User talk:The Most Comfortable Chair/Archive 2023
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:The Most Comfortable Chair. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 2020 | Archive 2021 | Archive 2022 | Archive 2023 | Archive 2024 |
Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Contributor copyright investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer, nominator, or participant on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 for User:Doug Coldwell. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. See Wikipedia talk:Good article reassessment/February 2023#DC GAs not on original 223 list. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Philip Slier
Philip Slier has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Re. AfC of Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism
Hi! I see that you reviewed an AfC submission for Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism. The article contains extensive promotional language, suffers from NPOV issues, is sourced inappropriately in almost all sections, and includes numerous external links formatted as citations, so I'm surprised it passed through the AfC process.
More importantly, the editor who submitted that draft, User:Lenappasamy, is a paid editor. I don't know if they disclosed this to you, or if you were aware of it at the time, but it would have been a relevant factor to consider. As I'm reworking the article, do you have any other feedback, any pointers or considerations I should be aware of? Thanks, and happy editing! Actualcpscm (talk) 16:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Bugchasing
Bugchasing has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Isthistwisted (talk) 02:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |