna games similar to the way I did with Katana Zero, and you recently undid this revision. What stops Luna from being a platform? Aren't the architectures to bring the game to Luna vastly different from the likes of Windows? What makes Stadia a platform, but not Luna? Venky64 (talk) 10:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If Luna isn't allowed in the infoboxes I will subsequently undo the rest of the revisions of the pages I edited. Venky64 (talk) 10:42, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Venky64, if my understanding is correct, we're only supposed to be listing streaming services as a platform if a PC game is exclusive to said platform. This applies to Stadia as well. Katana Zero is already on PC, so I don't think it'd qualify to list Luna as a platform. Of course, this is a question that's more oriented towards WT:VG, as this is just based on my memory of previous consensus. JOE BRO 64 11:05, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 152#Amazon Luna - also a platform like Stadia?

As far as I can tell here, there are several comments in favor of adding Luna to the infobox; however, I'm still unclear on what the consensus is. They say Stadia isn't a streaming service because of the consumer's ability to purchase individual games. Stadia, as far as I can tell, has been added under the infobox for almost every game it supports. I posted on WT:VG yesterday and didn't receive a response because I assume they don't like to revolve around already-resolved talking points. Venky64 (talk) 11:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Venky64: just wanted to let you know I've restored Luna in Katana Zero, I realized I was wrong. Sorry for the misunderstanding! JOE BRO 64 20:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheJoebro64 Thank you so much for letting me know! The reverts you made to my edit cast a lot of doubt onto whether I should make similar edits to other pages, but this clears a lot of that up! Luna access is apparently only exclusive to mainland US users, so I think it would be appropriate to give it a US tag in the infobox. Would this be the right move? Venky64 (talk) 13:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Venky64: sounds about right. JOE BRO 64 14:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About Template:Donkey Kong and Yooka-Laylee

I was wondering on your rationale on putting Yooka-Laylee on Template:Donkey Kong. It does not seem to fit in as well as the others in that area. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:49, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Oinkers42), it was developed by the same staff, shares many gameplay similarities (including minecart levels), Impossible Lair is widely described as a spiritual successor in reliable sources, and Donkey Kong is repeatedly mentioned in both Yooka-Laylee articles. You could've found this out by just reading the articles or doing a simple Google search. JOE BRO 64 16:23, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It just does not feel connected enough compared to the others listed. For instance, Conker (series) had Conker the Squirrel appear in Diddy Kong Racing, as did Banjo from Banjo-Kazooie. That is the kind of direct connections we are looking for. I will say Impossible Lair makes sense for the template, but the original game does not have as strong a connection. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:07, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic the Hedgehog 2 Sweet Sweet Sweet.mp3

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sonic the Hedgehog 2 Sweet Sweet Sweet.mp3. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MajorSonicCharacters.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MajorSonicCharacters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

Hello TheJoebro64,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination: MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF: The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers: The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of Donkey Kong Country

Congratulations, TheJoebro64! The article you nominated, Donkey Kong Country, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to post here when an edit conflict got in the way, but a job well done! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:09, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I couldn't have done without Jaguar, it was a fantastic collaboration and it's immensely satisfying to see it finished. JOE BRO 64 12:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem :) SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Half Barnstar Get!

		The Half Barnstar
		I must congratulate you and Jaguar for your extraordinary efforts getting Donkey Kong Country to Featured status. To see a title that carried such significant influence (including on one particular series I hold near and dear) join those ranks is a great personal joy and absolutely requires my thanks. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cat's Tuxedo: thank you! Means a lot to hear this! JOE BRO 64 11:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP message

Hi TheJoebro64,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DKC

Joe, thank you for your unflagging and tireless work with Donkey Kong Country. Honestly I feel that it was 90% you, and to a certain extent I piggybacked off the glory! I hoped that I offered enough help, despite my long absences. The article is unrecognisable from its GA state, and is among WPVG's finest work IMO. If you ever wanted to work on DKC2 let me know - I don't know how much coverage there is on development but it's an interesting prospect, and it's my favourite in the series. ♦ jaguar 21:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguar, thank you for the kind words! It was a collaborative effort in my eyes - your GA work on the article still largely formed the basis of our work in my opinion, and I immensely enjoyed the project. I'd be down to work on DKC2 in the future; I'm working on the first Retro Studios DKC at the moment. I know Retro Gamer did a Making Of feature and there might be a Pix'n Love book with development details for DKC2 so it won't be too tough a project. (Also, Nick Thorpe has informed me that the next issue or Retro Gamer will have a massive DKC feature) JOE BRO 64 12:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FAC request

