User talk:Thegraham

Thanks

Thanks for the quick revert on my userpage. It looks like a vandal just back from a previous block.... And the fight goes on. Thanks again, --TeaDrinker 21:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks again! --TeaDrinker 17:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ceiling cat 00.jpg

You gave no reason why the image should be deleted. -Nv8200p talk 22:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I love wikipedia and like editing but I'm still quite teh n00b so haven't got round to creating a user page, sorry about that.

Yeah, I'm from Didsbury but I'm afraid I don't know enough about the City Council to be able to provide that much assistance.

82.35.18.132

This user has been blocked for one week for vandalism, as per your request on WP:AIV. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalising

Could you not sen me crap about me vandalising the Ku Klux KLan page when ive never edited a single page.

List

Could you E-mail me a list on what is considered vandalizing? Thanks Naturemisstress

203.206.171.134

I saw your posted warning on this user's talk page, and thought I'd let you know he/she is at it again. —Skope (talk) 01:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

The funny thing is, I've added that userbox to the work wiki as well. Muhahahahaha. Da-rb 17:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Tags on non-notable councillors

... and I've reinserted them. I'm not keen to move them to AfDs as if theres more information to add to them then it could become contentious ("They've already been deleted"). I've explained why I think that your reading of the Manchester Councillors decision was wrong on their talk page. JASpencer 09:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Councillors

Please stop making silly accusations on my talk page. Firstly I have been merging plenty of Liberal Democrat nonentities as well as Labour nobodies. Secondly I can't recall a single incident where I've put a redirect for one of these articles. An apology will be gratefully received, although hardly expected on your past form. JASpencer 21:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Private Schools

The issue of Mr Bradley's choice for his son's education was an important factor for electors, which is why I have reverted it. It is NOT vandalism

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elaine Boyes

The article Elaine Boyes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local Councillor. No references, no news articles of significance, nothing that passes WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peripitus (Talk) 06:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Thegraham! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Sue Murphy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
M. Afzal Khan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Elaine Boyes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sue Murphy (politician)

The article Sue Murphy (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN.

After 7 years, still no secondary refs or proof of notability. Couldn't find significant media coverage through Google, and not a member of a national legislature.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Dobson listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ken Dobson. Since you had some involvement with the Ken Dobson redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Battle (politician) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jim Battle (politician). Since you had some involvement with the Jim Battle (politician) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mick Loughman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mick Loughman. Since you had some involvement with the Mick Loughman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Con Keegan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Con Keegan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Con Keegan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Traditionalist (talk) 11:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Con Keegan

A tag has been placed on Con Keegan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This was voted to be deleted but the closing admin seemingly forgot to delete it.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Traditionalist (talk) 11:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Pagel listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Martin Pagel. Since you had some involvement with the Martin Pagel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thegraham. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:JohnLeechChristiePostcard.png

The file File:JohnLeechChristiePostcard.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Naeem Ul Hassan" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Naeem Ul Hassan. Since you had some involvement with the Naeem Ul Hassan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Senator2029 “Talk” 09:15, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]