Hi Joe, if you have any time would you be able to take a look at the FAC for Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine? It's struggling to attract attention and I'd appreciate any comments you could provide. Anarchyte (talk) 12:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchyte, I'd be glad to help out. Sorry for the late reply - I got COVID and have been wiped out these past few days - but I've marked my spot and should have a review up within a few days. JOE BRO 64 00:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. No worries about any delays. I'll be happy to review your comments whenever you're ready. Anarchyte (talk) 04:54, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Sonic the Hedgehog characters

Template:Sonic the Hedgehog characters has been nominated for merging with Template:Sonic the Hedgehog. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 04:11, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello TheJoebro64,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Promotion of Katana Zero

Congratulations, TheJoebro64! The article you nominated, Katana Zero, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DC Universe by Gary Frank.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DC Universe by Gary Frank.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"PlayStation Gear" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect PlayStation Gear and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 1#PlayStation Gear until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Celeste

Hiya! I noticed that over at your video game project, you have 2018's game listed as Celeste. I just started a draft for the game, and just wanted to alert you, so we don't end up making "competing" articles, so feel free to help of there if you want. I've been looking a lot at your project (and used things like Katana Zero as a recent video game FA to base things off of), and it's excellent work, so the last thing I'd want to do is 'step on your toes'. Cheers! DecafPotato (talk) 02:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DecafPotato, no problem! I honestly don't care if you want to go ahead with Celeste—I wasn't going to get around to it in a while, and there were so many games released in 2018 that I enjoyed that I can easily just choose another article. Good luck! JOE BRO ⁶⁴ 13:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic Frontiers

I see what you're referring to now. I looked at the one relating to Washington Post and kept misreading it not seeing how it was talking about the player reviews. Maybe it could be moved? Regardless how it's put in the lead is a little awkward. Maybe it could be reworded to say that many publications (or maybe news outlets?) commented on the positive reception from players. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:56, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

FYI, looks like someone nominated one of your articles for deletion but failed to follow protocol and notify you. It's Sonic P-06. Sergecross73 msg me 15:28, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sergecross73, sorry for the late reply haha, but thanks for the heads up. I've been extraordinarily busy lately with finals and such so I haven't had too much Wiki time, but I saw that the P-06 article wasn't going anywhere because cooler heads prevailed, so I didn't chime in. Thanks for the notification though! Should get back to normal within the next week. JOE BRO ⁶⁴ 16:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. At first I was going to try to bother you more to make sure you saw it, but as you say, it was never really in danger of being deleted, so I didn't bother. Hope finals went well. See you around when you're back around more. Sergecross73 msg me 16:22, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

InfiniteNexus (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas, TheJoebro64! Have a quantumanic new year! InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:53, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you InfiniteNexus! To you as well! JOE BRO ⁶⁴ 16:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Trailblazer101 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:49, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trailblazer101, thank you! You as well! JOE BRO ⁶⁴ 14:10, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

—El Millo (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

—El Millo (talk) 17:08, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Donkey Kong Land

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Donkey Kong Land you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shooterwalker -- Shooterwalker (talk) 19:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

TheJoebro64,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello TheJoebro64,

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Your GA nomination of Donkey Kong Land

The article Donkey Kong Land you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Donkey Kong Land for comments about the article, and Talk:Donkey Kong Land/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shooterwalker -- Shooterwalker (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

B-a-r-n-s-t-a-r

		The Good Article Barnstar
		A good article from start to finish in just about one week is seriously impressive. Congratulations and thank you for yet another GA! DecafPotato (talk) 00:18, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DecafPotato, thank you! Nice to see my work hasn't gone unnoticed. It's been a while since I did a smaller article like Donkey Kong Land and it was nice to have it go so breezy—maybe I'll do some more smaller ones over the next few weeks/months... JOE BRO ⁶⁴ 00:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] t including another ~6,000 redirects

[2] The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

[a]

[b]